It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Exposing nuclear reactors to the elements might not seem like the best idea.
But a team of engineers have revealed how their design to place nuclear reactors in water could save lives.
These plants would use the surrounding water to safeguard themselves in the event of a natural disaster that could cause a meltdown.
When an earthquake or tsunami hits a nuclear plant, that event in itself is not the biggest threat. The greatest danger is actually the after-effects – failing to cool down a reactor core can be deadly.
With that in mind, a team of engineers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have unveiled their designs to place nuclear reactors at sea, where there is an abundance of cooling water for such situations.
The idea is due to be presented at a symposium held by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers this week.
Silcone Synapse
reply to post by flammadraco
Hmm,Underground is a bad idea because if there is an event,radiation could get into the water table/aquifers.
The floating ones are a bad idea because they are still the crazy sort of reactors which we only ever started to build to produce nuclear bombs-electricity was at first really just a blag for joe public to get on board the idea.
Thorium salt pile reactors are the way we would have gone if we were after cleaner,safer energy.
That sort of reactor cannot meltdown.Ever.
But of course you can't make sheet loads of plutonium either.
nugget1
Nuclear reactors are not safe.
There is no such thing as safe nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is not safe.
Nuclear reactors are not safe. They are the ultimate Death Machine.
Nuclear energy is ludicrous.
Nuclear power plant = disaster-in-waiting.
nugget1
Nuclear reactors are not safe.
There is no such thing as safe nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is not safe.
Nuclear reactors are not safe. They are the ultimate Death Machine.
Nuclear energy is ludicrous.
Nuclear power plant = disaster-in-waiting.
A team of engineers has revealed their plans for ocean-based reactors
Silcone Synapse
nugget1
Nuclear reactors are not safe.
There is no such thing as safe nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is not safe.
Nuclear reactors are not safe. They are the ultimate Death Machine.
Nuclear energy is ludicrous.
Nuclear power plant = disaster-in-waiting.
The ones we favor today are real bad news-but Thorium is a much safer alternative-no chance of meltdowns,much shorter half life-days instead of thousands of years..Easy to mine,and very abundant globally.
Much safer-it can even "eat up" the radiation from today's spent nuclear fuel-the really toxic stuff no one knows what to do with.
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 17/4/2014 by Silcone Synapse because: sp
Silcone Synapse
reply to post by greencmp
That has to be the way to go if we want to seriously turn things around for the future.
Lets hope it happens.
grey580
reply to post by flammadraco
There are alot of naval nuclear reactors out on sea right now.
en.wikipedia.org...
Relatively safe.
originally posted by: nugget1
Nuclear reactors are not safe.
There is no such thing as safe nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is not safe.
Nuclear reactors are not safe. They are the ultimate Death Machine.
Nuclear energy is ludicrous.
Nuclear power plant = disaster-in-waiting.:pus:
originally posted by: greencmp
grey580
reply to post by flammadraco
There are alot of naval nuclear reactors out on sea right now.
en.wikipedia.org...
Relatively safe.
But they are all light water reactors that produce waste.