It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is perhaps too early to digest fully the various economic, political and even geostrategic implications of this stunning development, widely considered a major blow to the Bush administration's economic sanctions on Iran and particularly on Iran's energy sector, notwithstanding the Iran-Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA) penalizing foreign companies daring to invest more than $20 million in Iran's oil and gas industry.
�
For a United States increasingly pointing at China as the next biggest challenge to its Pax Americana, the Iran-China energy cooperation cannot but be interpreted as an ominous sign of emerging new trends in an area considered vital to US national interests.
�
China, Russia and Iran share deep misgivings about the perception of the United States as a "benevolent hegemon" and tend to see a "rogue superpower" instead.
�
A glance at Chinese security narratives, and it becomes patently obvious that Beijing shares Iran's deep worries about US unipolarism culminating in, as in Afghanistan and Iraq, unilateral militarism. Various advocates of US preeminence, such as William Kristol, openly write that the US should "work for the fall of the Communist Party oligarchy in China".
�
But, realistically speaking, what are the prospects for any regional and or continental realignment leading to the erasure of US unipolarism, notwithstanding the US military and economic colossus bent on preventing, on a doctrinal level, the emergence of any challenger to its global domination now or in the future? The strategic debates in all three countries, Russia, China and Iran, feature similar concerns and question marks.
�a pertinent question is who will win over Russia, Washington, which pursues a coupling role with Moscow vis-a-vis Beijing, or Beijing, trying to wrest away Moscow from Washington? For now, Russia does not particularly feel compelled to choose between stark options, yet the situation may be altered in China's direction in case the present drift of US power incursions are heightened in the future. The answer to the above question should be delegated to the future. For now, however, the quantum leap of China into the Middle East and Caspian energy markets has become a fait accompli, no matter how disturbed its biggest trade partner, the US, over its geopolitical ramifications. read more�
Originally posted by sturod84
this is crazy! we provide the chinese massive trade dividends and then they take our money and buy stuff from our sworn enemy. china you filfthy whore
Originally posted by sturod84
this is crazy! we provide the chinese massive trade dividends and then they take our money and buy stuff from our sworn enemy. china you filfthy whore
this is crazy! we provide the chinese massive trade dividends and then they take our money and buy stuff from our sworn enemy. china you filfthy whore
The only thing that is keeping the CCP in power these days is that they are driving a nationwide economic boom, the likes of which ordinary Chinese have never seen before. Ironically China now has a growing affluent (by Chinese standards) middle class thanks to, of all things, the Chinese Communist Party. If the money dries up, China will have a revolution on her hands once again, just as she has many times throughout her 6000 year history. The power-drunk, money-drunk CCP knows this all too well, they being the very instigators of the last Chinese revolution. They will stop at nothing to protect their economic success. The reason they haven't invaded Taiwan is not because they fear the US military might, it's because they fear the economic consequences of a drawn-out battle with a US-supported Taiwan.
If China ever attains democracy, it will be a long time from now, and unfortunately it will most likely only happen via revolution, a failed war effort, or internal economic collapse. As long as the CCP is doing well, they will not give up the reins and institute a multi-party system. Why should they? They hold all the power and money, and China is developing nicely as it is. Although they profess otherwise through propoganda and such, the leaders of the CCP couldn't give a rats derriere what the people think. As long as there are no major events, the political status quo will continue for a very long time in China. Regardless, within the timeframe of events in the Middle-East and a possible conflict between China and the US over Iran oil, this is a moot point.
foundations to become a democracy,the only question is the time.i myself quite optimistic of this.
but one mistake u made(IMO) is that u see the CCP as a whole,actually the CCP is made up of tens of millions of people(My God),the majority of which are ordinary workers,peasants,teachers and students.so corrupted senior officers doesn't represent the CCP.
This is completely off-topic. If you wish to post your opinion on the issue of Taiwan's national sovereignty, you can go to these relevant threads:
As for taiwan,it is a part of china