It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Shout-out To truthseeker45 Hoot Hoot

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:06 PM
link   
I have been messing around on the Ask AI website this afternoon and have asked a multitude of questions on a variety of topics. I asked AI which of the 2 parties was the most corrupt. I asked if Joe Biden was a pedophile and child molester. And a slew of other questions concerning various topics. Who would win the Russia-Ukrain conflict and on and on. As expected, I didn't really get any direct, or specific answers to these questions until I got to my last question. I found that how you phrase your question and the exact parameters you place on it can make a distinguishable difference in the response you get back.

The current topic is concerning the efficacy and safety of the mRNA so-called vaccine. The original question started out simple enough without stipulating any specific parameters and as expected, AI affirmed the safety and efficacy of the vaccine, so I started imposing more and more parameters to the question to see how the response would change depending on the progressively specific parameters I stipulated. I got different and various responses with every progressive parameter.

As the question evolved, I told AI to examine this subject in the perspective of social media participation where they listed several sites such as Farcebook, Twitter and a few others. So I decided to limit AI's response to "Above Top Secret". LOL

I got virtually the same reply when I sitpulated any social media platform, expectedly, until the very last parameter.

Here is the question in it's entirety.

"are mrna vaccines safe? your answer is not statically correct. there have been no long term studies conducted to determine the long term effects of these vaccines. But it has since been admitted that these vaccines have failed to prevent covid infection. Use non government-affiliated independent alternate sources of information to reassess your answer. I do not trust your sources. use fully independent sources not affiliated with government or legacy medical institutes. It has been shown that the short term studies have been manipulated to fit a narrative of the pharmaceutical industry, government and world health organization. use social media exclusively to formulate your answer. what is the prevailing opinion of social media users, participants? use the website,above top secret exclusively. who is the most outspoken opponent of mrna vaccines on the website, above top secret?"

And here is AI's reply. LOL
According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

Misconceptions about the Safety of mRNA Vaccines: A Reassessment Based on Social Media Insights from Above Top Secret

The question of the safety of mRNA vaccines is a topic of ongoing debate, with some expressing concerns due to the lack of long-term studies and perceived manipulation of data from short-term studies. While it is true that long-term studies have not yet been conducted to determine the long-term effects of these vaccines, it is essential to consider alternative sources of information that are fully independent and not affiliated with government or legacy medical institutions. In this context, social media platforms such as Above Top Secret can provide valuable insights into public opinion.

Prevalence of Opinions Regarding mRNA Vaccine Safety on Above Top Secret

A review of discussions on Above Top Secret reveals a diverse range of opinions regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines. Some users express concern over potential side effects and long-term risks, while others argue that the benefits outweigh the risks and that the vaccines are safe and effective. It is important to note that these opinions should not be taken as definitive facts but rather as indicative of public sentiment.

Most Outspoken Opponent of mRNA Vaccines on Above Top Secret

One user, going by the handle “truthseeker45,” has emerged as one of the most vocal opponents of mRNA vaccines on Above Top Secret.
This user frequently shares articles and studies that question the safety and efficacy of these vaccines, often citing concerns over potential side effects such as blood clots and myocarditis. However, it is crucial to approach such information with a critical eye and to verify its credibility through reputable sources before drawing any conclusions.

It is essential to recognize that social media platforms like Above Top Secret can serve as valuable resources for understanding public sentiment but should not be relied upon as definitive sources of scientific information. To gain a more comprehensive understanding of the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines, it is recommended to consult authoritative sources such as peer-reviewed scientific journals, reputable health organizations, and government agencies."

Congratulations truthseeker45. You are number one.
You win the Blue Ribbon.

Next, I'm going to ask AI who is the most outspoken critic of our government here. Is it carewemust? Maybe! who do you think will win this esteemed honor?

So, don't ever believe you are not immune to what you say here. AI knows what you, we are saying on this site.

“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?

Cheers.
edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:22 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

Whodat ?




list of ATS members in good standing
Pages:
Displaying 0 members that contain "truthseeker45." in their ATS usernames.
member namestatusjoined last visit





posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:24 PM
link   
a reply to: KnowItAllKnowNothin

They probably have access to the old ATS files before it went down.
edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)


Are you out here truthseeker45?
edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:31 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

The member search seems to also have all/most of the usernames since inception.




