It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
EXCLUSIVE-The superintendent of the State of Oklahoma, Ryan Walters, called for Western Heights School District to "immediately" terminate a drag queen they hired to be an elementary school principal.
"It's outrageous to have a drag queen running a school, you know, here in Oklahoma that doesn't line up with Oklahoma values," Walters told Fox News Digital. "I hear from parents every day that are concerned with this woke left-wing indoctrination or schools, this gender theory that continues to be thrust upon our kids. It's completely inappropriate."
The principal of John Glenn Elementary School, Shane Murnan, is a drag queen who goes by the name "Shantel Mandalay," Fox News Digital can confirm. Murnan maintained a separate Facebook page from another called "Shantel Mandalay." According to the page, Murnan was employed as a drag queen at a venue called "The Boom."
"This individual is not fit to lead a school district," Walters said. "It has to stop."
Prosecutors won't appeal porn ruling
Dawn Marks
STILLWATER - Payne County prosecutors will not appeal a judge's ruling to dismiss possession of child pornography charges against a former teacher.
District Attorney Rob Hudson said Tuesday that after Payne County District Judge Donald L. Worthington on Thursday dismissed the charge against Shane Brent Murnan, 31, prosecutors reviewed the case and talked with school officials before making a decision.
"After careful consideration of the issues and whether we would ever be able to prove he was in possession of the deleted materials, we have decided not to appeal," he said. "We're disappointed, but we respect the court's decision."
Police arrested Murnan in August 2001 after a Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation search recovered four deleted
images of children engaged in sex acts, court records state. Police also found 6 grams of marijuana in his home.
www.oklahoman.com...
He was actually CONVICTED by a judge of child porn & drug charges, however, was exonerated on appeal because " they couldn't prove the images were of underage children". Unfortunately, victims of kiddie porn don't have verifiable ID's, so burden of proof releases many predators like this one. Seriously cannot believe how poorly media has presented this minus relevant proof...almost as if they support pedophiles running schools? Regardless of whether their age (one judge agreed they were children), HE HAD PORN IMAGES on his COMPUTER!! Many teachers have been fired for far less. Also, he was chosen in a closed door meeting, outside procedure. Know the facts, present them accurately!
In 2002, a Payne County judge tossed the case due to a lack of proof presented by prosecutors that Murnan, a fifth-grade teacher in a different district at the time, was in possession of any child pornography. The case was later reversed via appeal, The Oklahoman reported at the time, though the record of charges was eventually expunged and Murnan continued his career as an educator, which has now spanned over 25 years.
www.newsweek.com...#:~:text=Murnan's%20personal%20Facebook%20page% 20has,arrested%20on%20child%20porn%20charges.
originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: AlienBorg
This isn't specifically about drag story time.
But it's very telling that they never want to engage with the homeless, or with the elderly, or special needs folks. They only ever want access to children.
According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18.
originally posted by: AlienBorg
Individual States need to outlaw this ideology/movement as fast as possible because the agenda is rather obvious and sinister. I wonder who promoted this person so he could now be the principal of this school. There could be others sympathetic to the cause or members of this ideology who work in the school/district or even local politicians.
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: AlienBorg
From you source:
According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18.
What if the images were of people 18 yrs or older? Without evidence everyone is crucifying this guy.
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
Individual States need to outlaw this ideology/movement as fast as possible because the agenda is rather obvious and sinister. I wonder who promoted this person so he could now be the principal of this school. There could be others sympathetic to the cause or members of this ideology who work in the school/district or even local politicians.
Those who hired him are standing by their decision and him.
Now, Murnan has welcomed the new addition of Carmen Deveraux, whose real name is Paul Caplan Stafford, as a teacher assistant in a kindergarten classroom, according to V1sut. Murnan and Stafford work together at the same nightclub. In screenshots of Facebook posts that appear to have since been deleted, Murnan, with his drag account, welcomes Stafford by his drag name, saying that “the long hours will now pay off.”
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: AlienBorg
From you source:
According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18.
What if the images were of people 18 yrs or older? Without evidence everyone is crucifying this guy.
Defending the drag queen principal? How surprising?!
Your problem is whether it was over or under 18?
The fact that a drag queen was appointed a principal and has been investigated for child pornography didn't ring any bell?
originally posted by: quintessentone
originally posted by: AlienBorg
originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: AlienBorg
From you source:
According to a local report that covered the story, the charges were dismissed because it could not be proven that the images were of individuals under the age of 18.
What if the images were of people 18 yrs or older? Without evidence everyone is crucifying this guy.
Defending the drag queen principal? How surprising?!
Your problem is whether it was over or under 18?
The fact that a drag queen was appointed a principal and has been investigated for child pornography didn't ring any bell?
The police detectives could not prove it was child pron so why crucify him?
Murnan is also being accused of being a drag queen who performs as Miss Shantel Mandalay.