It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LightOrange
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by IvanAstikov
Chess is definitely a good analogy. It's two men putting themselves to the test to see who is better. As chess alludes, a large part of the game is mental and strategic and not physical.
Well if it's more mental and strategical then why are there gender divides at all?
Originally posted by LightOrange
Originally posted by DeadSnow
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
reply to post by DeadSnow
Woopty doo. Some people here are were "fighters". That means jack in the real world. Like I said mma is mma it's a sport. In the real world things are different and often counter intuitive. There are plenty of women who are not " fighters" and can kick many a guys ass in a combative altercation sometimes even mma guys. Being great at mma is just that being great at mma. It doesn't correlate as much as you think outside the ring.
What are we debating? the indy 500?... Facepalm yourself.
We're discussing MMA to begin with and as a fighter or someone that has taken their interest beyond spending a few hours staring into a TV screen and cheering, I think our opinions should be taken more seriously.
Or less seriously.
Brain damage is a pretty real occurance in these kinds of sports.
However, while the overall injury rate in MMA competition is similar to that in other combat sports, the knockout rate is lower in MMA competition than in boxing, suggesting a reduced risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in MMA competition.
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
As for the the topic. There's enough science and medicine around to prove that she or he is capable of fighting at the same level, without advantage as whatever sex they feel identity with.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by LightOrange
Originally posted by DeadSnow
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
reply to post by DeadSnow
Woopty doo. Some people here are were "fighters". That means jack in the real world. Like I said mma is mma it's a sport. In the real world things are different and often counter intuitive. There are plenty of women who are not " fighters" and can kick many a guys ass in a combative altercation sometimes even mma guys. Being great at mma is just that being great at mma. It doesn't correlate as much as you think outside the ring.
What are we debating? the indy 500?... Facepalm yourself.
We're discussing MMA to begin with and as a fighter or someone that has taken their interest beyond spending a few hours staring into a TV screen and cheering, I think our opinions should be taken more seriously.
Or less seriously.
Brain damage is a pretty real occurance in these kinds of sports.
Oh? Can you post links to reputable sources showing this?
However, while the overall injury rate in MMA competition is similar to that in other combat sports, the knockout rate is lower in MMA competition than in boxing, suggesting a reduced risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in MMA competition.
Bledsoe, G. H., et al. (2006). ''Incidence of injury in professional mixed martial arts competitions.'' Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 136-142.
Now factor in boxing has a standing 8 count and MMA fights end with a TKO far quicker and your ignorance is shown.
The longer a pro fighter's career, the more likely that fighter will lose critical brain capacity, according to the results of a new neurological study conducted on pro MMA fighters and boxers.
Sarah Banks, a neuropsychologist and a researcher with the Cleveland Clinic's Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, which is based in Las Vegas, revealed the findings over the weekend at the American Academy of Neurology's annual meeting, according to a report from MedPage Today.
After studying MRI scans for 135 MMA fighters and 104 boxers, researchers found indications of a connection between the duration of a fighter's career and significant degradation in certain areas of the brain.
Originally posted by QuantriQueptidez
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
As for the the topic. There's enough science and medicine around to prove that she or he is capable of fighting at the same level, without advantage as whatever sex they feel identity with.
This is an outright lie.
The science clearly shows what is blatantly obvious: men and women are biologically different.
Men, in general, are more muscular and have superior strength to women. Women, in general, have more fat, and can be better at endurance related events.
Saying that "science and medicine around you prove" with regards to this topic, is quite disingenuous, else terribly ignorant.
According to the MedPage Today report, Banks said the findings were preliminary and called for more intensive research on the topic.