State Department issues $10 million reward for enemies of Islam

The State Department said Saturday's attacks bore the hallmarks of al-Qaida's Iraqi (AQI) branch. It reiterated that it was offering a $10 million reward for information leading to the killing or capture of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the AQI leader.

Is this true 10 million?

What about Benghazi?

What about Christian persecution in the middle east?

This event was horrible but wasn't it committed by people of the Islamic faith?

never mind
www.voanews.com...

reply to post by Stormdancer777


It probably is true.

However, $25 million was offer for Saddam Hussein as well as Osama BinLaden.

Neither was ever paid out.

ETA:

Don't you also think that it is a little strange that the U.S. just provided al-Qaida with weapons in Syria?

They are ALL part of the same group. It is a Very Shady Situation.

Cool.
Lets find this bastard
And the money?
Conspiracy Theory based games similar to the ones on facebook!
For example an M.I.B game that is similar to Mafia Wars.

Looks like the bounty for Ayman Al-Zawahari is at Twenty Five Million.
Most Wanted

reply to post by Thorneblood

Cool. Lets find this bastard

Lets get him! Dude, I would trade my own mother for $10,000,000!!!

Edit: -

Thats terrible, a mother's love is priceless.

But dead terrorists are worth big bucks!

reply to post by Thorneblood


I wouldn't trade my mom. I was joking.

I would ask for the money up front though I don't trust those damn Americans.

reply to post by ShadellacZumbrum

Don't you also think that it is a little strange that the U.S. just provided al-Qaida with weapons in Syria?

They are ALL part of the same group. It is a Very Shady Situation.

Yea, beyond shady, what one earth is going on?

So how do we find these cats?
Social Media?
Webcams?

Originally posted by Thorneblood
So how do we find these cats?
Social Media?
Webcams?

I don't know, our government is to busy spying on its citizens

hang on I am having a nervous breakdown, BRB

reply to post by Stormdancer777

When Saddam was in power, Al-CIAeda wasnt in Iraq.

Now Al-CIAeda is in Iraq?

The first place they should look for terrorists are at CIA and MI5 headquarters.

BRITISH UNDERCOVER OPERATIVES IN IRAQ

According to the BBC's Galpin, reporting for BBC Radio 4 (9/20/05, 18 hrs news script), Iraqi police sources in Basra told the BBC the "two British men were arrested after failing to stop at a checkpoint. There was an exchange of gunfire. The men were wearing traditional Arab clothing, and when the police eventually stopped them, they said they found explosives and weapons in their car�It's widely believed the two British servicemen were operating undercover."

"Undercover", translation, false flag attacks.

Soon after they were caught, the UK government sent a small army to free them.

So British special forces are running around in a foreign country dressed as natives, killing people and planting bombs...

Yet they'll continue to tell us that the problem is "multiculturalism". Mmm hmm, sure it is.

Screw all that.

I want that 35 million.

Cmon, this is the internet. You can find everything on here.

reply to post by gladtobehere

When Saddam was in power, Al-CIAeda wasnt in Iraq.

Now Al-CIAeda is in Iraq?

The first place they should look for terrorists are at CIA and MI5 headquarters.

Now Now.

Don't forget Mossad

They might feel we are ignoring them

We own our souls to the government store.

What if this is just for show and they know no one is going to collect, because the guy is either not real, incognito... or hiding in one of their protected basements somewhere.

Therefore this is passive...an act that really contains no action.

And the reason is because so many are accusing them (for much more plentiful reasons) of employing and guiding the hand of AQ.

It's meaningless.