Which JFK Assassination Conspiracy Theory Do You Prefer?

E. Howard Hunt implicated LBJ but this article doesn't mention the aliens.

www.rollingstone.com...

This page goes into great detail, including the aliens. He should have left the aliens alone and he might have been left alone.

www.ufoconspiracy.com...

nothing on the main board about this date , people forget so easily

a reply to: stonerwilliam

Sorry I was not here in time to post on the 55th anniversary of the assassination but made it in time for the funeral anniversary.

Hey, I don't remember where I read this, but in case it was here, for what it's worth, there are plenty of photos of the limousine out there showing bone and brain fragments and blood.

This says investigators spent a month examining the limo.

www.autoblog.com...

Guess that story about the Secret Service shooing everyone with a camera away while they did a quick cleanup was totally false.

Also, regarding the flowers. Mrs. Kennedy was handed red roses when she landed at Love Field in Dallas, but the Zapruder film shows yellow roses. A number of pictures of the limo seem to exist from different angles and those showing flowers also seem to show yellow roses. In later life Mrs. Kennedy did not like flowers and preferred other decorations such as fruit baskets.

Having heard about this, and all of it the following can be stated:

The first rule of assassination is that there can be no witnesses. Any witnesses that survive can ultimately cause problems and have to be eliminated.

Governments have used the underworld, criminals, when it is needing something dirty done, without having any ties back to them, that way they can have the protection of plausible deniability.

So I believe that both Oswald and Ruby were used, hired to do a job, Oswald to be a patsy, Oswald to be a killer. And those responsible disappeared, or have died.

I also suspect that the director of the FBI, J. Edgar Hoover, either knew or suspected who was responsible and ultimately remained quiet, but watched.

originally posted by: CoriSCapnSkip
a reply to: stonerwilliam

Sorry I was not here in time to post on the 55th anniversary of the assassination but made it in time for the funeral anniversary.

I was very very disappointed to come to a conspiracy site on this date and see nothing up about this on the date in history that it happened

People have been split in two with all the political debate going on they have forgotten that it is US V THEM 1% and not left v right and the 1 %

If the case was so open and shut why hush up an assistant embalmer? Geez.

herald-review.com...

Found this one one day, not my favorite but definitely a different one. mileswmathis.com...

As Joe Pesci said in the film JFK "It's a riddle inside an enigma wrapped up in a mystery "..we'll never know.

J.F.K had pissed off a lot of people and opened up a whole can of whoop-ass on himself and his brother.

THE MAFIA, Kennedy won the election with mafia help. Joseph Kennedy promised things in turn for votes that JFK wouldn't do. Plus Bobby went all Rambo against them and started a one-man crusade against the families. That mixed with the fact Kennedy wasn't in favour of invading Cuba, which was costing the Cosa-Nostra 1.5 million a week in lost revenues from drugs, girls and casinos.

THE CUBANS for the Bay of Pigs.

THE RIGHT WINGERS for his supposed love of communism because of the above.

THE CIA - He sacked Dulles and made it plain the CIA was living on borrowed time, when in fact he was.

THE ARMY - He sacked General Charles Cabell for the bay of pigs, with "If this was England I'd have to go, but it's not so YOU'RE going"..his brother was, surprise surprise, EARLE CABELL, mayor of Dallas when Kennedy had his accident.

THE MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX - that Eisenhower had warned us all about, one of Kennedy's last presidential orders was to bring the first 1500 boys home from Vietnam and be out by '65. The first thing Lydon did was reverse that order. JFK wasn't going to war, the complex WASN'T going to lose money.

THE BANKS- he told the federal reserve that the USA wasn't going to lend any more money. He even signed a presidential order that has NEVER BEEN RESCINDED. However, the government keeps lending to pay for its wars. The banks never lose.

TEXAN OIL OWNERS - he cut their subsidies. LBJ's friends lost all their government hand-out's.

When you do things like that to people of that sort of power and money, do you really expect to die in bed aged 95?

When you do things like this to people like that, do you expect to die in bed aged 95?

a reply to: andy1972

Nope, you certainly don't.

The National Geographic documentary is highly recommended!

www.nytimes.com...

