It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MrGashler
a reply to: VoiceofReality
To counter this with my own anecdotal evidence. the vast majority of the people I know refused the vax and still have never received it. Most of us caught covid and experienced mild to moderate symptoms. My mother, who has COPD, caught it and it was basically just a cold. I can count on one hand the number of people I personally know who got the vax, and out of the 4 that I know, 2 of them died of 'heart related issues' within a day to 3 days of receiving the vax. A third had a stroke about a month after receiving the vax. The fourth seems to be doing okay.
How many people died from the COVID shot? Do vaccines actually cause autism? Steve Kirsch has looked at the data.
originally posted by: VoiceofReality
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
a reply to: PrivateAngel
Operation Warpspeed sounds kinda like a military name
Hopefully, stats are being kept on how healthy vs unhealthy Covid-19 vaccinated vs non-vaccinated people are.
How broad of an sample size are you looking for? I can tell you in my personal circles almost everyone I know got vaxxed in the beginning (not many are getting them anymore due to the drop in severity of COVID cases and outcomes) and not a single one every had a side effect or anything bad happen to them.
I do however know 2 people who died from COVID who were rabid anti-vaxxers.
That probably goes against what most believe around here, but that's what I observed in my own circles.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: Euronymous2625
It's a long game, bro. You'll start seeing effects in like 5-20 years or so. Just you wait! 🙄
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: PrivateAngel
4 years later, is there any sign of this take-over of humanity as having happened?
Really? Can you explain how you could possibly know that, when the best and brightest of humanity don't?
And the dates keep getting further away.
Perhaps in 500 years? - In 500 years every single person who was given a shot will be dead. Dead, I tell you!!!!
originally posted by: EyeoftheHurricane
originally posted by: VoiceofReality
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
a reply to: PrivateAngel
Operation Warpspeed sounds kinda like a military name
Hopefully, stats are being kept on how healthy vs unhealthy Covid-19 vaccinated vs non-vaccinated people are.
How broad of an sample size are you looking for? I can tell you in my personal circles almost everyone I know got vaxxed in the beginning (not many are getting them anymore due to the drop in severity of COVID cases and outcomes) and not a single one every had a side effect or anything bad happen to them.
I do however know 2 people who died from COVID who were rabid anti-vaxxers.
That probably goes against what most believe around here, but that's what I observed in my own circles.
Would those two by any chance have been put on a ventilator or been given Remdesavir? Just saying, those details are important. I know several people who were given Remdesavir and it nearly killed them.
originally posted by: G1111B1234
a reply to: chr0naut
Excess deaths are high world wide. It was meant to be subtle. In uk I believe next year all flu vaccines etc will be this new MRNA. This is what’s going to cause more deaths. Follow Dr John Campbell as he’s always been about the evidence.
originally posted by: Euronymous2625
originally posted by: chr0naut
They are correct about exactly one thing. EVERYONE who "g0T t3h jAb" , without exception, will die someday.
Some census takers who falsified information during the 2020 count didn’t have their work redone fully, weren’t fired in a timely manner and in some cases even received bonuses, according to the U.S. Commerce Department’s watchdog group.
The findings released Friday by the Office of Inspector General raise concerns about possible damage to the quality of the once-a-decade head count that determines political power and federal funding,
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Census Bureau denied any attempts to systemically falsify information during the 2020 head count used to determine the allocation of congressional seats and federal spending, even as more census takers told The Associated Press they were pressured to do so.
The Census Bureau statement was issued Monday night in response to AP reports of census workers who said they were told by supervisors to enter fake answers on the head-count forms in order to close cases in the waning days of the census.
After the AP reported the allegations in Massachusetts and Indiana, 10 other census takers stepped forward and told similar stories of being rushed to close cases as they faced a shortened deadline to end field operations for the 2020 census — even if it meant getting things wrong.
The U.S. Census Bureau today released the most detailed estimates to date of the undercount and overcount in the 2020 Census, known as coverage error.
Coverage error, a measure of disagreement between the census counts and independent estimates of the population size, occurs when people are not counted (undercount) or are counted more than once or were included in error (overcount).
The results show that there was no statistically significant net national coverage error. In effect, there was not a statistically significant overcount or undercount for the total population. But there were some populations that were undercounted or overcounted such as young children, older adults and working-age men.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: UpIsNowDown2
a reply to: PrivateAngel
Operation Warpspeed sounds kinda like a military name
Hopefully, stats are being kept on how healthy vs unhealthy Covid-19 vaccinated vs non-vaccinated people are.
As a side-note, I don't understand the need for a census, if you count births and immigrants, subtract deaths and emmigrants, which is gov reckord, why a census?