It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
hknudzkknexnt
This is amazing, I believe in my lifetime there will be Martian colonies. Some day we will have two worlds.
I bet there are vast pockets of water underground as welledit on 26-9-2013 by hknudzkknexnt because: (no reason given)
why do they not put a robot on the moon i have always wondered that with the amount of probes we send to mars it would be a lot easier and a good bit cheaper to do this by nasa or get elon musk involved
spartacus699
reply to post by gortex
I bet the truth is more like this. That rover is actually in area 51. The operates might not all know that. One realized there was that water build up. The leaked the story. But the water was either rainfall or condensation building up since the rover is here.
There's an Xprize to get a rover on the moon. Now think about that, we can get a rover to mars but there's no need to send one to the moon? Does that make sense to you? The you-es didn't send one to the moon for fear that it would expose there fake lunar landing.
Now if this whole rover to the moon xprize gets cancelled for some unknown reason don't say I didn't warn you. After such a massive lie, to send anything to the moon now would be very risky. Because they would quickly find out that there's not a trace of any landing area.
0bserver1
reply to post by winofiend
yeah some members here pointed out on photo's taken by Nasa that they saw water.. But they have to sniff and sneeze before they really know what their seeing . I would say one picture says 1000 words?
but hey... whoam I, just a packet on the net!
Ok. Dish. Why do you think life is currently on Mars?
Prof Benner explained: "It’s only when molybdenum becomes highly oxidised that it is able to influence how early life formed.
"This form of molybdenum couldn’t have been available on Earth at the time life first began, because three billion years ago, the surface of the Earth had very little oxygen, but Mars did. "It’s yet another piece of evidence which makes it more likely life came to Earth on a Martian meteorite, rather than starting on this planet."
Early Mars is also thought to have had a drier environment, and this is also crucial to its favourable location for life's origins. "What’s quite clear is that boron, as an element, is quite scarce in Earth’s crust," Prof Benner told BBC News, “but Mars has been drier than Earth and more oxidising, so if Earth is not suitable for the chemistry, Mars might be. "The evidence seems to be building that we are actually all Martians; that life started on Mars and came to Earth on a rock," he commented
NoRulesAllowed
When abundant amounts of water and O2 (!!!) get released from the soil with high heat...
Means a massive meteorite impact would create WATER and O2 when I read this right...
This is VERY interesting.....would a massive meteorite impact transform Mars into a new Earth?edit on 42013RuThursdayAmerica/Chicago16PMThursdayThursday by NoRulesAllowed because: (no reason given)
spartacus699
reply to post by gortex
There's an Xprize to get a rover on the moon. Now think about that, we can get a rover to mars but there's no need to send one to the moon? Does that make sense to you? The you-es didn't send one to the moon for fear that it would expose there fake lunar landing.
Now if this whole rover to the moon xprize gets cancelled for some unknown reason don't say I didn't warn you. After such a massive lie, to send anything to the moon now would be very risky. Because they would quickly find out that there's not a trace of any landing area.
gortex
reply to post by AboveBoard
... but I believe that our red neighbor holds many surprises for us (...)