Massive Sea Monster Spotted on Deep Sea Oil-Rig Cam (Video), page 1

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 11:22 AM

link

(Unsure how to categorize, feel free to move)

The liveleak video is slightly different. Uploaded yesterday Sept 17.
www.liveleak.com...

News article on it (plenty more floating around now)
deepseanews.com... l-jellyfish/

Ok, truth is, it's been determined to be a Deepstaria enigmatica deep sea jelly fish, according to the article above and various sources. Regardless, it's the most disturbing looking creature I've seen which is proven to exist. This ain't your usual jelly fish.

727Sky

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 11:26 AM

link

reply to post by BeyondPerception

It has been posted several times.... sorry... It is a type of known jelly fish if I remember correctly but for the life of me I do not remember the name...

tridentblue

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 11:30 AM

link

reply to post by BeyondPerception

Right as I was watching that, this came on my playlist, and provided the soundtrack:

Seems somehow appropriate.

edit on 19-9-2013 by tridentblue because: (no reason given)

BeyondPerception

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 01:34 PM

link

727Sky
reply to post by BeyondPerception

It has been posted several times.... sorry... It is a type of known jelly fish if I remember correctly but for the life of me I do not remember the name...

If you'd actually read my post of a whopping .. paragraph .. you'd notice I actually mentioned the name.

Variable

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 01:49 PM

link

reply to post by BeyondPerception

It's been posted several times this video. I don't think we need to constantly post the same things over and over as if they are new.

V

GuidedKill

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 01:55 PM

link

reply to post by Variable

In all fairness not all people have been a fan or members of conspiracy websites as long as others. To some new members of the community this is something they have never seen before. With that said this video has been done to death on ATS and even new members should at least attempt a search before posting. Not saying the search function always work but I think the OP would have had no problem finding this one.

Now in response to the OP. I have always been fascinated by the hexagon shapes in the flesh of the animal on that video.

PhoenixOD

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 02:53 PM

link

reply to post by BeyondPerception

Never heard a jelly fish called a monster before

This has been posted many times over the last few years.

edit on 19-9-2013 by PhoenixOD because: (no reason given)

LionOfGOD

posted on Sep, 19 2013 @ 03:02 PM

link

Ok, truth is, it's been determined to be a Deepstaria enigmatica deep sea jelly fish, according to the article above and various sources. Regardless, it's the most disturbing looking creature I've seen which is proven to exist. This ain't your usual jelly fish.

You can rest assured in the fact that there way more disturbing looking
creatures that you´ve never heard of down there.
Usual? Define "usual".

ETA: I don´t swim in the oceans.
Do i really need to explain why?
edit on 19-9-2013 by LionOfGOD because: (no reason given)

AbleEndangered

posted on Sep, 20 2013 @ 01:49 AM
link

Ive seen this before, I know what happens next....

*spoiler alert*
That thing turns into the face of a Lady, yeppers!
edit on 20-9-2013 by AbleEndangered because: added - *spoiler alert* for added humor

Pinkorchid

posted on Sep, 23 2013 @ 06:15 PM
link

reply to post by BeyondPerception

In defence of the new people here on ATS , this thing is quite indescribable , so how are they to search or even know to search for it?

Yes the OP could have done a search , but if he didn't know exactly what sort of search to do , he would not have found it.

What skin of your nose is it to see a repeat of another post , really?
If you have seen it move on.
I'm quite sure the Mods can monitor repeat threads.

Mountains out of mole hills , is my opinion.
P.S Thanks OP , I hadn't seen it and I would never in my imagination even thought to look for it.
edit on 23-9-2013 by Pinkorchid because: (no reason given)