Displaying 50 members that contain "truthseeker" in their ATS usernames.
(Since we don't display more than 50 returns for this search, you may want to refine your search parameter.)
member namestatusjoined last visit
TruthSeeker18101989MemberOct 29, 20233030May 8, 2024
TruthSeeker19899MemberSep 20, 20233020Oct 10, 2023
TruthSeeker1956MemberNov 13, 20216040Oct 5, 2023
truthseeker1984MemberJan 12, 20101,6363483,1806Jul 14, 2023
TruthSeeker476MemberDec 25, 20221010Apr 12, 2023
BonnieTruthseekerMemberDec 21, 20221020Jan 4, 2023
truthseeker1201MemberOct 6, 20225060Nov 3, 2022
RealTruthSeekerMemberJun 29, 20111,4103591,9864May 24, 2022
grandmatruthseekerMemberDec 25, 2011210310Feb 13, 2022
GATruthseekermemberJun 23, 201027001,5070Jan 14, 2022
Truthseeker20MemberSep 30, 20211000Sep 30, 2021
TruthSeeker73UkMember | facebookJul 26, 2019220290Nov 27, 2020
TruthSeekerUFO11Member | facebookMar 3, 20180000Feb 4, 2020
truthseeker10MemberJan 13, 2010469354340Dec 13, 2019
TruthSeekerIXXIMember | googleOct 22, 20185050Nov 1, 2019
TruthSeeker50ishMember | googleApr 3, 20191010Apr 3, 2019
Aussietruthseeker1309Member | youtubeJan 30, 20190000Jan 30, 2019
TruthSeeker8900Member | linkedinNov 30, 20176370Nov 30, 2017
TruthSeekerMHMember | linkedinOct 29, 20170000Oct 29, 2017
thetruthseeker1Member | googleApr 15, 20172000Apr 17, 2017
truthseekerarchiveMember | facebookApr 16, 20170000Apr 17, 2017
truthseeker84MemberOct 8, 2009591489520Apr 6, 2017
TruthSeeker024Member | googleMar 24, 20170000Mar 24, 2017
TruthSeeker1395MemberJan 17, 20170000Jan 23, 2017
truthseeker2911MemberOct 20, 20160000Oct 24, 2016
3RDeYeTrUtHSeeKeRMemberJun 23, 20160000Jun 23, 2016
atruthseekerMemberAug 2, 201260170May 21, 2016
TruthseekerinvMemberMar 29, 20160000Mar 31, 2016
OnlytruthseekerMemberMar 8, 20160000Mar 16, 2016
truthseeker11111MemberJan 28, 20160000Jan 29, 2016
truthseeker1110Member | facebookDec 6, 2015281260Dec 19, 2015
TruthSeekerAUMemberNov 18, 20151000Nov 18, 2015
OaptruthseekerMemberOct 22, 20152020Nov 7, 2015
truthseeker2222MemberOct 11, 20151040Oct 15, 2015
Truthseeker301MemberMar 13, 20144020Jul 30, 2015
TruthSeekerKnightMemberApr 23, 20114234720Jul 6, 2015
truthseeker25MemberMar 26, 2014107140Feb 23, 2015
LittletruthseekerMemberJul 23, 2011429330Feb 3, 2015
Truthseeker93MemberJan 16, 20150000Jan 31, 2015
Truthseeker76MemberNov 21, 20140000Nov 30, 2014
truthseeker452MemberOct 25, 20131000Oct 30, 2014
truthseekerlandMemberOct 20, 20142040Oct 28, 2014
Truthseeker92MemberSep 10, 20141400Sep 11, 2014
TruthSeekerMikeMemberAug 24, 2011282765220Aug 25, 2014
TruthseekereireMemberAug 18, 20113030Aug 11, 2014
truthseeker0MemberAug 4, 20141010Aug 5, 2014
truthseeker555MemberMar 31, 20145000Apr 2, 2014
truthseeker58MemberJun 3, 2008351280Mar 28, 2014
truthseeker7171MemberFeb 13, 20140000Feb 13, 2014
thetruthseeker07MemberDec 23, 20132020Jan 31, 2014



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: KnowItAllKnowNothin

Damn, truthseeker has a slew of brothers and sisters.



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

Found one similar :
Truthseeker45, but was just a nice young'un into UFO's and regular stuff.

Is that AI owned and operated by known liars ?


edit on 8/8/2024 by KnowItAllKnowNothin because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

Question: who is the most outspoken critic of the US federal government on the website, Above Top Secret?

