It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thorneblood
Do you realize that your nonsensical rants do more to insult your intelligence then anyone else in this thread possibly could?
Go back to school, learn some etiquette and try again later.
boncho
ChaoticOrder
reply to post by OpinionatedB
I also can not say if the PDF is even based on his report because I can not find a full copy on the internet.
Boncho already posted a link the full document and claimed it was legit. If there's anyone I trust on this forum to state the facts as they are it's boncho.edit on 1/2/2014 by ChaoticOrder because: (no reason given)
Much to my own chagrin, I have to admit that I have made mistakes in the past. In any case, I can clarify on why I believe it is indeed real:
Bushnell has done similar thought experiments for the navy.
If you look at the world future society, Busnell often gives persentations at future planning conferences.
And to solidify the veracity of it, here is exactly when and where it was presented (possibly incorporated into other forums and conferences as well):
Dartmouth
EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES:
Recommendations for Counter-Terrorism
INSTITUTE FOR
SECURITY
TECHNOLOGY
STUDIES
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE
34.) PowerPoint Presentations
Advances in Biotechnology: Promise and Peril.................................................353
George Poste
Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare...............................................................360
Dennis Bushnell
And for the people who remain confused on the purpose, it was presented at strategic planning forums, where plenty of issues were raised, all in how to defend against threats. It's not a map of what to do, nor does it mean any of it will happen. Since the presentation is "2025", it's basically just a bunch of "what if" scenarios for people in charge of state defence.edit on 1-2-2014 by boncho because: (no reason given)edit on 1-2-2014 by boncho because: (no reason given)