Top 5 Conspiracy Theories That Are True!

InTheFlesh1980
Why do conspiracy theorists get mocked when the government has ALREADY [...]

Because the CIA trying to get media coverage to be favorable to it is not the same as claiming that scientists skilled in pneumatic chemistry are using the Air Loom to emit magnetic rays in order to control people's minds.

These actual conspiracies are all of a few people who have a dumb idea, and don't get very far with it. The first one you mentioned, Operation Northwoods, didn't even happen. It was an outline of an plan someone proposed which was rejected because it was a dumb idea.

This doesn't compare to the elaborate conspiracies that require the cooperation of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people. Not to mention that usually requires large communities of experts, such as scientists or engineers, to somehow be completely unaware of things that would have to contradict basic parts of their fields. (E.g., Apollo hoax claims, and 9/11 "controlled demolition" theories require millions of scientists and engineers to somehow have completely missed supposedly obvious signs.)

That's why people make fun of you. Because it's absurd and ridiculous.

Moduli

InTheFlesh1980
Why do conspiracy theorists get mocked when the government has ALREADY [...]

Because the CIA trying to get media coverage to be favorable to it is not the same as claiming that scientists skilled in pneumatic chemistry are using the Air Loom to emit magnetic rays in order to control people's minds.

These actual conspiracies are all of a few people who have a dumb idea, and don't get very far with it. The first one you mentioned, Operation Northwoods, didn't even happen. It was an outline of an plan someone proposed which was rejected because it was a dumb idea.

This doesn't compare to the elaborate conspiracies that require the cooperation of thousands, hundreds of thousands, or even millions of people. Not to mention that usually requires large communities of experts, such as scientists or engineers, to somehow be completely unaware of things that would have to contradict basic parts of their fields. (E.g., Apollo hoax claims, and 9/11 "controlled demolition" theories require millions of scientists and engineers to somehow have completely missed supposedly obvious signs.)

That's why people make fun of you. Because it's absurd and ridiculous.

You mention 911 and in relation to that are the 100s of structural engineers that have came forward rejecting the official explanation of the collapse of these buildings to be regarded as absurd and ridiculous, were do you draw the line in credibility , were do you personally come in the ladder of credibility to justify not including or mentioning those in better professional positions to yourself as these engineers who reject the official fairy story of why these buildings free falled?? You do recognise that professionally trained black op military intelligence"s could very well have operated a completely stealth like operation on these buildings resulting in successful controlled explosions to bring them down?? There is nothing absurd and ridiculous about these very plausible realities...