First New Madrid Earthquake Possible? June 13th, 2014?

The first New Madrid earthquake could have been scheduled. Don't be fooled either that if it does happen, that after the fact, they claim it took place in the "Wabash Valley Zone", in order to try to cause confusion. The Wabash Valley Zone is simply one part of the New Madrid Zone, and don't believe any nonsense from anyone that tells you otherwise.

It may very well be that Wabash Valley in the northern section of New Madrid, let's say in Southern Illinois for example, or that Indianola, Mississippi, in the Southern section of New Madrid's zone could be the target area. The scientists will also claim that Indianola isn't actually a part of New Madrid either, which of course is another lie. Don't be fooled by their lies, remember you were told about this here before hand if it happens. It is a part of New Madrid's zone. So don't fall for it if they try to claim differently, which they probably will, if that's the target area of the attack, which it could be.

These could be target zones for an attack, because they are weak zones of the fault area.

Of course, the quake might happen in the main fault zone area, and might happen right at ground zero of the original famous start of the 1811-1812 quake sequence, with the December 1811 series of quakes that happened in Arkansas. Where depending on the historical accounts, 2 or 3 cataclysmic quakes happened in one night at the same location. They might try to duplicate that, so they might target Arkansas to repeat that same effect. The prospect of 2, or by some historical accounts, even 3 mega quakes in one day would be hard to resist.

Or, they might target right at New Madrid, Missouri, where the largest earthquake in written history is known to have occurred in February of 1812, trying to duplicate that. Of course, thinking about the prospects of the repeat of such a quake would be hard to resist.

But Indianola is also a very good target because it's a weak spot in the fault zone, and it would cause a particularly large amount of flooding into the fault, which would be catastrophic in terms of what a quake might do. Also, a very large quake in the Southern Illinois section of the New Madrid Zone has the added prospect of taking out more people in Saint Louis, as it could do more damage to the power plant and river there.

Then there is also how they might plan it to where specifically they might want to take out each individual nuke power plant in the region.

The point is, that anywhere in the general area could be the intended main target for the epicenter of a possible first quake. The New Madrid Zone acts differently than other fault zones, as the number of other large quakes generated after the initial quake is unprecedented. For example, in 1811-1812, there were 4-5 mega quakes (depending on the historical accounts) and a total of 7-8 giant quakes (again, depending on the historical accounts). This is something that makes this fault totally unique from all others in the world. Once it goes, it becomes a hellish nightmare for many months on end, with mega quake, after mega quake, after mega quake. Making New Madrid unique among all of the world's fault zones.

So wherever the epicenter of the first quake is, if it goes off, the entire zone will eventually be hit with a mega quake, or will be close enough to one to be heavily damaged by it. So, if you live within 200 miles of the fault zone, always be prepared.

The first New Madrid earthquake might be set for the date of June 13th, 2014.

This can however be delayed, by it being known ahead of time that the first quake was being possibly set for that day. If enough people are aware that the quake is perhaps being scheduled for that day, then it will have to be delayed to a later date.

By talking about this possibility and discussing this, it will force the earthquake, if it is planned, to be delayed to a later date. So that it will NOT happen on the intended date. So therefore, it won't take place on the scheduled date, as long as we discuss this and talk about it on this site and other sites, like YouTube, etc. That way, the quake will NOT happen on the intended date. But, if we do not discuss this, then of course there would be no reason to call off the plans, if there are any, and the quake would probably in all likelihood go ahead as scheduled.

Or perhaps instead, plan B, if there is one, would be put into place then.


So please, spread this information around.

edit on 21-2-2014 by Red Cloak because: (no reason given)

Who are "they"?

What is the reasons for the "targets"?

DHS tests?

Unless scientists are trying to avoid a large devastating quake by inducing smaller ones that could delay larger quakes?

Meh, I don't care who "they" are. This thread is just BS doom porning without links. Well, depending on the doom porn, it can be equally BS even with links depending on source. Either way, Predictions or Hoax Bin is a more appropraite home for it rather than Fragile Earth.

Hello there,
I live in the zone. I couldn't find a source listed for your info so could you please provide a source?

reply to post by Red Cloak


Care to back this claim up with links and tell us "who" they are.

mblahnikluver
reply to post by Red Cloak

 

Care to back this claim up with links and tell us "who" they are.

If I may be so bold as to answer for the OP...

NO...

Thread belongs in Skunk Works or the Grey Area...

