It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On December 14, Janitch conducted two ten-minute tests with his Geiger counter and found radioactivity levels between 74.2 and 81.4 counts per minute.
BlackJackal
On a normal day Michael Janitch measures around 30 counts of radiation per minute in his backyard. However, recently when it snows that number is tripled. Could this be an indication that fallout from Fukishima is making its way to the USA via precipitation?
On December 14, Janitch conducted two ten-minute tests with his Geiger counter and found radioactivity levels between 74.2 and 81.4 counts per minute.
blogs.riverfronttimes.com...
BlackJackal
On a normal day Michael Janitch measures around 30 counts of radiation per minute in his backyard. However, recently when it snows that number is tripled. Could this be an indication that fallout from Fukishima is making its way to the USA via precipitation?
ErosA433
Not much to worry about, the reality is that background radiation varies by about a factor of 100 around the world, with a few hot spots caused by exposed shield rock, and local coal burning plants. (No typo, coal and fossil fuel burning processes pump out a nice amount of radiation in the form of dust)
Furthermore, the rain being apparently contaminated is most likely dust. Uranium and Thorium in dust particles put out various radiation signatures and have a few long and short lived daughters. Polonium and lead daughters are known to stick to surfaces. So when it rains, the water washes this off of surfaces and it collects.
Seriously a factor of 2 is totally in the noise. You can quadruple your normal daily dose depending on if you eat bananas or not.
For all the denying of ignorance people pertain around here, its time it actually happened and people educated themselves a little bit rather than listening to a couple of sound bites and then self proclaiming expert level knowledge
ErosA433
Not much to worry about, the reality is that background radiation varies by about a factor of 100 around the world, with a few hot spots caused by exposed shield rock, and local coal burning plants. (No typo, coal and fossil fuel burning processes pump out a nice amount of radiation in the form of dust)
Furthermore, the rain being apparently contaminated is most likely dust. Uranium and Thorium in dust particles put out various radiation signatures and have a few long and short lived daughters. Polonium and lead daughters are known to stick to surfaces. So when it rains, the water washes this off of surfaces and it collects.
Seriously a factor of 2 is totally in the noise. You can quadruple your normal daily dose depending on if you eat bananas or not.
For all the denying of ignorance people pertain around here, its time it actually happened and people educated themselves a little bit rather than listening to a couple of sound bites and then self proclaiming expert level knowledge
PlanetXisHERE
So we don't have to worry about Fukushima fallout?
PlanetXisHERE
So we don't have to worry about Fukushima fallout?
Health effects[edit]
Main article: Radiation poisoning
A dose of under 100 rad will typically produce no immediate symptoms other than blood changes. 100 to 200 rad delivered in less than a day will cause acute radiation syndrome, (ARS) but is usuallynot fatal.
Doses of 200 to 1,000 rad delivered in a few hours will cause serious illness with poor outlook at the upper end of the range.
Doses of more than 1,000 rad are almost invariably fatal.[2] The same dose given over a longer period of time is less likely to cause ARS. Dose thresholds are about 50% higher for dose rates of 20 rad/h, and even higher for lower dose rates.[3]
Radiation increases the risk of cancer and other stochastic effects at any dose. The International Commission on Radiological Protection maintains a model of these risks as a function of absorbed dose and other factors. That model calculates an effective radiation dose, measured units of rem, which is more representative of the stochastic risk than the absorbed dose in rad. In most power plant scenarios, where the radiation environment is dominated by gamma or x rays applied uniformly to the whole body, 1 rad of absorbed dose gives 1 rem of effective dose.[4] In other situations, the effective dose in rem might be thirty times higher or thousands of time lower than the absorbed dose in rad.
source
Also remember that the 7/10 rule still applies. For every 7 fold hours, the RADS per hour can be divided by 10.
FlySolo
I've never thought about radioactive snow before but now that I have I can see a whole set of other problems. Snow dumping sites are going to be highly radioactive and what's going to happen in the spring? Looks like cites are going to need a few million more in their snow removal budget to include hazmat now.