fighter jets escort ufo video

youtu.be..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">UFO escorted by Air Force Fighters: youtu.be...

Just seen this for the first time so it's new to me.

What's the take on this? Fake, undecided?

that clip is almost as old as the internet itself

Super old. Too low in the first part of the sighting I believe one wing is missing lol

a reply to: Walkingsenseless

Here's an interesting thread on this, from 2011:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I think the consensus was that it was CGI.

a reply to: Walkingsenseless

Thanks, I needed a good laugh! It is undeniable CGI. If you can't determine that yourself, please detatch yourself from modern media in general. It's a pretty obvious fake.

Looks like cgi to me. See the blocky outline in the screen capture?

They should have taken more time to blend in the ufo frame by frame.

a reply to: Walkingsenseless

How about you telling us what you think of it?

originally posted by: Walkingsenseless
youtu.be..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">UFO escorted by Air Force Fighters: youtu.be...

Just seen this for the first time so it's new to me.

What's the take on this? Fake, undecided?

Fake. It's just CGI

a reply to: shaneslaughta

The blocky outline is due to mpg compression of the video and not some cgi composition artifact. Having the original uncompressed footage will help make a better assessment of any cgi possibility.

As for my initial thoughts on the video, I am yet to see one ufo video get through these boards without some level of plausible deniability attached to it. With an official government / military policy of non disclosure being in effect for some time, this is the current situation. Sure some videos are fake as it makes a good strawman argument. When reviewing the mass and quality of ufo witnesses, it does make sense to keep your eyes open.

a reply to: kwakakev

Then why does it only show up on the ufo only? (That i notice)

One would think (Assuming) it wold show up across the entire video.

Obviously even before you can say it's CGI, you can know it's a fake due to the speed of the planes.

Can anyone here make videos like that? Should have a thread for members homemade fake movies. Could even have a contest to see who could make the best ones.

No cheating by bringing in real stuff though.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Can anyone here make videos like that? Should have a thread for members homemade fake movies. Could even have a contest to see who could make the best ones.

No cheating by bringing in real stuff though.

We have this contest here, and it's been going on for many years, see any thread for the videos.

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: kwakakev

Then why does it only show up on the ufo only? (That i notice)

One would think (Assuming) it wold show up across the entire video.

Because the saucer is a round object and the compression naturally tends to work on squares, hence we see corners. The planes are irregular in shape and less likely to have corners added to them.

About a year ago I extracted every frame from that video and I do not remember seeing the image shown above that shows the wing tips missing. There are many reasons those wing tips could be missing and the least likely reason would be cgi quite simply because when somebody creates a fake they can put in whatever they want. If I'd gone to the trouble of creating that video dont you think I'd have made sure the wing tips were there?

I'm not saying whether its real or fake, I'm just saying the evidence for it being cgi within this thread (so far) is as shaky as the video itself!

originally posted by: rickymouse
Can anyone here make videos like that? Should have a thread for members homemade fake movies. Could even have a contest to see who could make the best ones.

No cheating by bringing in real stuff though.

I like that idea

CGI is always obvious when most of the video is slightly out of focus and the "ufo" is sharp as heck.

Of course when done by a serious cgi company like in Hollywood movies, its far harder to tell because they take care to make everything right.

This one is clearly amateur created.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Can anyone here make videos like that? Should have a thread for members homemade fake movies. Could even have a contest to see who could make the best ones.

No cheating by bringing in real stuff though.

Start the thread, man!

Great idea...

The video is CGI and this is the guy that created it.


Here's the original.


Credit to free_spirit for supplying the name Here

so who made the clip? has anyone claimed to be the creator of it? if not, why not? what was the point?

could be legit.

ETA - ok just saw the previous comment. noted.


ETA (2) the previous video means nothing. what has that to do with the 'ufo' vid?

originally posted by: RoScoLaz4
so who made the clip? has anyone claimed to be the creator of it? if not, why not? what was the point?

could be legit.

ETA - ok just saw the previous comment. noted.

ETA (2) the previous video means nothing. what has that to do with the 'ufo' vid?

"the previous video means nothing. what has that to do with the 'ufo' vid?"
Distraction.

People could post the most legit vid and others would shout "CGI" yet most of them are just parroting what they've heard others say.
As I said above, pointing to missing wing tips as proof of it being cgi is silly because the point of cgi is one can put in whatever one wishes, no need for missing wing tips!

Of the many vids out there, real or not, the one in the op is one of the better ones. I think the problem is the original vid has been copied and re-formated, leading to too much noise, giving the impression its been poorly made, the original was very good, and did not show planes with missing wing tips.