It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why would anyone want to see the rest of the photos? The figure appeared only in this picture so there would be no need to see the rest of his days pictures.
I understand what you are saying but the point I am making is if you don't accept what Jim tempelton said then its pointless analysing the photo.
If you don't believe he wouldn't see his wife standing in front of him then the discussion is futile because why would you listen to me if you dnt listen to the source.
originally posted by: liteonit6969
Hello
After my disastrous first attempt at creating a new topic I thought id take another go, and no better way than to revisit one of my favourite images regarding alien/space. I don't feel there is any need to go over the back story of the Solwayfirth spaceman as I assume if you are on here you will know the rough story. I had left this topic behind a while back but it was a recent post suggesting half a face was visible looking forward. This idea that the spaceman was facing forward bemused me as it didn't fit the posture of the figure, but it suited the dea of it being a spaceman with the dark helmet.
This is the file I decided to have a closer look at to see if I could debunk or add to this idea of a face being there.
snip
So I welcome any views or opinions on the image and maybe someone can tell me if im looking for something that is not there.
originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: Char-Lee
I understand what you are saying but the point I am making is if you don't accept what Jim tempelton said then its pointless analysing the photo. If he said it wasn't his wife then why try to find something that isn't there like it being a dress etc. The reason for analysing and taking time on the image is to see if there is any truth, not TRY to debunk him. If you don't believe he wouldn't see his wife standing in front of him then the discussion is futile because why would you listen to me if you dnt listen to the source.
The reason this topic has been brought up again and again is because it isn't straight forward as some have pointed out. If it was as clear as a lady wearing a dress with her back to us then why has it been discussed so much? But maybe it is a balding man in a sleeveless dress if that fits what you want better?
originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: Imagewerx
I have looked over your thread twice and appreciate the work you have put into it, but all I see is a lot of assumptions being made that relies fully on a person completely missing his wife standing in full view behind his daughter.
originally posted by: liteonit6969
a reply to: ZetaRediculian
Thankyou for taking the time out of your day to make your comment. For such a ridiculous and silly conversation I don't understand why you would go out of your way to get the picture you have inserted and comment. If it was so silly would you not just ignore and move on. Either you have too much time on your hands or you are fulfilling your contract of creating widespread ridicule of any thread. Thanks for a look into your life and your possible objectives