25% of COVID Vaxxed Now Have VAIDS, Cambridge Scientists Warn

National Insurance Ex-CEO Drops Stunning Statement. Another U-Turn!

The former Chief Executive Officer of NTUC Income publicly expressed his decision to refrain from receiving another COVID-19 booster shot. In a candid exposition, he referenced data to support his choice, stating, "there were 21,282 deaths in 2018... It has now increased to 26,891 in 2022. This increase of 26% is significant and alarming."

He highlighted the mortality uptick not from COVID itself but from other serious conditions such as cancer, heart failure, and stroke. Kin Lian shared insights from his acquaintances who have deduced from extensive reading "that the mRNA vaccine caused the body to suffer a drop in immunity" which potentially contributes to these mortalities. Convinced by the argument that "the vaccine does cause harm to the immune system," and noting that COVID-19 fatalities have substantially declined, he further rationalized his decision by saying, "There is no need to take the risk of having another booster." Kin Lian also mentioned results from an informal survey he conducted, revealing a majority against further vaccinations: "About 88% said that they will not take the booster. 75% think that the vaccine harms the body," he quoted, underscoring the skepticism surrounding the booster within his community.

This article address the topic of this thread and the study in question:

Explosive Study Published in Nature Shakes the Core of mRNA Technology!

Well, a bombshell study has just been published in Nature with what might be the most complex title ever. The study’s name, “N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting,” was written by 20 authors, mainly from the University of Cambridge and Oxford University Hospital, and it's creating a buzz in the scientific world.

Let me say that this study is damning to the mRNA platform—not only vaccines but also everything related to mRNA.

This study highlights a process known as "ribosomal frameshifting." Try to memorize this term because if my suspicions are correct, these words will keep appearing in various commentaries in the coming months.

Let me break it down in layman's terms:

Most of us now know that mRNA is used to send instructions to our cells to manufacture Spike Protein. Well, mRNA occurs naturally in our body, but the problem with natural mRNA is that it breaks down really fast. To “extend” the lifespan of mRNA to make vaccines, the scientists at Pfizer and Moderna swapped out a small component of the mRNA and replaced it with "N1-methylpseudouridine” (or simply pseudouridine if you have followed the scientific discussions). This is why calling it “mRNA” is erroneous; we should call it modRNA (modified RNA).

This new study discovered that adding in pseudouridine in the vaccine can disrupt the usual process of protein production in our cells.

a reply to: andy06shake

by disinformation sites?

I'm not saying I believe this information or even believe slaynews but to use propaganda sites as your source of "fact checks" doesn't help lol

a reply to: FlyersFan

The body tries to kill itself

I inherited mine since birth on my mother side. I cant pass it on to my children. I have Mitochrondrial Myopathy. Confirmed by a muscle biopsy via The Cleveland Clinic.

Mine in on the protein side as if I each too much protein it spills into the blood a high Creatin Kinease CK. Doctors told me that my body begins to eat its own muscle tissue and that is in the blood. I take a daily cocktail of vitamins as there is NO cure. I 24 / 7 ache, am sore and have muscle pain. I try to block it out mentally.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

If I'm reading this article right .... a Cambridge study says that 25% of all people COVID vaxxed have autoimmune issues now. As someone with autoimmune problems (Sjogrens), I can say from first hand experience that autoimmune issues are serious. The body tries to kill itself.

25% of COVID Vaxxed Now Have VAIDS, Cambridge Scientists Warn

A bombshell study conducted by top scientists at the world-renowned Cambridge University in England has concluded that 25 percent of all people vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots now have Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

According to the study, one in four people who received a Covid mRNA injection suffered an “unintended immune response.” However, the scientists note in their paper that the “unintended immune response” was “created by a glitch.” While the Cambridge scientists and corporate media outlets attribute the damage to the immune systems as a “glitch” or “unintended” response, experts have been raising the alarm for some time about the effects on individuals’ immune systems.

]The Cambridge study found Covid shots create a “nonsensical and harmless protein,” that would be attacked by the body. This response leads to an immune system flare-up. Of course, the immune system flaring up is not a “harmless” issue.

Thick as #.

a reply to: kwaka

Just to let you know you made no sense and if a protein was made we already have in our body so what. Next our immune system just doesn't work that way B cells target viruses they match a portion of the virus creating a key. This key is used to identify and destroy the virus. There is no way for it to create a key to attack proteins. Autoantibody production itself is often insufficient to cause clinical features of autoimmune disease. And is caused through a genetic defect in the individual. Believed caused by lack of certain proteins in the body.

So let's say this VAIDS does not exist it was created by some website thinking hey we could throw vaccine in front of aids and there we go. Aids attacks white blood cells no vaccine ever made has the ability to do that. Even aids is at the point we know how to cure it however antiretrovirals can keep HIV replication in check indefinitely. This is why you don't hear about aids deaths anymore its no longer a death sentence.

a reply to: dragonridr

Just to let you know you made no sense and if a protein was made we already have in our body so what.

