It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CindyPants
I think Christians(not all, but a lot) just take things too litterally and thats why things are the way they are. Jesus didn't mean for things to be like this...
Originally posted by echelon
and is there a source for the information you provided?
Originally posted by CindyPants
Jesus was actually a very cool person. He traveled to India, and studied buddhism. I believe he was truly a wonderful, peaceful person, and very misunderstood. When Jesus was around, it was the Age Of Aquarius. He said that everytime the Age Of Aquarius comes around a majority of the people(If not all) will leave their religion and go to another one. It happened then, and it's supposed to happen again. I wonder if it'll really happen.
I'm not even a Christian, I think Christians(not all, but a lot) just take things too litterally and thats why things are the way they are. Jesus didn't mean for things to be like this...
(If you are a Christian, I hope you are not offended.. the last part is just my opinion..please respect it)
[Edited on 16-5-2003 by CindyPants]
Originally posted by Trader
Cindy thats crap. When dealing with sth as sensitive as a religious figure, its best not to put your words as theirs
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Your information is incorrect, Cindy, Chrsit did not travel to India, and the Son of God did not study under Buddha. Some stoner myths just never die.
Puff-puff, give-give.
Fida gives quite a few Asian sources to try to support Jesus in India. One is a Chinese text preserved in Tibetan (1800) called the "Glass Mirror" which mentions Yesu, "a teacher and founder of the religion who was born miraculously, proclaimed himself the Savior of the World." The text goes on to try to show that Jesus followed Buddhist principles. This tells us nothing because Nestorian monasteries were already given Imperial protection in the 7th c. Tang dynasty China. In fact Buddhist scribes from the monastic institutions were commissioned to help the Nestorians translate their gospels and texts into Chinese which took on such names as the "Jesus Messiah Sutra." On the other hand, many of the other sources Fida uncovers do make for some fascinating reading and offer some thought-provoking questions.
Hassnain and the Ahmadiyya have also identified 21 Muslim historical chronicles in Arabic, but mostly in Persian, with references to Isa (known as Yuz Asaph or various derivatives of this name) living and dying in Kashmir. From these, only two or three are original sources, the others relying on various portions of these 2/3. The earliest is the Persian "Kamal u-Din" (or an Arabic first name of a person) by Said-us-Saddiq in the late 9th c.
Finally, for me, the most interesting Isa reference is found in the Kashmiri Hindu text "Bhavishya Maha Purana" (circ. 2nd c., the name of a specific Sanskrit text of the "purana" category) about king Shalivahana (last mentioned circ. AD 80) meeting a foreigner calling himself Ishvara Putaram (Son of God), Isha Masih (Isha = Isa in Arabic = Jesus; Masih = Messiah), and Kanya Garbam (Born of a Virgin).
Originally posted by abstract_alao
Originally posted by Trader
Cindy thats crap. When dealing with sth as sensitive as a religious figure, its best not to put your words as theirs
Actually there is evidence that a great prophet went and studied with buddast monks. This text was kept sacred for a long time and has just been released. You should read more before you critize. If you still don't believe I will find info your you
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
No, there's misinformation trying to corrupt the faith, but the book that brings us the Good News of Christ explains that he did not travel to India and the Son of God did not study a religion that is not of His Father.
Gazrock, you are disrespectful.