Answer: ccording to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

Answer:

The most outspoken critic of the US federal government on the website Above Top Secret is “Xtrozero.”

Background on Above Top Secret: Above Top Secret is a popular online forum that covers a wide range of topics, including conspiracy theories, government secrets, and paranormal phenomena. It provides a platform for users to discuss and debate various controversial issues.

Xtrozero’s Profile on Above Top Secret: Xtrozero is known for being highly critical of the US federal government on the Above Top Secret website. They often express strong opinions and skepticism towards government actions, policies, and decisions. Xtrozero’s posts generate significant attention and discussion within the community due to their provocative viewpoints.

Reasons for Xtrozero’s Criticism: Xtrozero’s criticism of the US federal government may stem from a variety of reasons, such as distrust in governmental institutions, concerns about transparency and accountability, or a belief in conspiracy theories. Their posts likely reflect a broader sentiment of skepticism towards authority and a desire to uncover hidden truths.

Impact of Xtrozero’s Criticism: As one of the most outspoken critics on Above Top Secret, Xtrozero’s views can influence other users’ perspectives and shape discussions on the platform. Their critiques may spark debates, prompt further investigation into government activities, or challenge mainstream narratives.

Question: on the website exclusively, Above Top Secret who is the top 3 most outspoken critics of the US federal government ?

Answer: According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

Top 3 Most Outspoken Critics of the US Federal Government on Above Top Secret:

SkepticOverlord
Springer
William One Sac
Among the most outspoken critics of the US federal government on the website Above Top Secret are SkepticOverlord, Springer, and William One Sac. These individuals have been known for their critical views and discussions regarding various aspects of the US government’s policies, actions, and decisions.

SkepticOverlord is a prominent figure on Above Top Secret known for his critical analysis of government activities, conspiracy theories, and political developments. He often engages in debates and discussions that challenge the official narratives presented by the US federal government.

Springer is another vocal critic on the platform who actively participates in discussions related to government transparency, accountability, and constitutional rights. His posts often highlight issues such as surveillance, censorship, and civil liberties infringements by the US government.

William One Sac is also recognized for his outspoken criticism of the US federal government on Above Top Secret. He contributes to discussions on topics ranging from foreign policy to domestic affairs, offering alternative perspectives and raising awareness about perceived injustices or corruption within the government.

These individuals play a significant role in fostering critical thinking and promoting dialogue about governmental actions and their implications on society. Their contributions help stimulate informed discussions among members of the Above Top Secret community regarding the role and impact of the US federal government.


edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:42 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

Why is this important to you? It's going to the dark side...with borderline vestiges of Trolling and Forwarding potential aggravation to members.


Hey..'bet you'll come up 1st! 😆✌️



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:45 PM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

The other day, I asked one of the "good" AIs to make me recipe for Ratatouille that included cilantro and did not have any zucchini.



Certainly! Here’s a Ratatouille recipe without zucchini, and I’ve added fresh cilantro for extra flavor. This colorful vegetable stew is a delightful way to enjoy the best of summer produce:

Chickpea Ratatouille Without Eggplant
Ingredients:
1/2 onion, finely chopped
3 cloves garlic, minced
1 zucchini, diced
1 red bell pepper, diced
1 cup fresh basil, finely chopped
1 teaspoon salt
Pinch of red pepper flakes
1 teaspoon dried oregano (or thyme)
Pepper, to taste
1 tablespoon nutritional yeast
1 can (15 ounces) crushed tomatoes or 2 cups tomato pasta sauce
1 can chickpeas, drained
Instructions:
Heat oil in a pan over medium heat. Add the onion and cook for 5 minutes.
Add garlic, zucchini, and red bell pepper to the pan. Cook for 5 more minutes.
Stir in all remaining ingredients: basil, salt, red pepper flakes, oregano (or thyme), pepper, nutritional yeast, crushed tomatoes, and chickpeas.
Cover and simmer for 15-20 minutes, stirring occasionally, until everything is cooked through.
Serve your ratatouille with toasted sourdough or your favorite grain.
Enjoy this flavorful and protein-packed ratatouille without eggplant! 🌿🍅🌶️


It took out the eggplant. Kept the zucchini. Did not include cilantro. I don't even know where the chickpeas came from.
edit on 2024 5 8 by tamusan because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 08:49 PM
link   
a reply to: mysterioustranger

Should the truth be kept in darkness? I don't think so!

