It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Scientists at the Penn Museum (the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology) announced Tuesday they had found a 6,500-year-old skeleton in the museum basement.
The bones belonged to a once well-muscled, 5'9" man estimated to be at least 50 years old. His remains had been lying in a coffin-like box for 85 years with no identifying documents. Since he likely outlived a great flood that, millennia later would be a precursor to the Biblical story, some are referring to the skeleton as "Noah."
I like to try and imagine the life of the individual or individuals found. It's a form of time travel, I suppose you could say.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
Goodness!
Does anyone else find it disturbing that they had him in a closet for 85 years, and just "found" him? Seriously, what is going on at our museums?
Otherwise very interesting story OP.
As such, Penn researchers named the rediscovered skeleton "Noah." Though, since the skeleton is much older than the Bible, "Utnapishtim" would have been more appropriate. "He was named in the Gilgamesh epic as the man who survived the great flood," William Hafford, Ur Digitization Project Manager at Penn.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
Goodness!
Does anyone else find it disturbing that they had him in a closet for 85 years, and just "found" him? Seriously, what is going on at our museums?
originally posted by: smyleegrl
a reply to: LightningStrikesHere
No, I don't think the researchers named him "Noah" because they thought he was the exact person referred to in the Bible, but because the area of silt they found him in was the remnants of a major flood.
Still, clarification is always a welcome thing.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: chiefsmom
Goodness!
Does anyone else find it disturbing that they had him in a closet for 85 years, and just "found" him? Seriously, what is going on at our museums?
LOL
You dig when you can, as much as you can. You research later, when you can't dig.
Maybe the original finder died before he could finish or something.
Harte
originally posted by: LightningStrikesHere
a reply to: smyleegrl
just to be clear its not the skeleton of the biblical 'Noah"
originally posted by: djz3ro
originally posted by: LightningStrikesHere
a reply to: smyleegrl
just to be clear its not the skeleton of the biblical 'Noah"
Spoken like someone who waded in after reading the title but none of the OP where smyleegrl pointed this out
out...
This is fascinating, I wonder what else they have hidden back there?
originally posted by: Hanslune
Skeletons from that period and location are rare due to the acidic soil and the depth you need to go to find them, a DNA analysis of that gentleman will be of great interest.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Hanslune
Skeletons from that period and location are rare due to the acidic soil and the depth you need to go to find them, a DNA analysis of that gentleman will be of great interest.
funny how human skeletons that old are rare but hundreds of thousand year old dinosaurs with soft tissue seem almost common, sorta
interesting