It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

My name is Tom Carey, and I have spent the past 22 years researching the Roswell incident. Ask me an

page: 12
289
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:53 PM
link   
reply to post by TomCarey
 
I also read from another source said he also had contacts with people who where there at the real alien autopsy that when the alien was open it oozed a thick green liquid.So who do we believe? to many conflicting stories



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 10:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Watchfull
 


Yes. There is theory going around now that the Aztec, NM crash was really a cover story for the Roswell crash. The Aztec crash was first written about in 1950 in a book by Variety features columnist Frank Skully titled, Behind the Flying Saucers. It was a best-seller, but it was debunked a few years later by a journalist from the San Francisco Chronicle by the name of J.P. Cahn, who contended that the story was a fiction created by two oil con-men in order to sell something they called a "Doodlebug." The story was resurrected in the early 1970s by a Florida "Professor" Robert Spencer Carr, only to be debunked again by a fellow named Mike McClellan. The story was researched again by Scott Ramsey who published a book about two years ago titled The Aztec Incident. Like I said, there are stirrings afoot that the story really had to do with the Roswell crash and was changed by the two con men for reasons unknown to me at present.



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 11:14 PM
link   
Hello Tom,

Thank you for an opportunity to ask a question about Roswell to someone with excellent credentials, and certainly a person who has invested a great part of their life researching this remarkable incident.

My question is simple. Have you ever seen a piece of material from this crashed vehicle, and/or, have you met anyone that claims to have a piece of it? Certainly, I would not ask you to name anyone if so, but I am intrigued with the idea that there must be someone, somewhere, that is not officially involved in this matter, that does have a piece of this material. Over all of the years, and with so many people involved, and such a large wreckage area, something must have turned up and was saved by someone. It is my opinion, but I believe there must be some of this material in public hands, and I would certainly not blame them for keeping it very close to the vest.

Thanks!

CharlyV



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 11:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by Springer



LET'S STOP THE QUESTIONS FOR

TODAY/TONIGHT




It's after 11:00PM East Coast time and Tom will be back tomorrow (U.S. Time), let's give him a fair shot at answering the remaining questions first. (If you're paying attention you'll notice he's taking them in chronological order).

Thanks.

Springer...


Just sayin'



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 11:39 PM
link   
So what about the others across the pond? Do they need to wake up at the dead of night to ask questions?



posted on Sep, 3 2013 @ 11:40 PM
link   
In reply to Mr Carey here is a part of the statements of someone who was at the alien autopsy.#1 Pictures showed beginning stages of autopsy, following standard procedure, body was slit from crouch to just under chin and green viscous liquid was in evidence.#2 Indications that there was no stomach or digestive tract per se. Later analysis showed that fluid within the body was chloropyhyl based liquid which apparently dealt with photosynthesis or similar process. The report theorized that nourishment was taken in through mouth, however since there was no digestive tract or anything of this nature, the waste products were excreted through skin.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 12:02 AM
link   
reply to post by TomCarey
 


Hello from Brazil Mr. Carey and welcome to ATS, the place the World ends everyday!

Here is my question:

Assuming it was an Alien craft, one can suppose its crew were not alone and may have informed their people of the iminent crash. In our Earthly manners a rescue would have been in place asap.

Considering this as a possible scenario, there should have been more UFO sightings in the region.
Finally the question: Were there more UFOs in the area soon after the incident? Did people saw anything that could've been related to the accident?

I'd love to hear you thoughts on this approach.

edit on 4-9-2013 by LordAdef because: Sorry Springer, I missed asking my question to Mr Pope due to the time zone. I wouldn't be able to do it later on.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 12:08 AM
link   
Tom, do you feel that the bumbling handling of this story via the Air Force with multiple cover stories is what led to their current policy of "mums the word?" After Roswell and the multiple stories concocted by the Air Force (weather balloon, bomb-detecting device, dummies), it seems as if they simply play dumb in regards to any sighting of merit.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by Tiberius2233
Hi,

I find it rather odd that an alien spacecraft crash landed in the desert after travelling through the most hostile environment known. The technology they have must be eons ahead of ours, yet they crash when they reach earth, do you not find that a little strange??

Thank you.

It ain't that odd if the ufo has warped itself to earth ( i.e Not travelled thru hostile space ) and screwed up in imparting the right altitude
and speed / direction to compensate for the rotation of the earth.
A navigational error of sorts



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:35 AM
link   
-----------------------------

Strictly speaking about the material found as described by Jesse Marcel and Mac Brazel: Small i-beams and foil-like material, no more than 3 or 4 feet in length. Would you agree that the "spacecraft" would have had to have been at least partial constructed the same as RAWIN targets of the late 40's? Even the size of the debris found is consistent with the size of balloon cargo of the time.

To me, a spacecraft traveling our galaxy or universe that just so happens to come apart/crash in the same general area where balloon cargo regularly crash, in a time period that weather balloons are used, and is constructed exactly the same(small i-beams and foil material) as weather balloon cargo on Earth, would have to be an astronomical coincidence. You would think something completely un-relatable to anything we've ever seen would have been found. If parts of a 2013 F-22 Raptor or a B-2 bomber crashed on the ranch in 1947, there would be no doubt it was something highly advanced and never seen before.