. So therefore it won't take place on the scheduled date, as long as we discuss this and talk about it on this site and other sites, like YouTube, etc. That way, the quake will NOT happen on the intended date. But, if we do not discuss this, then of course there will be no reason to call off the plans, and the quake will go ahead as scheduled.

Theoretically, it could still happen on that same date, because they (tptb, aliens, enemies) that set up the earthquake event, could just say it was a lucky guess

So who are "they", and how do you know about the event and the date?

snowspirit

. So therefore it won't take place on the scheduled date, as long as we discuss this and talk about it on this site and other sites, like YouTube, etc. That way, the quake will NOT happen on the intended date. But, if we do not discuss this, then of course there will be no reason to call off the plans, and the quake will go ahead as scheduled.

Theoretically, it could still happen on that same date, because they (tptb, aliens, enemies) that set up the earthquake event, could just say it was a lucky guess

So who are "they", and how do you know about the event and the date?

The important thing is getting the information out.

Friday 13th June,

Interesting day for an earthquake.

Bally

I hope we don't have to wait until June 13 for the mods to put this incoherent rambling in the trash(hoax bin).I'm out

I this another one of your HAARP is firing a gazillion gigawatts at the New Madrid fault again with no more links than last time? Sorry, have to call BS unless you can provide some (any?) supporting evidence.

Until then I want to warn everyone about the dual parallel tsunami's that will strike the east and west US coastlines on May 30, 2014. Not going to provide any links though just "get the word out."


Edit again - Did this just move from Fragile Earth to the Predictions forum? I take everything back then, except the tsunami's.

Red Cloak


The important thing is getting the information out.

edit on 21-2-2014 by Red Cloak because: (no reason given)

That's half of it. The other half is backing the information you put out with credible evidence, or at least some kind of info. What good is the info if people question the source of it? No one will believe it, so almost no one will know about it, and "their" plan will come to fruition, according to your model. The best thing you can do is put out your reasons for believing this, and let people decide for themselves. If it's believable, then maybe the info will spread. If it isn't believable, then it will die a quick death, but it will also die a quick death if all we have to go on is "trust me, this is about to happen..."

Doom porn that has a date ... that's the best kind. Awesome.
If we all survive the Viking Apocalypse that is scheduled for tomorrow,
we can keep an eye out for this big earthquake you predicted.

Gotta' love doom porn.

reply to post by FlyersFan


This is no such thing as doom porn. This is trying to prevent a plan that might possibly be in motion. Doom porn is giving a date and hoping it happens. This is giving a date, and trying to block something from possibly happening. Please get your facts straight.

Gozer

Red Cloak


The important thing is getting the information out.

edit on 21-2-2014 by Red Cloak because: (no reason given)

That's half of it. The other half is backing the information you put out with credible evidence, or at least some kind of info. What good is the info if people question the source of it? No one will believe it, so almost no one will know about it, and "their" plan will come to fruition, according to your model. The best thing you can do is put out your reasons for believing this, and let people decide for themselves. If it's believable, then maybe the info will spread. If it isn't believable, then it will die a quick death, but it will also die a quick death if all we have to go on is "trust me, this is about to happen..."

The info is out there. Now it needs to be spread.

Red Cloak
Please get your facts straight.

It's doom porn. My facts are fine. And don't get so uptight.
I complimented the fact that you put a date on the prediction. That doesn't happen very often.

/OUT

FlyersFan

Red Cloak
Please get your facts straight.

It's doom porn. My facts are fine. And don't get so uptight.
I complimented the fact that you put a date on the prediction. That doesn't happen very often.

/OUT

How was this a prediction?

Red Cloak


The info is out there. Now it needs to be spread.

What makes your info any more credible than Bassago's just as credible "info" about a double-prarallel tsunami on May 14th? Putting information out is one thing, having others believe AND spread it because it seems credible, is another. It seems you only want to go halfway.

Gozer

Red Cloak


The info is out there. Now it needs to be spread.

What makes your info any more credible than Bassago's just as credible "info" about a double-prarallel tsunami on May 14th? Putting information out is one thing, having others believe AND spread it because it seems credible, is another. It seems you only want to go halfway.

I'm just saying what is in the post. This could possibly happen on that date, or not happen if it is talked about. By talking about it, it will probably not happen. Nothing more than that. If you think I am crazy, or lying, that is fine.

reply to post by Red Cloak


We just want to know the source of your info. We're all wondering how credible your source is.

And who "they" are