What Bmw got when they mated a beaver with a block of steel!

NOTICE: AboveTopSecret.com management is now enforcing new standards for the opening posts of threads.

Once seen it can’t be unseen, one word for bmw they are now officially fugly.

This: www.drive.com.au...

Though I guess if you are dumb enough to pay over 200k for this car, the the jokes on u.

oh, great, another city offroader... I'm really looking forward to city tanks, it can't be long they don't feel safe in these pesky offroaders anymore.

a reply to: Terpene

Agreed these fools who drive suvs in my area are so useless, they have zero ability to breath let alone drive.

Though riding a push bike the near misses j have had is scary.

a reply to: robsmith

Typical looking SUV. The grill is not a good look.

Yeah, overpriced. But BMW always was.

Cheers

Possibly the ugliest front clip I have ever seen in a car.

a reply to: Flatcoat

Agreed! this is a hot front clip:


journal.classiccars.com...

Older cars have both style and substance.

Still more beautiful then Fiat Multipla imo.

It makes me think of butterfly wings that will detach and fly away.

It's fugly. Like most all SUV's. Is it me or do all these SUV look alike and they also look like cross training shoes.

originally posted by: robsmith
a reply to: Flatcoat

Agreed! this is a hot front clip:


journal.classiccars.com...

Older cars have both style and substance.

Studied transportation design out of high school (Art Center College in Pasadena, CA), until I decided to switch majors to something practical.

The biggest "problem" with vehicle design nowadays is that, due to safety requirements, aerodynamic efficiency requirements, and "shared platform utility" the designers are constrained to a very limited form factor.

There just isn't much room left to "create" in.

These considerations were far less of a concern back in the 50's and 60's (the Golden Age of design IMO).

Heck, there was a time I could identify the year, make, and model of a car, in the dark, by its taillights alone.

But just recently, a Mercedes, a Chevy, a Toyota, a Ford, and a Nissan were diagonally parked, nose first, in a lot and from the side, looking just from the leading edge of the wheel well forward, you couldn't tell one from the other.

A damn shame!

Basically
Money
Wasted

a reply to: eXia7

Big
Massive
Wankers

BMW owners support the 4th Reich, Fascism and are to stupid to know it. Just look at ole Adolf and then take a gander at the grill of every BMW since. Symbolism.

a reply to: StratosFear

If the Third Reich had an "official car" it would have been Daimler ("Mercedes" after WWI due to post-war anti-German sentiment) - Benz.

BMW has been using an iteration of the double oval since before WWII.

Not "symbolism",

Tradition, and Heritage.

My donkeys ass is more attractive than that but doesn’t have that same new leather smell, kind if torn here guys, looking for a friend

a reply to: robsmith

Jaguar fpace svr... I do like this one ... It is the next car I will be getting .. I have a jaguar xe at the moment upgrading soon to the Svr .... It's a beast... 0 to 100km an hour in 3.8 seconds .... Fast for an SUV
That BMW is fugly as

a reply to: robsmith
I have a blacked out 1972 Pontiac Grand prix ..... I love old Pontiacs

a reply to: Mantiss2021

There’s no individualism in car design. Understand it’s all grown safety etc etc. though all cars fool the same.

Though some design features are questionable sechbas Kia with the indicators on the rear bumper below your eye line. Toyota Camry with the front indicators of the front bumper mounted so low its not easy to spot them.

A great design for safety was the Volvo 850 the rear lenses wer mouthed vertically, and highly visible.

Plus brake light and indicator sizes are so small now.

a reply to: Freeborn

Lol!

a reply to: Hiram33

That looks hot. I bought a Toyota Kluger or highlander recently, it’s a pretty good driver.


Though no CD player