People tend to focus just on the properties of the material. Can't be bent, burned etc. Strengthened balloon cargo type of material is a reasonable assumption for cargo that's traveling beyond the typical rawin target height and for extended periods of time. But, please respond to the construction of the spacecraft to weather balloon cargo in the 40's.

Thank you.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:37 AM
link   
reply to post by TomCarey
 


Hello Tom. You stated that you find the U.S governments explanation of the Roswell incident "ridiculous" as far as the Project Mogul issue is concerned.

While I have my own doubts concerning this explanation, I find it to be the most reasonable cover story presented thus far. Could you explain for us why you find Project Mogul to be such a ridiculous explanation for the events surrounding Roswell, while keeping in mind that eyewitness testimony holds little to no merit to skeptics who can clearly see the amount of money this incident has generated for snake oil salesmen?

If I may venture a second question: What sort of real evidence is there short of eyewitness testimony that anything other worldly actually took place? I see nothing in the way of evidence other than the statement originally issued by the U.S air force, which works logically with the theory of an earthly but clandestine operation.


edit on 4-9-2013 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:48 AM
link   
My question is: because it is uncertain wether something did happen, if it did it would mean beings from another planet died on our planet. So have people tried seances to contact their homeworld to let them know what happened and how to arrange a funeral according to their beliefs. Or are there any known theories about what happened to such a spirit, did they make out of the Earth spiritual world or are they still there, or did their spirit immediately go back to where it started as all spirits do or are there theories about how the government used this spirit to gain information, hence the rapid growth.

The latter would conflict with a theory of my own, which states that computers have evolved naturally from the first looms and punchcards to WW2 artilley calculating devices or computers but if it were true it might be the aliens knew before it happened and prepared their crash. An episode of The Transformers cartoon comes to mind as I write this, where the alien robot leader decided to crash the shuttle in the past to be revived in modern times is where the story begins (more information: tfwiki.net...(G1)). This would lead me to believe these aliens are communicating with us through our imagination and became the source of inspiration for many movies which would make more sense in that light. Or it is from another source, Earth based and there was no alien crash and that story among many others which have appeared the last decennia describes universal themes, all explainable without an alien crash.

Thanks in advance for answering.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:53 AM
link   
I haven't read the questions people have asked, so if I repeat something please ignore it.

Let's talk less about the spacecraft and more about the pilots themselves

1) Were there any survivors? If so, what do you think happened to them?

2) You mentioned "strange symbols" on the craft, could you elaborate, can I see these anywhere, etc?

3. Why did the UFO crash?

4. Who were they and what were they here for? (your best guess)

5. What's your take on William Cooper, if you've watched his lectures?

Thank you



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 01:58 AM
link   
Hi Tom,
One contention with the Roswell story is the description of the debris. It is said to consist of "indestructible" foil-like metal which contradicts the objects destruction after impacting the ground. Also I-beams were allegedly found. Why would an advanced technology using ultra-strong, indestructible substances require the I-beam design which is a means of strengthening a relatively weak material. In other words why would highly advanced ETs be using terrestrial engineering methods of the 1940s?



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 02:33 AM
link   
reply to post by TomCarey
 

I personally believe the craft which crashed at Roswell was of distinctly terrestrial origin, the question that I have is, do you believe this supposition and if so from, which country do you believe it to have originated?, personally I would favour that it was a British project, brought to fruition in Canada.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 02:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ImaFungi
 


Oh the IRONY of this.....You can't trust him, because he rights books and sells them; but pharmaceutical companies can make profits off pills and vaccines, and say confirm through a circle jerk of their own people, the efficacy of these things.Ridiculous.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 02:35 AM
link   
I propose an easy solution to getting answers. If the government says that Roswell was not extraterrestrial, then someone high up in office can say, "no one has been muted about this incident. And if they feel that they have been, may they speak freely now." And it needs to be done now, since the last of any witnesses that were old enough to be reputable, will all be gone soon. I am thinking mostly about the youngsters that may have seen evidence paraded down the street etc... Or for all we know, someone may have had a "souvenir" handed down to them. Do you think you may have enough clout to get this accomplished, and fast?



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:14 AM
link   
Hi Tom - would love to interview you on the ATS Live Radio Show some time - let me know if that's possible?

My question - what leads you to believe that Roswell wasn't a failed extension of Von Brauns pet space project, launched from White Sands, given that what crashed could well have been a primitive capsule with apes on board?



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 03:47 AM
link   
Hello MR Carey, and welcome to ATS,

I have one question for you regarding Ex president Clinton, A few years ago a young boy from Belfast asked him a question regarding if Roswell ever happened, and his response was something like no it was most likely something else. Do you believe that B. Clinton knows more than what he really is saying?


Thank you for your time and continue with your travels in the quest for the truth.



posted on Sep, 4 2013 @ 04:15 AM
link   
#
edit on 4-9-2013 by EnPassant because: Already answered



new topics

top topics



 
289
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join