NASA Forgot To Edit?

Well Another Pixel problem
UFO: Right UP corner from your side.
spaceflight.nasa.gov...


Wait, NASA Forgot To Edit The Picture?

Check out this picture at the same point :
spaceflight.nasa.gov...

Ahah no object? Nah there is one. I used photoscape to make it visible properly and now you can see


Invitation for JimOberg and other people to give some views on the pixel error please

reply to post by HiddenSecrets


If you are referring to the object on the upper right it appears to be a double exposure or a reflection..it matches the top of the space station exactly...

reply to post by HiddenSecrets

I would love to know what you're talking about

Yup, what Chrismarco said, most probably window reflection since there's couple of layers of glass I presume...

reply to post by zilebeliveunknown


my apologies...the upper right..if you are referring to that smaller object it is the same section as the space station...you can see the panel extend on both images....does that help...maybe you are seeing something else that I am missing..I am seeing two images...one of the left presumably the space station and the almost ghost like one on the right which has the same shape as the one on the left which includes a portion of the panel...

Hmmm, All I see is the reflection of pic, Can you point out anything else.....or is this what you are talking about

well after looking harder at your pic you provided, I only see the 3 dots of reflection on that pic, its original reflection point is from the docking section of the ISS. Nothing really else to see, sorry

Just a reflection guys. I copied and adjusted the two section for you. I only applied brightness contrast and level changes.




clickable: files.abovetopsecret.com...


EDIT oops in my hurry to get the right pic in i linked up the wrong box lines LOL, you get the idea.

reply to post by Biigs


JimOberg take the day off...we got this one..

reply to post by HiddenSecrets


Although this picture has been debunked, it does bring up an interesting point with respect to picture artifacts...how does this happen with today's camera's. Consider this when viewing other images that may just be camera/photo lens issues..

reply to post by chrismarco

Found the thread, posted yesterday.
Consensus: reflection of the top part of ISS
Linky

chrismarco
reply to post by HiddenSecrets

 

If you are referring to the object on the upper right it appears to be a double exposure or a reflection..it matches the top of the space station exactly...

edit on 10-9-2013 by chrismarco because: (no reason given)

Your right it does well spotted..

zedy63

chrismarco
reply to post by HiddenSecrets

 

If you are referring to the object on the upper right it appears to be a double exposure or a reflection..it matches the top of the space station exactly...

edit on 10-9-2013 by chrismarco because: (no reason given)

Your right it does well spotted..

Or it *could* be the *other* space station.

Why build one, when you can have two for merely twice the price?

HiddenSecrets

spaceflight.nasa.gov...


spaceflight.nasa.gov...

If you actually looked at both pictures YOU would have seen the position of the station is NOT the same in both, open both pictures on separate browser tab's and switch between both views.

So reflections flares etc will not be exactly the same.

reply to post by HiddenSecrets


Already covered on ATS yesterday or day before... I forget the name of the thread. Additionally, debunked as an artifact, look at the top of the ISS and the artifact, it's a reflection.

Seems like their clutching at straws in here,again..


Bottom of the barrell thread!!!

chrismarco
reply to post by Biigs

 

JimOberg take the day off...we got this one..

edit on 10-9-2013 by chrismarco because: (no reason given)

I'm buying.

That's a Progress cargo drone on the Russian Service Module -- but
there isn't one there now, so it's at least several weeks old, the photo.

ADD: A dozen years old.

Yeah, STS-110, taken out the shuttle overhead window. So
it could be a Progress or a Soyuz, they look a lot alike.

Topic already being discussed, as pointed above.

Thread closed.