It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where are the environmental impact statement for the shading of the planet from these jet induced haze and graffiti lines in the skies around the world? Just how much is the Jet haze cutting down the Sun and IR energy to the Earth's surface as that is required in environmental impact reporting.
The element boron was added to gasoline offered by Sohio, DX and Richfield of California and nickel was added to Sinclair fuels. While these later additives do not often have a direct interest to collectors of petroleum memorabilia, they are referenced in print ads and on signs and globes. Sohio went so far, of course, as to introduce Boron as a secondary brand.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by MagnumOpus
Where are the environmental impact statement for the shading of the planet from these jet induced haze and graffiti lines in the skies around the world? Just how much is the Jet haze cutting down the Sun and IR energy to the Earth's surface as that is required in environmental impact reporting.
Here read and enjoy...
www.faa.gov...
I have seen the WWII photos of chemtrails from bombers.
When half the planet is upset with chemtrails fogging the skies and making lines to involve aerosol type clouds.
MagnumOpus
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
I have seen the WWII photos of chemtrails from bombers.
Now tell us the type fuel they used to extend the range of bombers. It was war time and they were going for deep range penetration at the range limits of bombers and special fuels with enhancements were needed. Boron was one of the top fuel enhancements to extend range.
Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by MagnumOpus
the visible part of contrails is still just water vapour.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by MagnumOpus
I have seen the WWII photos of chemtrails from bombers.
Please provide us a link for those because that would be amazing when chemtrails weren't made up until the mid 90's by a man named Will Thomas.
So how does something that wasn't even known about get used in WWII?
Aloysius the Gaul
MagnumOpus
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
I have seen the WWII photos of chemtrails from bombers.
Now tell us the type fuel they used to extend the range of bombers. It was war time and they were going for deep range penetration at the range limits of bombers and special fuels with enhancements were needed. Boron was one of the top fuel enhancements to extend range.
the allies had a major advantage in being able to produce and use large amounts of 100/150 "octane" Avgas
the additive used was tetra-ethyl lead. See the MSDS for 115/145 fuel from here listing the antiknock compound as CAS 78-00-2, and you can google that number and get this page on tetraethyl lead.
MagnumOpus
Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by MagnumOpus
the visible part of contrails is still just water vapour.
The issue is why didn't the commercial passenger aircraft of the 60's, 70's, and 80's not have the water vapor turning the sky into a haze and graffiti lines.
Those aircraft didn't need or make persistent clouds, so why did jet planes suddenly turn into cloud makers?
The issue is why didn't the commercial passenger aircraft of the 60's, 70's, and 80's not have the water vapor turning the sky into a haze and graffiti lines.
MagnumOpus
Aloysius the Gaul
MagnumOpus
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
I have seen the WWII photos of chemtrails from bombers.
Now tell us the type fuel they used to extend the range of bombers. It was war time and they were going for deep range penetration at the range limits of bombers and special fuels with enhancements were needed. Boron was one of the top fuel enhancements to extend range.
the allies had a major advantage in being able to produce and use large amounts of 100/150 "octane" Avgas
the additive used was tetra-ethyl lead. See the MSDS for 115/145 fuel from here listing the antiknock compound as CAS 78-00-2, and you can google that number and get this page on tetraethyl lead.
Looks like another admission for chemtrails, as lead isn't water vapor.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by MagnumOpus
The issue is why didn't the commercial passenger aircraft of the 60's, 70's, and 80's not have the water vapor turning the sky into a haze and graffiti lines.
They did you just didn't see them as much because air travel was not as prevalent as it is now.
MagnumOpus
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
It appears the jet industry is trying to mislead folks, because those are chemicals in the exhaust, not just water vapor.
Correct terms would tell any jet exhaust is a chemical emission and provided a chemtrail.
I grew up in those times and white fog trails never persisted or smeared across the entire sky. They were short lived.
I've read the reports on Jet Trails that were black smog that was loaded with carbon that was increasing the warming of the air and the concerns for global warming from jet traffic began.
Jet trails were black back then, and science was all concerned about all the black stuff in the air.
Which means the Jet companies have long conducted a PR campaign to mislead the public about their huge pollution trails, even back in those days.
MagnumOpus
I paid close attention back then ....
I also know the Jet industry got so worried over that environmental effect that they changed the designs to make more fog and not less.
Aloysius the Gaul
MagnumOpus
I paid close attention back then ....
Really - you were following chemtrails in the 60's??
Pray tell....
I also know the Jet industry got so worried over that environmental effect that they changed the designs to make more fog and not less.
They certainly changed engine designs to burn a lot less fuel and save money - got any actual EVIDENCE they did so in order to create more contrails?
Or are we just supposed to take your word for it?edit on 10-3-2014 by Aloysius the Gaul because: quote tag