It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by dominicus
Are there any areas of study that teach you how to handle complex situations, probabilities, skilset
crowdedskies
reply to post by dominicus
The natural answer would be Quantum Physics. As you know banks have been recruiting graduates with Phd in Physics in the last 25 years . If you know about Derivatives then you would realise how there are so many variables that only a physicist would be able to come up with a formula that achieved the objective. It will not be long before physics is applied to situations that you mentioned.
As for myself , I have other ways of dealing with situations that have a multiplicity of variables.
edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)
dominicus
crowdedskies
reply to post by dominicus
The natural answer would be Quantum Physics. As you know banks have been recruiting graduates with Phd in Physics in the last 25 years . If you know about Derivatives then you would realise how there are so many variables that only a physicist would be able to come up with a formula that achieved the objective. It will not be long before physics is applied to situations that you mentioned.
As for myself , I have other ways of dealing with situations that have a multiplicity of variables.
edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)
Can u share the ways you deal with "situations that have a multiplicity of variables"?
WhiteAlice
reply to post by crowdedskies
Bayesian inference
When it comes to human nature, however, it doesn't need to be rocket science. In fact, it doesn't even need crazy looking equations. The reason why you'll find rocket scientists in financial fields is because they are capable of thinking in terms of a multitude of variables and packaging it in a nice and neat dashboard for CEOs and CFOs because they prefer numbers. Like I said though, one doesn't need to do crazy looking equations to ascertain a probable outcome. Using an Ishikawa diagram and a comprehension of normative behavior, one can actually identify some of the variables that may affect the outcome (predicted behavior) without the use of numeric equations. It just takes identifying those related and influencing variables and oftentimes, there are key ones (instinctual/survival based) that typically (normally) have a greater weight in decision making above all others.
crowdedskies
dominicus
crowdedskies
reply to post by dominicus
The natural answer would be Quantum Physics. As you know banks have been recruiting graduates with Phd in Physics in the last 25 years . If you know about Derivatives then you would realise how there are so many variables that only a physicist would be able to come up with a formula that achieved the objective. It will not be long before physics is applied to situations that you mentioned.
As for myself , I have other ways of dealing with situations that have a multiplicity of variables.
edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)
Can u share the ways you deal with "situations that have a multiplicity of variables"?
I would be curious to know first of all what you think about Physics as a means of resolving those multi-variable situations involving people or things.
WhiteAlice
reply to post by crowdedskies
That was my implication as to why a specific type of individual was used in a specific field that requires quantifiable results/outcomes/projections that can satisfy shareholders for a specific rationale in decision making. Most people don't need to have it down to a numeric value at a preset confidence level; therefore, it doesn't need to be overly complicated with long formulas.
The OP is looking for a way for the average person to be able to do something similar. The average person is going to simply run screaming after one look at something like Bayesian inference. Doesn't take a rocket scientist to make that prediction either but an awareness of what constitutes the average human being.
nugget1
reply to post by dominicus
Since you authored this thread back in February:
The Ultimate Enlightenment "How To" Thread: www.abovetopsecret.com...
I am confused as to the point of this one.
It would seem you already believe you have all the answers, and are jerking our chain?
dominicus
crowdedskies
dominicus
crowdedskies
reply to post by dominicus
The natural answer would be Quantum Physics. As you know banks have been recruiting graduates with Phd in Physics in the last 25 years . If you know about Derivatives then you would realise how there are so many variables that only a physicist would be able to come up with a formula that achieved the objective. It will not be long before physics is applied to situations that you mentioned.
As for myself , I have other ways of dealing with situations that have a multiplicity of variables.
edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)edit on 18-12-2013 by crowdedskies because: (no reason given)
Can u share the ways you deal with "situations that have a multiplicity of variables"?
I would be curious to know first of all what you think about Physics as a means of resolving those multi-variable situations involving people or things.
Our knowledge of physics is ever evolving. Its a combo of structure and chaos, and yet existence somehow manages, doesn't it.
So to apply the rules of physics to life itself and our relationships to all of it...could be brilliant, but I just can't currently fathom how you would do it.