It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Source
"The definition of Word in Hebrew is from the root ‘Speak.’ Speaker is more accurate for John 1, although the Greek Logos is the word used to note the storyteller. In the ancient Hebrew pictographs, we find the symbol for water and the Shepherd's Staff (middle of Truth – MEM). The way to arrive at the full meaning is to follow the root forward to the words that branch from the root itself.
My lexicon says this: the definition and meaning of the pictograph for 'Word' is “A continuation of segments, which fills the whole.” From this definition, we can easily make the connection that physics makes to the geometry of the universe as a fractal and the mistaken view that light is a duality uncreated. As I said, meaning derives from following the root. From the root of ‘Word,’ we see the expanded words below.
The next definition is a “Chain blended together to form a sentence.” This is obviously how words form, but we also know that amino acids and photons also form with these same root patterns. This is interesting terminology used by both physics and the Hebrew language to denote chains of information. The Hebrew language uses 'parent and child' to denote these chains...Related to this branch of the morphology of 'Word', we find the word 'sickness' or a break in the chain.
The next link in this chain is the word 'Matter.’ Matter is the chain of particles with rest mass binding energy with information and form. The meaning here should be obvious to most readers as the substance made up of atoms. What we may not realize is the information rendering this form from letters and words of intelligent programming.
EnochWasRight
The next definition is a “Chain blended together to form a sentence.” This is obviously how words form,
How does this path expand to English? Simple. The letters used to express Western words are the very same words used by the Father (Aleph Bet) to write all words.
alfa1
EnochWasRight
The next definition is a “Chain blended together to form a sentence.” This is obviously how words form,
How does this path expand to English? Simple. The letters used to express Western words are the very same words used by the Father (Aleph Bet) to write all words.
Except for the unfortunate fact that none of any of what you have written is actually true.
You just cant go around "chaining" the modern english spelling of words together and expect to find something useful.
The word "heart" is a perfect example of why this is complete rubbish.
Do yourself a favour and read up on Grimms Law.
You will see that the "H" part of "Heart" is a changed form of the "C" in the original latin word "cordis" that still survives today in many European languages such as the French "cœur", or the Italian "cuore".
All of this "adding an extra letter" stuff you did is meaningless drivel.
EnochWasRight
Most English words originate in Hebrew ...
Pinkorchid
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Hello Enoch,
I believe words are an incarnation , a vibration if you will . This vibration sends the intent of an individual into the matrix of energy to seek out similar vibrations that will eventually form the matter related to the word.
alfa1
EnochWasRight
Most English words originate in Hebrew ...
Ah. I see now.
It wasn't clear from your original posting, but I see you're one of Mozeson's crazies.
I'm not taking part in this thread anymore. I've got better things to do with my life.
alfa1
EnochWasRight
The next definition is a “Chain blended together to form a sentence.” This is obviously how words form,
How does this path expand to English? Simple. The letters used to express Western words are the very same words used by the Father (Aleph Bet) to write all words.
Except for the unfortunate fact that none of any of what you have written is actually true.
You just cant go around "chaining" the modern english spelling of words together and expect to find something useful.
The word "heart" is a perfect example of why this is complete rubbish.
Do yourself a favour and read up on Grimms Law.
You will see that the "H" part of "Heart" is a changed form of the "C" in the original latin word "cordis" that still survives today in many European languages such as the French "cœur", or the Italian "cuore".
All of this "adding an extra letter" stuff you did is meaningless drivel.
Why? What happened to the Germanic languages that didn't happen to the rest of Indo-European ones? Maybe we should blame, or thank, the Phoenicians. The idea is that when speakers of a Semitic language (with lots of those sibilant f, th and h sounds) learned PIE from native speakers, they spoke it like all adult foreign language learners: with an accent. In this case, with their own "hissy" accent, which their children then learned -- and etcetera. So unlike the rest of the PIE daughter languages, which were uniformly transmitted "native-speaking-parent to child," Proto-Germanic appears to have undergone at least one "parent-speaking-a-foreign-language to child" transmittal.
Phoenicians are the mostly likely "second-language-transmittal" candidates, because they were the best navigators, traders and explorers at the time when Proto-Germanic originated (between 2,000 and 3,000 years ago). We know Phoenicians gave us our alphabet (Field Notes, 11/19/2009). Now it seems fitting, if the theory's right, that they're also responsible for most of our consonants.
Pinkorchid
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Hi Enoch , this is for you :-