It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by ItDepends
Wow... Ease up a bit on all that hostility. We're all entitled to our opinions. In my opinion, they are making the Mt. Everest from a rather manageable mole hill and likely one built deliberately for them to find. Now, if I'm wrong, then we're ALL in a world of hurt because unless Obama just keeps his guts on cold storage somewhere, the whole war's back on with a vengeance if something DOES happen.
That's the whole thing though. The other side is hurting as bad or worse than we are for keeping up the pace. The US is effectively out of Iraq. Leaving Afghanistan within a year at most for all but a fraction of what's been there before. Why would they want, at this moment, to turn the WHOLE thing back on and more than ever? It makes no sense.
However, another big chunk of disinfo played back on us? Well. a dollar spent by them is probably $100,000 required in response by us, at the very least. Paranoia isn't hard to trip and given financial destruction has been their goal, publicly stated, since the late 90's? This already did what they needed it to do.
* BTW..... It is important to add and really consider something. They've also been saying for years that threats come many a day, every day, non stop. Even before 9/11 and that was used as logic for how it all got missed. Just mist across an ocean. That's long before we could have guessed at confirmation to just HOW much they really monitor and how that's improved. Now why pick this one, of all ones? There is just too much wrong with this one in so many ways. Logic of the other side (while, don't forget, they need us right now in Syria...unbelievably) is just one factor here.edit on 5-8-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Thorneblood
reply to post by ItDepends
Yes. I like it. On the scale of evil moves that is one the better ones. Release an army of prisoners nearly 2000 strong. If you even get half the number to side with you and had the arms to back yourself up, what could you do in one of the weaker countries like Libya or Yemen.
For a reference, Sing Sing Prison holds roughly the same number of prisoners that were released. So what could a 1000 American prisoners with guns and a plan do?edit on 5-8-2013 by Thorneblood because: (no reason given)
Al Qaeda leaders 'wanted to do something big' on Muslim holiday, sources say
A pair of suspected U.S. drone strikes killed four al Qaeda militants in Yemen as the United States maintained a heightened security alert in the country and urged all Americans to leave immediately.
Security sources told CNN about the strikes but didn't offer additional details. A Yemeni official said four drone strikes have been carried out in the past 10 day
Originally posted by Thorneblood
reply to post by ItDepends
Yes, i like it. Ancient Hatreds and modern weapons is my kinda show. It's like a good spy novel gone live action.
Originally posted by ItDepends
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by ItDepends
Wow... Ease up a bit on all that hostility. We're all entitled to our opinions. In my opinion, they are making the Mt. Everest from a rather manageable mole hill and likely one built deliberately for them to find. Now, if I'm wrong, then we're ALL in a world of hurt because unless Obama just keeps his guts on cold storage somewhere, the whole war's back on with a vengeance if something DOES happen.
That's the whole thing though. The other side is hurting as bad or worse than we are for keeping up the pace. The US is effectively out of Iraq. Leaving Afghanistan within a year at most for all but a fraction of what's been there before. Why would they want, at this moment, to turn the WHOLE thing back on and more than ever? It makes no sense.
However, another big chunk of disinfo played back on us? Well. a dollar spent by them is probably $100,000 required in response by us, at the very least. Paranoia isn't hard to trip and given financial destruction has been their goal, publicly stated, since the late 90's? This already did what they needed it to do.
* BTW..... It is important to add and really consider something. They've also been saying for years that threats come many a day, every day, non stop. Even before 9/11 and that was used as logic for how it all got missed. Just mist across an ocean. That's long before we could have guessed at confirmation to just HOW much they really monitor and how that's improved. Now why pick this one, of all ones? There is just too much wrong with this one in so many ways. Logic of the other side (while, don't forget, they need us right now in Syria...unbelievably) is just one factor here.edit on 5-8-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Sure Wrabbit, I'll ease up even though on a previous thread you indicated quite frankly and directly (you know the one) where you said that you needed to step back from your initial opinion........I'm not gonna embarrass you any more.....hypocrite and you know it....if you really have the courage, humility you will admit that......but, i suppose it's easier to march to the tune "Paranoia Blues" that anything and everything has a duplicity to it....??? Be a man....admit that you don't want 1,000 to die to please the shill that troll these pages to dump their ignorance of what is really going on!!! I thought better of you!~
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by ItDepends
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by ItDepends
Wow... Ease up a bit on all that hostility. We're all entitled to our opinions. In my opinion, they are making the Mt. Everest from a rather manageable mole hill and likely one built deliberately for them to find. Now, if I'm wrong, then we're ALL in a world of hurt because unless Obama just keeps his guts on cold storage somewhere, the whole war's back on with a vengeance if something DOES happen.
