It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity
The strongest argument for all of this being true, or potentially true is the behavior of officials and agencies and how they treated people so horribly when they promoted and executed the illegal lockdowns, cancelling people, holding businesses hostage, and all MSM companies and their owners supporting it all, plus helping it happen with their relentless propaganda.
And illegal mandates that only a few states resisted and didn't allow it. And it is still being promoted that it was all legitimate and still safe and effective.
I have some small portable UV exam lights, but haven't tried to shine them on any people I know that are jabbed.
I would like to test this out though.
People don't like UV lights being shined in their face.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Just in case anyone thinks this is BS, we have a Ph.D. scientist who started checking the luminous glow reported on alternative news sites. He checked his wife out who was Vaccinated and got a positive response. He bought some expensive equipment and did some in-depth checking, The glow started to grow from the nose and spread. rumble.com...
As an aside women glow in the vaginal areas and the Aureoles, which seems to suggest a target on the reproductive system.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Scratchpost
People tend to end up with the likes of Cataracts if their eyes are exposed to UV for prolonged periods of time.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0nautnuets would be pointless.
You have completely ignored the fact that this was used in Vietnam and admitted to under a congressional inquiry. The point is to have a Vietnamese person glowing for two minutes is rather pointless.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity
I have 2 UV flashlights, 365 nanometer. It shows a lot of materials fluorescing. I'll test it out tomorrow at work on someone. Just have to avoid shining it in their eyes.
Just to clarify, I don't think this is BS at all. Those Nano lipids and other non conventional materials in the Pfizer and other jabs have all kinds of junk in them. They don't metabolize from the body, so they will be somewhere still.
Important to note, the video says look for orange fluorescence. Different things and materials, including on the human body won't be orange unless it's the right material to fluoresce orange. Makeup and cosmetics will usually be very dark, even black. Knowing this, if orange is found like in the video, it can be investigated by checking some of those jab ingredients, I'm sure there's a list and it will already be known how they fluoresce, if not will have to investigate it further. (That's how science works naysayers )
People don't usually fluoresce any orange anywhere on the body.
People who accepted the experimental jabs that think this is BS are just scared because they gave in to tyranny.
The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day. Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there. So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: annonentity
The strongest argument for all of this being true, or potentially true is the behavior of officials and agencies and how they treated people so horribly when they promoted and executed the illegal lockdowns, cancelling people, holding businesses hostage, and all MSM companies and their owners supporting it all, plus helping it happen with their relentless propaganda.
And illegal mandates that only a few states resisted and didn't allow it. And it is still being promoted that it was all legitimate and still safe and effective.
I have some small portable UV exam lights, but haven't tried to shine them on any people I know that are jabbed.
I would like to test this out though.
People don't like UV lights being shined in their face.
But people go to dance clubs and voluntarily 'suffer' through hours and hours of UV lighting, especially if you feed them alcohol, and play doof-doof music.
And our eyes aren't that visually sensitive to UV, so I don't know how people would even know if a UV light was being shone in their eyes. If the power was great enough, there could be UV burns, but like sunburn, you wouldn't know until hours later.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day.
Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there.
So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time. It is just an anomalous observation.
This stuff leaves a forensic mark because it does something in the real world. These MAC addresses are interesting and most probably are the batch number of the vaccine because when wifi addresses started way back in the day they were in the format of.000001 which would have been the first MAC addresses ever assigned. and as the devices became more numerous the numbers changed to letters. It is illegal to have an unassigned MAC address, for a civilian that is.
So the fact that unassigned MAC addresses exist, there is only one agency that can get away with it no prize for who that would be. It is also interesting that the coding of these unassigned addresses doesn't clash with the millions of existing MAC addresses. But make no bones about it if you have been vaccinated among other things you have had to be chipped what else would you call it. www.bitchute.com... Problem number one is whatever way you look at it you have an operating system ready to connect, and can a random connect? it might be as innocuous as biometric data for health surveillance but I doubt it, but it is definitely something.
which was never supposed to come to light.
originally posted by: randomtangentsrme
originally posted by: annonentity
Here is an interesting couple of reports, one from the way back days when the Cholera vaccine had a substance in it to mark friendly Vietnamese, it would make them glow under UV light.www.bitchute.com...
Then we come across this one where a presenter talks about the "Mark of the Beast" phenomenon or rather the lack of it then he suddenly seems to have found the eye of the horus phenomenon in vaccinated individuals under UV light.www.bitchute.com... It causes an orange glow on the forehead and the bridge of the nose. A great one for the conspiracy theorist as it seems that UV street lighting became all the rage, and UV scanners at airports purportedly could tell if you were vaccinated or not.I hope this does not turn out to be true like the Calimari clots and the magnetic shot sites, and the yet-to-be-debunked MAC addresses emanating from the vaccinated individuals. It looks like a lot of money was being spent on infrastructure, with regards to blue street lighting and five G. Then it seemed to have stalled what happened? along with the FEMA camps the massive stockpile of coffins owned by the CDC. Or is this all waiting in the wings ready for a "go order"? some strange # is going on when you add it all together.
I deal with UV lighting all the time. I had to get the jab 3 times to keep my job.
I personally own 6 UV fixtures.
No marks of any kind on me.
You get the usual florescence.
No mark of the beast, but having been a church musician, maybe I have some extra protections.
This is all BS.
originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: chr0naut
The technology that Darpa has will be top secret and years ahead of what we see day to day. Any site that alludes to it, is on the uncensored channels, the stuff is secret so no surprise there. So anyone showing the effects of this tech has to be taken on trust, usually, unsophisticated people observing the same thing from different countries have a low probability of wasting time. It is just an anomalous observation.
This stuff leaves a forensic mark because it does something in the real world. These MAC addresses are interesting and most probably are the batch number of the vaccine because when wifi addresses started way back in the day they were in the format of.000001 which would have been the first MAC addresses ever assigned. and as the devices became more numerous the numbers changed to letters. It is illegal to have an unassigned MAC address, for a civilian that is. So the fact that unassigned MAC addresses exist, there is only one agency that can get away with it no prize for who that would be. It is also interesting that the coding of these unassigned addresses doesn't clash with the millions of existing MAC addresses. But make no bones about it if you have been vaccinated among other things you have had to be chipped what else would you call it. www.bitchute.com... Problem number one is whatever way you look at it you have an operating system ready to connect, and can a random connect? it might be as innocuous as biometric data for health surveillance but I doubt it, but it is definitely something.
which was never supposed to come to light.