It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Government ESP research
During the Cold War, rumors circulated that the Russians were developing an army of psychic spies; in response, the U.S. military created a program to examine whether psychics could be useful in military applications. The program, called Stargate, tested "remote viewers" to see if their feelings and visions were accurate. The research continued for about two decades, ending in the mid-1990s with little apparent success. Finally the CIA took over the program and asked scientists to review the results. They concluded that the psychics did no better than chance, and that the psychic information was neither validated nor useful. Project Stargate failed and was shut down.
Phage
reply to post by abeverage
That is an unfortunate name for a scientist, isn't it?
abeverage
reply to post by KrzYma
KrzYma I would have liked an overview of the video and your opinions. But that is just me. I just happened to watch this video and enjoyed it actually I would have given you some applause if you worked a bit for it...
KrzYma
According to some experiments done since the 60ties, Telepathy, Psychokinesis, Clairvoyance... all this is possible.
Maybe somebody write an manual how to train this abilities
This video was recently posted (January 26 2014) in the science and technology forum so this seems like a duplicate topic:
KrzYma
According to some experiments done since the 60ties, Telepathy, Psychokinesis, Clairvoyance... all this is possible.
Maybe somebody write an manual how to train this abilities
I.. somehow, always known
It's not really 32%, it's the difference between 32% measured, and 25% random chance, which is only 7%, and while Radin claims the 7% difference is statistically impossible if there is no real effect, that claim would only be true if the experiments were relatively free of bias. When you look at the experimental design, mainstream science doesn't see 7% as impossible to achieve with bias as Radin does.
LittleByLittle
reply to post by Arbitrageur
First let people get used to the 32% synchronous manipulation of reality,
Arbitrageur
It's not really 32%, it's the difference between 32% measured, and 25% random chance, which is only 7%, and while Radin claims the 7% difference is statistically impossible if there is no real effect, that claim would only be true if the experiments were relatively free of bias. When you look at the experimental design, mainstream science doesn't see 7% as impossible to achieve with bias as Radin does.
LittleByLittle
reply to post by Arbitrageur
First let people get used to the 32% synchronous manipulation of reality,edit on 12-2-2014 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
online pos that came tru while protecting the person's identity
sadsad
How could someone before world events took place again and again and again