Curiosity Takes Picture of Pharaoh-Like Statue!

reply to post by lemmin

Good work,

I wanted to believe for a while, it was a awkward place for a statue anyways, martians surely had better feng shui knowledge.

lemmin
I hate to say it, but I think I may have found the debunking evidence for this.

Here are the full images:

mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...


I'm surprised at how small the resemblance is between the pharaoh-head rocks in each photograph. Maybe I'm mistaken, but the relativity to the other objects doesn't seem to leave any other possibility.

how do you figure that your black and white pic is of the same are as the pharaoh's head?

reply to post by Cydonia2012


Its a diffrent angle of the same rocks very small rocks i might add. See thats why there numbered follow the numbers.

You know if rocks looked just like they often do in photos you could revolutionize the Pet Rock industry. I think these threads are neat but if there was anything on Mars that could jeopardize anyone's investments they would be scrubbed before anyone ever saw them.

I also wonder if artifacts could be added to have people chasing their own tails. BTW, hands down most convincing thread yet.



"SQUIRREL!!"

reply to post by lemmin


Can you please find and post the HD color versions of sol 535?


To me it look like the pictures you posted were manipulated....but that's just me.

cavedweller88
reply to post by lemmin

 

Can you please find and post the HD color versions of sol 535?


To me it look like the pictures you posted were manipulated....but that's just me.

There black and white photos because there taken with the nav cams. It has 2 cameras near the ground to guide the rover. Thats why the rocks dont look as big either. Whenever they need to check the position of the rover the nav cams are used thats why we have a second shot of the rocks in the first place. When the rover moved into that position it takes pictures of the surroundings.

cavedweller88
reply to post by lemmin

 

To me it look like the pictures you posted were manipulated....but that's just me.

Could you explain better what kind of manipulation you think it was made?

I don't know about pictures and stuff but i picked the "statue" and the rock behind in both pictures and the ratio is 2.6 in both



Maybe what i did does not make sense but it if you see rock by rock you will find a equivalent in both pictures.

I've got a good word for the song, to substitute for the first part of "Born in Arizona, raised in Babylonia" how about "Born in Cydonia...".

Richard Hoagland would approve (so many more finds since his Mars Face) en.wikipedia.org...(region_of_Mars)

Not sure what to make of this, alien structure or what?
Be glad to hear some thoughts.

The URL to NASA pic is:
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...

FYI: At the top of the pic count 4 lines over from the left and click and zoom in there, you will see it!

reply to post by tc842senior


Which one do you mean the rock or the rock thats to the left of the other rock?

reply to post by tc842senior


Whilst certainly very interesting, it still isn't proof of anything,

Mars exploration is going to get very exciting I think. And as far as all these images go, there's a lot of very interesting things there to us novices, but I'd like to hear some views from a fully-trained archaeologist. They may say that it's all nothing, I'd still like to hear their views.

reply to post by dragonridr


The one thats in the middle that looks like a box with holes in it.

reply to post by tc842senior


Most likely a rock, but kind of looks like this:

Tune into ATS LIve to hear this terrific thread discussion.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Cheers Zazz

Airing Monday, February 24th, 10pm EST.