It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It always surprises me how easily people can be insulted. But anyway, your list is a waste of time.
For instance, a chain of evidence must be established. If you pick out of the litter a 'free fall' as some kind of proof of building destruction with explosives, you must first explain how the building was rigged, who did it and how the explosives survived fires that burned for hours until the building collapsed.
Originally posted by whatsecret
If you can't explain all that then there is no wracked car on a side of the road?
Matter of fact it's a carbon copy. I have a pretty good idea who lead this campaign to implode the truther movement what I don't understand is why. They have never had anything other than innuendo, supposition and the twisting of facts to support ridiculous accusations. In 12 years not a single bit of evidence supports these falsities have ever emerged.
Originally posted by -PLB-
Originally posted by whatsecret
If you can't explain all that then there is no wracked car on a side of the road?
The question is not whether there is a wrecked car or not (which is analogous to ground zero of the WTC), but whether secret agents did undetectable sabotage to that car because the tail light is damaged in an odd way (which is analogous to secret agents having planted bombs in the WTC because the building collapsed in an odd way).edit on 30-8-2013 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)
-PLB-
reply to post by whatsecret
Every single piece of evidence points to the fact fire did it. From fire department reporting instability and predicting collapse to a extensive evidence supported report by NIST. Lack of evidence of bombs going off and lack of any leftovers of explosives found in the remains disproves explosives.
Your personal incredulity and ignorance is of no relevance and not at al an argument supporting your cover up theory.
-PLB-
Originally posted by whatsecret
If you can't explain all that then there is no wracked car on a side of the road?
The question is not whether there is a wrecked car or not (which is analogous to ground zero of the WTC), but whether secret agents did undetectable sabotage to that car because the tail light is damaged in an odd way (which is analogous to secret agents having planted bombs in the WTC because the building collapsed in an odd way).edit on 30-8-2013 by -PLB- because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by whatsecret
So let me get this straight.
Firefighters that said building looked unstable automatically means that building looks like it will totally collapse in seconds and they are accepted as good eyewitnesses.
Firefighters that said there were bombs going off all over the place automatically means that they were confused, had no idea what they were talking about and they are not considered as good eyewitnesses.
NIST disclosed evidence that support their theory automatically disqualifies the secret, undisclosed evidence which one person (NIST Director) determined to be irrelevant.
Did I get that right?
Can you post something that confirms that FDNY expected building 7 to suddenly, symmetrically, and completely collapse in 17 seconds? and also please post something that confirms that the evidence which remain classified are not the evidence of any kind of explosives?
Originally posted by whatsecret
Looks like you didn't get my point again... Let me try one more time just for you.
This car on the side of the road has front end damage only. The odd looking tail light appears to have two bullet entry holes, unfortunately for the investigators there is not a single bullet found anywhere on scene, just some people saying that they heard something what sounded like a gunshot. Some say it was before the accident and some say it was after. Since a gunshot-like sound could be caused by many things, it is logical to assume that they heard something else. And since there were no bullet recovered it is also logical to assume that this hole might be from something else. Are you with me so far?
The official investigation conclude that the tail light anomaly was caused by the accident. They admit that this never happened before but they found no evidence of a shooting. Also no eyewitness saw the actual shooting. And they say that as strange as it may appear there is a perfectly good explanation for it. Experts concluded that during the accident which caused severe front end damage somehow energy transferred to the marbles in the glove compartment and sent it flying . The marbles traveled through two rows of seats then changed direction and went through the driver side tail light. This was consistent with a computer model they created to figure this out. But if they release the details of that model it might jeopardize public safety.
(which is analogous to secret agents having planted bombs in the WTC because the building collapsed in an odd way).
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Varemia
Maybe I missed something...there was a spire on WTC 7?
Demolitions take out the internal structure and external structure at the same time.
Originally posted by totallackey
reply to post by Varemia
Demolitions take out the internal structure and external structure at the same time.
Hogwash and utter poppycock.