Thanks for the feedback. If it was that easy to describe just what exactly is going on with the immune system and microbiology we would not be in this mess. For a more basic explanation of what goes on with the variations of mNRA in the vax, does this help?



Do you want your cells wasting their time and resources on making garbage?

a reply to: kwaka

Your body makes tons of proteins that go unused expires and more is made. What you should be concerned with is if you jave low levels of proteins then you end up with problems too many not a problem you only use what you need. 😉

Agent K always said the best place to look was the World Weekly News....

originally posted by: FlyersFan

If I'm reading this article right .... a Cambridge study says that 25% of all people COVID vaxxed have autoimmune issues now. As someone with autoimmune problems (Sjogrens), I can say from first hand experience that autoimmune issues are serious. The body tries to kill itself.

25% of COVID Vaxxed Now Have VAIDS, Cambridge Scientists Warn

A bombshell study conducted by top scientists at the world-renowned Cambridge University in England has concluded that 25 percent of all people vaccinated with Covid mRNA shots now have Vaccine-Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

According to the study, one in four people who received a Covid mRNA injection suffered an “unintended immune response.” However, the scientists note in their paper that the “unintended immune response” was “created by a glitch.” While the Cambridge scientists and corporate media outlets attribute the damage to the immune systems as a “glitch” or “unintended” response, experts have been raising the alarm for some time about the effects on individuals’ immune systems.

]The Cambridge study found Covid shots create a “nonsensical and harmless protein,” that would be attacked by the body. This response leads to an immune system flare-up. Of course, the immune system flaring up is not a “harmless” issue.

I believe that the source paper they are talking about is this one:

N1-methylpseudouridylation of mRNA
causes +1 ribosomal frameshifting

The source paper does not say anything like the Slate article alleges. Specifically, I have searched the paper for the quoted words in the article (which I have also highlighted above for clarity):

- Neither the percentage "25%", nor the phrase "25 percent", appears anywhere in the paper in association with those who are vaccinated.
- Neither the acronym "VAIDS", nor the phrase "vaccine acquired immune deficiency syndrome", appear in the paper, nor is VAIDS a real medical condition.
- The phrase "one in four" does not occur it the paper.
- The word "nonsensical" does not appear in the paper.
- The word "glitch" does not appear in the paper.
- The word "unintended" does not appear in the paper.
- The word "harmless" does not appear in the paper.

The article picked a complex paper full of jargon, which is likely to confuse people unfamiliar with the subject, and then lied about what was in the paper.

This thread should be moved to the hoax bin.

originally posted by: chr0naut
The article picked a complex paper full of jargon, which is likely to confuse people unfamiliar with the subject, and then lied about what was in the paper.

This thread should be moved to the hoax bin.

The fact that the OP or the article did not bother to link to the actual paper that supposedly made the claim is always suspicious that the paper never states what the op or article claims!

originally posted by: kwaka
Immunogenicity of lipid nanoparticles and its impact on the efficacy of mRNA vaccines and therapeutics

Vaccines and autoimmunity are closely related. Vaccines can trigger an autoimmune reaction in that they can modulate the host-immune response to antigens66,67. Various autoantibodies that cause lupus have been observed in vaccinated dogs68. Such symptoms are mainly arthritis, vasculitis, central nervous system (encephalitis, demyelination) or peripheral nervous system involvement (Guillain‒Barré syndrome), or thrombocytopenia67. Several studies have indicated that the key response of autoimmune diseases is the type 1 interferon response.

And of course the disease causing pathogens elicit autoimmune over-response too, but usually are way more than thousands of times more likely to do so than therapeutics and immunizations.

In COVID-19, it is usually the cytokine storm caused by immune over-response due to the reaction to the pathogen that is the primary cause of death.

Close to 2% (in first-world countries) of those who had medically confirmed cases of COVID-19 died from immune overreaction. In the case of the immunizations, it is about 0.00002% (one in 5 million who have had a dose).

originally posted by: visitedbythem
A couple months ago, my dad was talking to one of my cousins. I think she is 70. She told him she was diagnosed with aids. It was not acquired sexually. I didnt understand how she could get it, but my dad said other things could cause it too. We had thought she passed on the vaccines. That was what she said after they were available. She did eventually get 2 shots. Im not sure which ones. We both suspected that it was the MRNA injections.

Worldwide, 13.53 billion doses of COVID-19 immunizations have been administered.

If the immunizations caused AIDS, and it has been administered subcutaneously where it directly interacts with the blood, why aren't there 13.53 billion cases of AIDS?

originally posted by: navigator70

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: FlyersFan

Slaynews.com is on one of the lists of sites that intentionally publish hoaxes and disinformation.

Ignoring the study by dismissing the messenger is a fine example of a lack of intellectual curiosity. But thats exactly what the puppet masters want. Dont question them, just bend the knee and fall in line with the approved narrative..

I didn't ignore the source paper. I believe that the publishers of the Telegraph and Slate were hoping that people would not critically question what they published.

originally posted by: navigator70

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: navigator70

Well, when it's clear who and what the messenger is.

If you wish to entertain the anti-vax mumbo-jumbo that's up to you.

