It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BobAthome
reply to post by IandEye
rumour has it,, its a spiritual MARK.
and who has seen the wind?
bekod
reply to post by IandEye
then there is no true religion left it is all lies to fit mans way not god for if all the works are of man to fit man then there is no god left to guide us , 666, is the mark and not some tattoo is it an id or pin or card or it is all the above... and what does sex have to do with it?
littled16
I think you need to keep searching if you are truly interested in finding the truth...
IandEye
does empowerment come from an external image- an idol?
although Christianity says its ok, no other religion really does.....except Satanism- the one that says Satan is the "balancing energy of the Universe".
the mark of the beast are tattoos. and you yourself chose to get it, no one made you.
tell me one person who doesn't think their tats make them "cool". that "coolness" isn't religious (from the latin re-ligare: "to rejoin, to yoke"; yoga is Sanskrit meaning "to yoke"). No- it is in fact a SEPARATION from unity, being..... whatever you want to call "it".
I look forward to the gnashing of teeth that will be your replies. the more vociferous you are, the more I am assured in my belief that the mark of the beast is a simple ink tattoo, and that the empowerment one feels from their ink isn't necessarily a good thing.
flame away!
post-script: Im talking here about the "civilized" world and anyone who is a part of it, not Samoans, Apaches, or people for who tattoos mean something other than what Disney character you wanted to be. ouch.....edit on 11-10-2013 by IandEye because: (no reason given)
the rise of AI? self aware computer to mark all, them that are not should die, for they are a virus to the system. wow some links are of less than intelligible here is the rewrite "And he had power to give life unto the Image of the beast, that the Image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the Image of the beast, should be killed" lack of proofreading or to much time texting ??
And he had power to giue life vnto the Image of the beast, that the Image of the beast should both speake, and cause that as many as would not worship the Image of the beast, should be killed.
IandEye
but rather the theory that white Christians with cushy jobs and tattoos are full of bs and work for evil without even knowing it, ot even worse, knowing it.
Blarneystoner
If you're going to make that claim I think you should show how not having a tattoo prevents someone from buying or selling.
The Bible says that the mark would be forced upon people, so far no one has forced me to get a tattoo.
Also, the bible clearly states that the mark of the beast would be on the forehead or the right hand.
Tattoos were already around when revelations was written, if the mark was a tattoo, why doesn't it just say "tattoo" instead of "mark"?
Leviticus 19:28 (Amplified) which says, “Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print or tattoo any marks upon you: I am the Lord.”
Nope... I don't think you hit the mark... so to speak.edit on 11-10-2013 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)
post-script: Im talking here about the "civilized" world and anyone who is a part of it, not Samoans, Apaches, or people for who tattoos mean something other than what Disney character you wanted to be. ouch.....
OrphanApology
reply to post by IandEye
I have a large mole on my left buttocks. Does that count as well? Is it only tattoos?
Rosinitiate
OrphanApology
reply to post by IandEye
I have a large mole on my left buttocks. Does that count as well? Is it only tattoos?
Can I see?