It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Dark Pyramid of Alaska | Military Cover-up of a Forbidden Collaboration
In a remote corner of Alaska, a military officer stumbles upon a chilling discovery—an enormous pyramid buried deep under the icy wilderness, possibly larger than the Great Pyramid of Giza. The initial sighting during a seismic event leads to whispers of ancient technologies and hidden histories.
The local news coverage mysteriously vanishes overnight. Witnesses and insiders offer conflicting stories, fueling speculations about secret military involvement and otherworldly energies.
It's become known as the Dark Pyramid or Black Pyramid. What are the origins of this enigmatic structure? Why is it buried? Why so much security and secrecy? Could this be buried technology that holds truths about our past and power beyond our understanding?
originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: 727Sky
I find the most unbelievable part to be the finding of the object as a result of earthquake readings from a Chinese atomic blast. While it is possible to do a siesmic survey and map it in such detail, the trucks of equipment would have to be sitting almost on top of it. An anomaly that small would not show up on equipment designed for earthquake readings. The equipment is just not sensitive enough or dispursed in a manner to pick it up.
The rest, I don't know.
I find the most unbelievable part to be the finding of the object as a result of earthquake readings from a Chinese atomic blast.
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3
I find the most unbelievable part to be the finding of the object as a result of earthquake readings from a Chinese atomic blast.
That is my big problem as well. I have a lot of experience in acoustics imaging and I know that this would be an impossible detection unless planned in advance with a great deal of equipment and being very close to the anomaly. Even then, the ability to detect evan a large 3-dimensional object and resolve it adequately would be extremely difficult.
Acoustically, from one sound event and from that distance we can not do this today and if we could, we would be uncovering vast amount of buried structures on a regular basis. Even the ability of ground penetrating radar (really a sonar) can not resolve better than telling massive ground disturbance and empty voids.
If there is any truth to this story, than the detection part is made up and that threatens the validity of the whole scenario.
JJ even said that he has trouble with whistle blowers and their real agenda. That in itself leaves lots of uncertainty because it is just hearsay if not completely verified.
originally posted by: Nickn4
I have little doubt that the National Reconnaissance Office has a facility in Alaska. The Agency Nextdoor to the NRO is the CIA.
If the story were true, Alan would disappear for outing it and the fish would be fish sticks.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: SchrodingersRat
They ever do work up around Fairbanks?
Ask because one time a year or so ago I was at an aurora viewing area, that requires driving past a NOAA site that has some oddly heavy duty gates. While looking for the lights the sky suddenly got bleached out, due south of us (NOAA site) was lit up with giant search lights (guessing), so I eventually gave up and drove home.
I slowed down going past the gate, and for the first time it was manned by guys in dark ish uniforms (it was 3 am) carrying MP5 I think, and it just so happened a dark SUV that appeared to have dark tinted windows entering the gate.
I still wonder about that, and who was in control of that site.
originally posted by: anthelion
Pal, if you were into any of the good stuff, you would never tell anyone you worked in Chantilly. a reply to: SchrodingersRat
originally posted by: Scratchpost
originally posted by: charlyv
a reply to: BeyondKnowledge3
I find the most unbelievable part to be the finding of the object as a result of earthquake readings from a Chinese atomic blast.
That is my big problem as well. I have a lot of experience in acoustics imaging and I know that this would be an impossible detection unless planned in advance with a great deal of equipment and being very close to the anomaly. Even then, the ability to detect evan a large 3-dimensional object and resolve it adequately would be extremely difficult.
Acoustically, from one sound event and from that distance we can not do this today and if we could, we would be uncovering vast amount of buried structures on a regular basis. Even the ability of ground penetrating radar (really a sonar) can not resolve better than telling massive ground disturbance and empty voids.
If there is any truth to this story, than the detection part is made up and that threatens the validity of the whole scenario.
JJ even said that he has trouble with whistle blowers and their real agenda. That in itself leaves lots of uncertainty because it is just hearsay if not completely verified.
Good point. but..
US had a lot of radars pointing at the north pole.
the radars could see a nuc go off.
and this would have a shadow on it.
but they (US army!) would NOT tell some news people?