As to puppet masters, and what "they" want, do tell?

Question whatever you please but its real tangible facts and evidence you require to support the argument that 1 in 4 people have your vaids nonsense.

Slaynews.com or the Telegraph article presents or proves nothing of the sort.

This is just more deflection from the study. But for those who fell for the 'safe and effective' lies, ignorance is probably the safest bet. The placebo effect is a real thing.

What evidence was there that was strong enough to cause you to think the immunizations were not both safe or effective?

Could it be that you have fallen for some sensationalist doom-porn?

Just watch as the non-culling of the human race continues over longer and longer time frames, because there's still no evidence of a great reset or of significant reductions in populations.

Immunizations work to boost immune response. They aren't a magic shield, and they take time and vast swathes of immunized population to have an overall effect.

And sometimes people get sick again, even if they have already have an immune response. That is why people sometime get sick more than once with the same disease, from the same pathogen. It just happens to be that way.

a reply to: chr0naut

The article picked a complex paper full of jargon, which is likely to confuse people unfamiliar with the subject, and then lied about what was in the paper. This thread should be moved to the hoax bin.

So a paper that you do not understand and is confused by, just call it lies and put in the hoax bin?

To our knowledge, this is the first report that mRNA modification affects ribosomal frameshifting. Alongside this impact on host T cell immunity, the off-target effects of ribosomal frameshifting could include increased production of new B cell antigens...

Although we have shown that translation of N1-methylpseudouridylated mRNA leads to +1 ribosomal frameshifting in vitro and in cultured cells, it is conceivable that other mistranslation events (such as leaky scanning) could also contribute to T cell responses to +1 frameshifted peptide antigens...

These findings are of particular importance to our fundamental understanding of how ribonucleotide modification affects mRNA translation, and for designing and optimizing future mRNA-based therapeutics to avoid mistranslation events that may decrease efficacy or increase toxicity.

From a coding perspective, unintended frameshifting will mess up data and how it is interpreted. As for what results exactly is this a problem and how much of a problem is hard to decipher with the language used. It is one area where more research is required to get a clearer picture of the situation.

originally posted by: navigator70

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise


So the study not actually mentioning yet alone supporting the claim in the title isn't important?

That is intellectual curiosity?

Thats how cover-ups work. It takes intellectual curiosity to see beyond the studies agenda.

Are you denying that the jab is producing unintended proteins that cause the body to have immune system flair-ups, or that it is not a type of VAIDs?

I am, totally.

If the immunizations even slightly were doing what is often claimed, there would be tens of billions of deaths, all within hours to weeks of the immunizations.

a reply to: chr0naut

What evidence was there that was strong enough to cause you to think the immunizations were not both safe or effective?

This is one thread that presents a strong case:

Vaccinations and Autism

Basically, how Fauci has refused to release a study that compares the overall health between the vaccinated and unvaccinated is a big, bad, ugly red flag. With the studies I have seen by independent doctors and researchers, lot of trouble and bad news in the vaccinated population. With the childhood vaccination schedule just getting bigger and bigger despite such troubling data is criminally insane.

originally posted by: kwaka
a reply to: chr0naut

The article picked a complex paper full of jargon, which is likely to confuse people unfamiliar with the subject, and then lied about what was in the paper. This thread should be moved to the hoax bin.

So a paper that you do not understand and is confused by, just call it lies and put in the hoax bin?

I do understand the paper. It doesn't say what the articles infer it is saying.

I was just pointing out that few people would understand the biochemistry being discussed.

To our knowledge, this is the first report that mRNA modification affects ribosomal frameshifting. Alongside this impact on host T cell immunity, the off-target effects of ribosomal frameshifting could include increased production of new B cell antigens...

Although we have shown that translation of N1-methylpseudouridylated mRNA leads to +1 ribosomal frameshifting in vitro and in cultured cells, it is conceivable that other mistranslation events (such as leaky scanning) could also contribute to T cell responses to +1 frameshifted peptide antigens...

These findings are of particular importance to our fundamental understanding of how ribonucleotide modification affects mRNA translation, and for designing and optimizing future mRNA-based therapeutics to avoid mistranslation events that may decrease efficacy or increase toxicity.

That section is explaining that such frameshifting would lead to immune responses against these other proteins too, as well as against the non-frameshifted proteins.

In my view, this broadens immune response, the exact opposite of inhibiting it as was implied by the articles.

Remember that there was a concern that the virus might mutate in ways that eluded the response to the specific immunization sequence. This has actually occurred in the Delta and later strains, but they have now refactored the mRNA to fit both versions of the protein (bivalence).

Creating an immune response to a similar sequence causes an overall response that encompasses more latitude.

From a coding perspective, unintended frameshifting will mess up data and how it is interpreted. As for what results exactly is this a problem and how much of a problem is hard to decipher with the language used. It is one area where more research is required to get a clearer picture of the situation.

And, in the paper, they did suggest avenues of research that would lead to more efficient mRNA design.

But further research will no doubt have unanticipated dividends.

a reply to: chr0naut

Meaning, in the end, it could very well attack...itself?