It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An Arizona pro-parent school board member, Heather Rooks, who was recently elected into office, leaked and alerted parents to a radical science curriculum that is currently being considered in the Peoria Unified School District.
Within a month of being at the school board, Rooks leaked a proposed textbook that would be used in the district's high school. She said she was alarmed that the science curriculum discounted the reality of biological sex.
According to a post by Nicole Solas of the Independent Women's Forum, the textbook said, "The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Muldar
This "curriculum" is like right out of the communist playbook. A former KGB said this sort of stuff was what they used during Stalin's time to subvert the spiritual freedom of the people to demoralize people so they submit to the state and not a higher power that gives them moral integrity.
It's really hard to believe that people in authority and academia could ever be this stupid and foolish.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Muldar
This "curriculum" is like right out of the communist playbook. A former KGB said this sort of stuff was what they used during Stalin's time to subvert the spiritual freedom of the people to demoralize people so they submit to the state and not a higher power that gives them moral integrity.
It's really hard to believe that people in authority and academia could ever be this stupid and foolish.
Radical science curriculum
originally posted by: Muldar
originally posted by: Gothmog
Radical science curriculum
Which science ?
The science of the church of nonsense ?
Radical. Of course.
Had to be genetics or it didn't count.
Does the ignorant today ever learn ?
Pseudo-science is the correct word.
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Muldar
This "curriculum" is like right out of the communist playbook. A former KGB said this sort of stuff was what they used during Stalin's time to subvert the spiritual freedom of the people to demoralize people so they submit to the state and not a higher power that gives them moral integrity.
It's really hard to believe that people in authority and academia could ever be this stupid and foolish.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Muldar
originally posted by: Gothmog
Radical science curriculum
Which science ?
The science of the church of nonsense ?
Radical. Of course.
Had to be genetics or it didn't count.
Does the ignorant today ever learn ?
Pseudo-science is the correct word.
I think mine was more on target.
originally posted by: midicon
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
a reply to: Muldar
This "curriculum" is like right out of the communist playbook. A former KGB said this sort of stuff was what they used during Stalin's time to subvert the spiritual freedom of the people to demoralize people so they submit to the state and not a higher power that gives them moral integrity.
It's really hard to believe that people in authority and academia could ever be this stupid and foolish.
We don't need the 'spiritual', state or 'higher power'' to give us moral integrity.
In this particular instance, all we need is a little common sense.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuffx2
a reply to: Muldar
If this is allowed to continue the next biological question posed by “academia” will be “what is a minor?”
No joke.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuffx2
a reply to: Muldar
If this is allowed to continue the next biological question posed by “academia” will be “what is a minor?”
No joke.
originally posted by: NightSkyeB4Dawn
originally posted by: NorthOfStuffx2
a reply to: Muldar
If this is allowed to continue the next biological question posed by “academia” will be “what is a minor?”
No joke.
That barn door has already been opened. Toddlers have rights, is already on the table.
"The biochemical, physiological, and anatomical features associated with 'males' and 'females' are turning out to be more complex than previously realized, with many genes involved in their development. We now know that sex is not a binary state, with just two defined outcomes."
originally posted by: quintessentone
OMG children actually being taught the true science get the pitchforks.