posted on Oct, 8 2013 @ 08:58 AM
What is more incorrect? Believing everything is a conspiracy or believing conspiracies never happen?
First of all it depends how you define conspiracy, but lets just go with the usual colloquial use of the word to imply some kind of cover-up or
secret truth.
With that said then obviously believing everything is a conspiracy is much more incorrect, sure there are some real "conspiracies" like the Gulf of
Tolkin, Iran Contra, PRISM and so on but they are the exception not the rule. To believe everything is a conspiracy means you are basically saying
that reality is not really reality and everything has a secret truth behind it. Eventually you lose all grasp of reality and start thinking that your
postman is a NSA spy reading your mail and nukes brought down WTC, KFC make black dudes infertile and thats not a plane it is a UFO.
Conspiracies, real conspiracies, are very rare, sure they exist and are very interesting but to run to the conspiracy as a default is just stupid.
its like whenever there is a terrorist attack and on the first page of replies before we have any real information someone always says "false flag".
So yeah its way more incorrect to assume everything is a conspiracy.
The correct thing to do is to question everything, have a open mind and accept the sum of the truth .
edit on 8-10-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin
because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-10-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)