That's the whole thing though. The other side is hurting as bad or worse than we are for keeping up the pace. The US is effectively out of Iraq. Leaving Afghanistan within a year at most for all but a fraction of what's been there before. Why would they want, at this moment, to turn the WHOLE thing back on and more than ever? It makes no sense.
However, another big chunk of disinfo played back on us? Well. a dollar spent by them is probably $100,000 required in response by us, at the very least. Paranoia isn't hard to trip and given financial destruction has been their goal, publicly stated, since the late 90's? This already did what they needed it to do.
* BTW..... It is important to add and really consider something. They've also been saying for years that threats come many a day, every day, non stop. Even before 9/11 and that was used as logic for how it all got missed. Just mist across an ocean. That's long before we could have guessed at confirmation to just HOW much they really monitor and how that's improved. Now why pick this one, of all ones? There is just too much wrong with this one in so many ways. Logic of the other side (while, don't forget, they need us right now in Syria...unbelievably) is just one factor here.edit on 5-8-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Sure Wrabbit, I'll ease up even though on a previous thread you indicated quite frankly and directly (you know the one) where you said that you needed to step back from your initial opinion........I'm not gonna embarrass you any more.....hypocrite and you know it....if you really have the courage, humility you will admit that......but, i suppose it's easier to march to the tune "Paranoia Blues" that anything and everything has a duplicity to it....??? Be a man....admit that you don't want 1,000 to die to please the shill that troll these pages to dump their ignorance of what is really going on!!! I thought better of you!~
Is there something about this that prevents you from keeping a discussion out of the personal insults and attacks? That's the second time you just kinda unload on me and I still have no idea what I did to make it a personal fight? No idea whatsoever. You know me on another screen name I'm not aware of or something?? The intense dislike your message shows is so strong, its totally out of place on this thread or any other I know you from.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by ItDepends
Thanks for the time taken to come back and write that. It's appreciated and all's good. I got your other and same there.
In all honesty, I'm just glad at this point that by whatever means it ended up being, whether deception from the start or deterrence by reaction? Nothing has happened in the end here and so no one was hurt or killed. That's especially true as the statistics on attacks like the US seems to have thought were coming and still do it seems are of the type the local population takes far heavier losses than American by the nature of things, anyway. Potentially, hundreds of locals to every 1 or 2 Americans. So it's certainly something to be glad just hasn't come to pass.
Let's hope it continues with nothing happening and so long as it does, the hows aren't as important, I suppose.
Originally posted by works4dhs
I've been reading up on some WWII stufff last few weeks. Sigint (Signal Intelligence) was a major part of the covert, non-combat part of the struggle.
before D-Day the allies had a special radio team that broadcast phony traffic about a nonexistent Patton-led army preparing to invade Dover, misleading the Germans as to the when and where of the landing.
the Germans did similar before the Battle of the Bulge; their radio traffic was quiet as they passed orders through couriers and made troop/equipment movements at night to foil air recon. History shows their success at acheiving surprise.
I read years ago about how some intel people blasted the combat people in Viet Nam after the Tet offensive, showing them the intel warnings of possible enemy action. the combat general then showed them similar warnings for something like fifteen of the previous twenty weekends. the relevant one was dismissed as the same old thing.
I don't want to give the bad guys credit, but there are some very smart people over there who spend a lot of time planning and thinking. don't think they aren't well aware of the NSA and other matters over here.
I think the threat implied by the prison breaks is undervalued. presumably these guys were freed for a future operation; not for a few months, I'm sure (Christmas?), but on its way.
we'll see if we get intel scares one a month or so until we get tired of them and start disregarding them; then...bango.
that's my fear.
The leader of al Qaeda's Yemen-based wing, Nasser al-Wuhayshi, said he would free jailed Islamist militants soon, days after the United States shut missions across the Middle East because of the threat of an attack, possibly from Yemen.