It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
IbcBen
These kind of weapons are truly scary. Not that we don't already have things worse in our inventory, but the natural progression of weapons tech is and portability for deployment just makes my skin crawl.
TrueBrit
reply to post by canucks555
It will be more impressive if they ever figure out how to make the lazer kill incoming targets after less than a second of exposure to the beam. If you ask me, this current version of the HEL takes way to long to kill its targets.
TrueBrit
I would be after a lazer system which delivered all of the power of a sustained burst in less than a tenth of a second, in one fat pulse. I would be after creating a device which would be capable of turning a target to vapour
TrueBrit
reply to post by GEORGETHEGREEK
I very much doubt that any current lazer weaponry in existence has the capabilities that I can either imagine, or would require if I was to be the fellow whose job it is to create effective technology to remove missiles from the air, and further lazer capability in general. For one thing, I would be after a lazer system which delivered all of the power of a sustained burst in less than a tenth of a second, in one fat pulse. I would be after creating a device which would be capable of turning a target to vapour so fast that it had no time to produce a classical explosion of any kind before being whisked away on the damned breeze, and could be shoulder mounted, rather than relying on several tonnes of machinery to produce the effect or transport the platform.
Anything less than that would be a failure as far as I am concerned.
TrueBrit
reply to post by GEORGETHEGREEK
I very much doubt that any current lazer weaponry in existence has the capabilities that I can either imagine
The Navy's death ray weapon keeps burning through laser records, on its way to the ultimate goal of searing through 2,000 feet of steel per second.
Imagine a FEL powered by a huge nuclear powered carrier ... yeah.
ENrgLee
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Imagine a FEL powered by a huge nuclear powered carrier ... yeah.
I would like to see the behemoth of a klystron required to make the Ev levels nessecary to take advantage of a nuclear reactors power output....
And STEERING a near reletavistic beam of electrons would be a challange as well.
Not to mention, doing it in non-vacuum.