posted on May, 7 2014 @ 01:21 AM
The real question should be what was 2012 suppossed to be??
And is whatever it was suppossed to be still coming?
If 2012 was related to a Cycle then it is related to time and how we track and mark it,and we know that this has been intentionally altered several
times ,no one knows how many times in history.
So we should likely look for cycles which do not follow the parameters of man measured time and this leaves us with Earth Cycles,so what identifiable
Earth Cycles would be important enough for Humanity to have exerted immense amounts of energy in recording and preserving for us?What Cycle ends near
2012? Not ON 2012 but near 2012.It appears someone doesnt want us to have an accurate timetable for whatever it is for some reason doesnt it?The data
has been suppressed by lies.
We may assume 2012 was intentionally wrong,oh we got our version of the date 2012 right,but is that the version people had 1000 years ago of when 2012
woud roll around?
Geology is the key.It doesnt lie.