It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: howmuch4another
I thought emails are stored on a server not a hard drive?
This is such an outrage.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: TDawgRex
I will link an article that says, according to the IRS Manual, the emails would have been stored externally on a Microsoft platform.
liberty unyielding
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: beezzer
Stuff happens. And Bush did worse.
In the article that you link, they actually reference the missing 18 minutes of recording in the Nixon Administration's Oval Office....
That is supposed to give Obama an excuse?
The missing 18 minutes was a very big deal in the Watergate Scandal, and was part of the reason that Nixon was going to be impeached.... had he not resigned from office.
What were they thinking, using that for an excuse? Just goes to show how far they will go with those partisan blinders over their eyes.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
originally posted by: howmuch4another
I thought emails are stored on a server not a hard drive?
This is such an outrage.
Makes you wonder if both sides are in on it.
originally posted by: howmuch4another
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
originally posted by: howmuch4another
I thought emails are stored on a server not a hard drive?
This is such an outrage.
Makes you wonder if both sides are in on it.
It does. Something this deep kind of has to involve some on both sides IMHO.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
originally posted by: howmuch4another
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
originally posted by: howmuch4another
I thought emails are stored on a server not a hard drive?
This is such an outrage.
Makes you wonder if both sides are in on it.
It does. Something this deep kind of has to involve some on both sides IMHO.
they are so wishy washy at the hearings, it is unbelievable, obviously it is la
all for show, they can't let the whole world know they have been in on the REAL cover up
originally posted by: sdcigarpig
If this does go up to the White House, then it is a staling game, and we should watch to see who Obama pardons before he leaves office, cause that will say much and could affect the outcome of the next election.
In any case hopefully both sides will put up a candidate better than the last batch.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: TDawgRex
They are going to get away with this too, damn I am angry, this is all a lie, those emails are stored somewhere, what about the peopleshe sent them too?
originally posted by: teamcommander
a reply to: TDawgRex
I know I am wrong in my opinion of this whole matter, but what real difference can it make by finding out who, and what, is in the emails?
I think the bigger question is; who was denied the tax status for which they applied and on what basis was the denial made.
The law, as passed by congress, was pretty clear. It is her job to allow or deny this tax status to those who apply for it based upon that law.
If she, or anyone else, were guilty of allowing this law to be violated, then there is a case against her. The ones who would be in a position to file a complaint against the IRS are those who can show there was wrong doing involved in their cases. After which the fullest extent of the law should be inforced.
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: TDawgRex
This is B&ll$h1t plain and simple.
The only reason this happened, is to hide the fact that there is wrong doing and it goes very very high-up.
What say you 0bama supporters??? Where are your cries for transparency now?