It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Daedalus
The health insurance industry is squeezing the working class dry, and then costing our dying parents every last penny they have saved in the name of capitalism. Part of the oligarchy that is firmly in place.
Have you ever seen how health care works outside the US?
The statistics say a lot about the state of US health care compared to the rest of the world.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: bbracken677
Promote the General Welfare. Part of the constitution.
It is in the General Welfare's best interest to curb the unwanted baby problem.
originally posted by: Loveaduck
a reply to: nenothtu
Sounds like youre a family man. Drawing a nice picture of your hearth and home. And a missus too..... lucky guy.
I am not sure how Hobby Lobby is making abortion out of a medicine that keeps a fertilized egg from sticking to the womb.
If they are calling this abortion, I am calling "war" murder.
It is curious how a handful of men can be entrusted with a decision that doesn't affect any of them. Interesting too how millions of women have to let 5 men decide their choices. Doesn't seem all that Democratic.
originally posted by: dawnstar
the women who are dropped from hobby lobby's insurance plan will still get their birth control coverage and I would be surprised if they have to pay more than what they pay for the policy hobby lobby is offering them
we the tax payers will pay it!
I mean it's only fair! After all these women just might be shelling money out of their pockets every week to the gov't to pay for the poor's whatever they need or the gov't feels they should have!!!
originally posted by: adjensen
My boss didn't buy me breakfast this morning! My employer is denying my access to breakfast!
If he doesn't buy me lunch, there's a clear agenda here to block my access to all food!
lol
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: nenothtu
Are you employed by Gryphon? If you are, and he gives you $1500 as compensation, can he tell you what you can do with that money? Is he entitled to know what you're spending that money on?
A salaried employee usually gets so many paid vacation days. Does the employer have the right to tell this employee where he can and can't go on vacation? If the employer's religion is against gambling, can the employer tell the employee that he is not allowed to go to Vegas and gamble on his vacation? Should the employer be able to withdraw payment for said vacation because he doesn't like where the employee is going?
The way I look at it, health insurance is part of the compensation package in return for working for the employer, just like salary. You shouldn't even be entitled to know what that compensation is going to be used on. A person works for you, and in return you give them a paycheck, paid vacation days, and health insurance. What they do with those things is not your business. Especially when the employee is paying for part of that insurance out of their own paycheck.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: nenothtu
So you'd rather just remove the whole thing across the board and for everyone it's a "Pay to Play" type thing right???
If so then you should not be supporting this outcome as it is. Because this is not "Across the Board". This is Selective and for Fictional Persons only. Not for real people, yourself included. You realize that since Corps. Don't have to pay now that the Gov. makes up for it. Meaning that since Government money is our Tax dollars, the people now have to pay more while the Corps pay less.
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: nenothtu
originally posted by: jrod
Do you really believe abstinence works?
Do you expect any reasonable person believes in it?
I do.
During those times I was abstinent, I impregnated NO women. Problem solved.
Ok, no offense here, but how much of that was your choice and how much was their choice??? (You don't have to answer that BTW.)
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: nenothtu
Ok. Now I see where you're coming from. To be honest, I really have no argument with your stance either. Other than to say what you see as a "First Step" in the right direction isn't going to work out the way you're hoping it will.
The idea that this is about taking a stand for the People's Rights against the Government is just the narrative of what's happening. This isn't about helping Real People get their power back. This is just how Private Fictional Persons known as Corporations Steal what used to be the Power of the People.
But good luck all the same. I think you'll be upset when you find out this is only a win for Fictional People.
originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: nenothtu
Our taxes pay for the wars we are currently fighting. We spend more killing people than we do trying to help the working class.
The working class is being squeezed left and right for any change they can give up. An extra $5 here, $20 there...it all adds up to thousands a year that are essentially swindled away from what was once the wealthiest group of people on this planet.
While this is happening we bicker over birth control.
originally posted by: nenothtu
It's not even really the ACA that I have a problem with - it's that damnable Individual Mandate that chafes my ass. THAT is the unconstitutional part of it. For the first time in the history of the US, government has REQUIRED individuals to purchase a private product from a private industry that they neither want nor need in order to prop up a flagging and mis-managed private industry. I have a REAL problem with that, and the fascism it ushers in.
originally posted by: olaru12
The flood gates have now been opened for any company claiming "religious reason" to discriminate againt women, gays and anyone else that doesn't meet their religious standards.
news.yahoo.com...
www.forbes.com...
My predictions of a Corporate Theocracy seems to be right on the money....
rhrealitycheck.org...
Remember Orwell's "Animal Farm" All animals are created equal but some are more equal than others.
originally posted by: zackli
a reply to: nenothtu
Brilliant! I never thought of that. Why not just let them pay for it themselves? If they were going to an amusement park and wanted a $5 ride, I'd tell them to go pay for it.
Maybe while we're at it, we can solve the homeless problem too. We just tell the homeless people to get a job like the rest of us... Or do what this guy did: www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: nenothtu
However, the analogy is imperfect - if he hands me cash, then no, he doesn't get to say what I spend it on. IF, however, he's paying bills directly to the provider, then of course he has to know what it's being spent on. Otherwise, he can't pay the bills at all, and I have to.
THIS is the case with most insurance plans - they don't just hand you cash and say "go wild with it" - they pay the medical bills.
The final rules also lay out the accommodation for other non-profit religious organizations - such as non-profit religious hospitals and institutions of higher education - that object to contraceptive coverage. Under the accommodation these organizations will not have to contract, arrange, pay for or refer contraceptive coverage to which they object on religious grounds, but such coverage is separately provided to women enrolled in their health plans at no cost. The approach taken in the final rules is similar to, but simpler than, that taken in the proposed rules, and responds to comments made by many stakeholders.
With respect to an insured health plan, including a student health plan, the non-profit religious organization provides notice to its insurer that it objects to contraception coverage. The insurer then notifies enrollees in the health plan that it is providing them separate no-cost payments for contraceptive services for as long as they remain enrolled in the health plan.
Administration issues final rules on contraception coverage and religious organizations