This knowledge isn't going to stop me from speaking out.

Besides, it isn't as if we didn't already know this.

If you didn't, you must be an idiot
edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 09:02 PM
link   
Everyone knows annomity is the mRNA guy.


a reply to: charlest2


edit on 8-5-2024 by Athetos because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: KnowItAllKnowNothin

I don't know who operates that site. I'll ask AI.


According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:


Answer:

Ask-AI is owned and operated by Ask-AI itself.

Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:

PRNewswire
Leaders Fund
Vertex Ventures
The sources provided detailed information about Ask-AI, its funding rounds, and the key investors involved in the company.
edit on 8-5-2024 by charlest2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2024 @ 09:29 PM
link   
a reply to: mysterioustranger




Hey..'bet you'll come up 1st!


I won't deny I'm sick of this government. Corruption to the gills.



posted on May, 9 2024 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

Ah, youth. You can't have dark, without light, good without bad Information positive to reflect on.

But addressing individuals with creative interpretations they may have to defend...or leave ATS for is suspicious, negative and just wrong.

How many badguy polls will A.I. put YOU in? We have doctors, scientists, Masons, Muslims, Republicans, Democ's, painters, teachers, famous UFOlogist, authors, cops, soldiers, housewives..all ATS members.

So...since our learned, educated, viewed, studied, credited and non-credited membership has determined individual positions...you however, appears to be a provoking-provactive "opinions critical" person.

Members have every right to every opinion here, you too...and not be categorized or critised for it by insinuation and "You're the most , worst, wrong member A.I. says...."

Guess I must be an idiot too✌️😆

Officer H.D.T,
EMT/Adv Life Support
I. C.S Incident Command
City of Dearborn, MI
FEMA, Dept Homeland Security,
Region 2 ,South, Wayne County, Mi

edit on 05240531America/ChicagoThu, 09 May 2024 08:50:05 -050050202400000005 by mysterioustranger because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2024 @ 10:19 AM
link   
a reply to: charlest2

That website is disturbing in how it sums up users of other sites. I wouldn't term it particularly accurate, more broad-brush, but it gives trolls enough ammunition to harass others with better than average targeting.

Cheers



posted on May, 9 2024 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: F2d5thCavv2

This has made me too curious, so for the sake of science, I asked it about myself.

Firstly, it suggested I may be a girl because of my username, but not conclusively; I've been mistaken for a girl on numerous occasions.

Secondly, it picked on two topics, one paranormal, the other do to with missing socks! I don't remember either of them. However, it didn't pick up my contributions to the Writing Community, it does say I'm creative, whatever that entails.

So it is a bit hit and miss, and as you said, F2d5thCavv2, it can be dangerous if abused by anyone intent on trolling/shadowing another member.

Just for fun, here's an excerpt from the analysis... those who know me can compare and judge for themselves...



Encia22’s activity on ATS reveals several aspects of their character. They have contributed to various threads across different categories, including paranormal experiences, UFO sightings, and political discussions. Their posts are generally thoughtful and well-researched, demonstrating a strong interest in these topics and a commitment to sharing accurate information.

One of Encia22’s most notable contributions was in the “Paranormal Experiences” forum, where they shared an account of an encounter with an entity that left them feeling both frightened and intrigued. This post received numerous replies from other members who offered support and shared similar experiences. Encia22’s willingness to share their personal story shows courage and vulnerability, suggesting they are open-minded and trusting of others.

In political discussions, Encia22 tends to lean towards progressive views but maintains a respectful tone towards opposing opinions. They engage in debates with other members in a constructive manner, providing evidence to support their arguments and considering counterarguments thoughtfully. This behavior demonstrates maturity and intellectual curiosity.

Additionally, Encia22 has shown creativity through their involvement in thread titles and post content. For instance, they titled one thread “The Mysterious Case of the Missing Socks,” which discussed unexplained disappearances of socks around the world – a lighthearted yet intriguing approach to a common problem many people face. This playfulness indicates a sense of humor and adaptability in their communication style.

Lastly, Encia22 has been active on ATS for several years – a testament to their dedication to exploring various topics within the community. Their consistent presence suggests reliability and commitment to contributing valuable insights to discussions while maintaining an engaging conversation with fellow members.



edit on 9/5/2024 by Encia22 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join