I fell upon this thread after generally lurking here on ATS as I have for years and was sucked in... wholly. I don't have the status to PM or u2u anyone here, yet I did want to send out a general and appreciative "thank you" to the major contributors of dialogue on this thread... namely to "wtbengineer"... and especially to "CornShucker" (whom I know was ailing in health when he last posted a couple of years ago). Having fallen upon this thread mostly a few years after the fact has left me kinda... behind.

Questions (and not to thread drift, but I do have to ask since I don't have the above mentioned ability to PM anyone yet...).

1. Does anyone know of CornShucker's whereabouts? How he may be doing? Such a sharp and interesting mind. Loved his posts...

2. Regarding AB and his film.

As stated in this thread among the myriad of posts, there's the "original" 16mm "Super 8" film which was split and copied (... three copies, that is...) prior to "Life" taking it's copy for the weekend, prior to the CIA and FBI taking theirs, prior to the NPIC doing their work over the assassination weekend... which begins to enter the "conspiracy" side of alternate assassination theories as such, there's an assertion, or at least some presumption that can be made that the film we now know to be the "Zapruder Film" in the national archives is both different in length, and arguably in content (adulterated) - this being different from the original or original generation photocopy (before removal from the Dallas area).

Question: Has Zapruder ever made comment to or ever referenced the possible difference in length and content of his "original", this in comparison to what's held now in the national archives?

(I'm a newbie at this... but have read this thread in entirety (SO GOOD!) - and was just wondering if this question has been considered by anyone here previously or upon another related thread?

I have always believed that JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy involving the Military-Industrial Complex they were deeply invested in Vietnam and intended to stay there until at least the 80's. But,things didn't work out that way and once Reagan was installed they went to Central America and the rest is history.

a reply to: Blue Shift

Two people indicated Johnson at the very least knew
what was going to happen and didn't stop it. Or as Jack Ruby
Said was the main conspirator among a host of others. Johnson was
a thug and his mistress was the other.

And Kennedy made way to many enemies for anyone to believe
Oswald acted alone. The warren report is by far the least believable
account of what happened.

a reply to: mike dangerously


THE JFK military connection is disclosed in audio tape 65.2 at the Kennedy Library.

Kennedy presented the Medal of Science to Dr. Theodore Von Karman, 18 February 1963.
Von Karman died June 6 of the same year.

JFK was our first made for TV president (Enter Sandman).

They can't handle the truth..

a reply to: Blue Shift

I've always just wanted to know why they killed him instead of just replacing him or having him impeached or whatever

a reply to: sapien82

Truman-Eisenhower-Kennedy
Seven Days in May
General Eisenhower preceded Kennedy as president which makes the book theory seem a little strange.
Unless you are a time traveling alien or listened to audio tape 65.2

a reply to: CrazyFox



So the Kennedy's used stunt Doubles ? lol
No I'm just kidding. I was up til day break going over a lot of the massive
read you linked. And I must say it's creator does have a sharp eye. And I
myself have even been sharp enough to raise the same questions in regards
to the stills. Hell I knew the carcano newspaper photo of Oswald was faked
when I was just ten yrs old. So that took no convincing for me. And that
as I got a older, led me to discovery of a few more that didn't add up.
Like the one shot of Qswald Ruby from twelve feet high. So it was pretty
cool to get verification and go the direction he goes with everything.

I think he maybe he should've just followed the example David Paulides
was smart to use and just present the evidence which he has a ton. But
without reaching a conclusion that, let's face it seems impossible. I think
if the conclusion seems ridiculous then most won't even look at the
evidence.

For me anyone who looks at the Miles evidence at least can't walk away
thinking Oswald acted alone. There's just no God damn way in hell that
happened.

GOOD POST

originally posted by: sapien82
a reply to: Blue Shift

I've always just wanted to know why they killed him instead of just replacing him or having him impeached or whatever

Your question shouldn't stump you it is a good question and the way
asked it the only answer is revenge because they killed both John
and Robert. They even waited for the heat of the first killing to die
down and then got the other one. Motive for investigation? Revenge
of course.

Or maybe they had a choice. Get sent under ground or die but that's
the thing for me conclusions are easily discarded. The evidence not
at all. And yet even the fake death isn't impossible at all. Not for the
rich and certainly not when gov. is involved. One final tid bit I'm gonna
toss in the ring just for kicks. 1965 CBS shows america anything is possible
with the show Mission Impossible. Now you go figure.