It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Zimmerman Trial

page: 201
25
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 02:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by bbracken677

Originally posted by AlexG141989

Originally posted by Soloprotocol
Whatever Happens, Zimmerman will still have to answer to the big man when HIS time comes..


Which one? Zeus, Poseidon, Hercules? Odin? Thor?

Who?


Another troll? Isn't one enough?


actually there's been two or three more. they just don't show up that much lately.
and one would surprise you.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 02:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by bbracken677

Originally posted by Grimpachi
reply to post by IvanAstikov
 


Well it is still a free country and I refuse to be intimidated because a certain group of people feel they have the right to assault myself because I am walking in the same direction.

It is better for those people to learn not to assault strangers because they may be shot and killed in self defense. This may have to happen a few more times before those people understand the law.


Amen! If there is rioting, the rioters really shouldn't come close to my home, or there will be a pile in the yard. That is, unless a police officer is willing to come and protect me. Think that will happen?

Trouble with Rioters. Strange hoodies hanging around your area...well fear not..Call The Z Man on 321 Go Go Zed.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 02:59 PM
link   
That Adam pollock dude started out with a lie, or at least he must have a good explanation


link to Advertising

edit on 10-7-2013 by Minus because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-7-2013 by Minus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:01 PM
link   
This should have been a quick squash by the judge .....
But instead she's actually considering allowing the questions?
Oh my freak'n god .. she's sooooo biased! This is insane.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Minus
 


Thing is .. it's not rebuttal. This should have been brought in during cross examination.
Rebuttal is supposed to be about something that was testified about.
Nothing was testified about in regards to his marketing procedures or his website.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by Minus
That dude started out with a lie, or at least he must have a good explanation

Link to advatice

Thanks for the link. OMG! what a an opportunist this guy is! Qoute from the site:

Zimmerman

To receive information about the training George Zimmerman received at KOKOPELLI'S GYM, please email request by filling out the form provided below.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 


yes i agree, this judge is pain in hte as s to the defense


Originally posted by EnhancedInterrogator
Thanks for the link. OMG! what a an opportunist this guy is!


Yeah, he waste no time hehe - yw

edit on 10-7-2013 by Minus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by EnhancedInterrogator
 

Maybe an opportunist. But the fact is that the state bringing it up isn't rebuttal.
This should have been in the states cross examination. They dropped the ball and
are now trying to sneak it in. The judge should have squashed it. It's outside the
proper procedures.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   
I just saw a replay of last night events when they left...

the judge left in the middle of the Defense speaking, very disrespectful.. Why is she mad at them??



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Minus
That Adam pollock dude started out with a lie, or at least he must have a good explanation


link to Advertising

edit on 10-7-2013 by Minus because: (no reason given)

edit on 10-7-2013 by Minus because: (no reason given)


that reads to me to say information on how he was trained.
not offering to train, and then and only then after the trial.

now if he was advertising it would say something like

KOKOPELLI'S GYM
The Home of the George Zimmerman work out.
Here we will show you how to use MMA style fighting to quickly handle those pesky punks.
edit on 10-7-2013 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   
Really looks like they are doing everything they can to get a mistrial somehow



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:08 PM
link   
reply to post by FlyersFan
 

Yeah, not really jermaine to the case. Just despicable.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by LeaderOfProgress

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by ButterCookie
 


I really, really hope so. I think the state already has a slight lead, and if George takes the stand they are going to romp home



You really cannot be so dense as to ignore all of the reasonable doubt... Anyways I am glad such bias is not on the jury.



It has been evident for some time now that he is just trolling.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:09 PM
link   
Looks like an email contact building scheme to me, businesses online do it all the time. Nowhere does it advertise anything about it working great for zimmerman, or anything to that effect. Just a place to type your email, and be open to future advertisement, if you want more information about zimmerman's training.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by ButterCookie
the judge left in the middle of the Defense speaking, very disrespectful.. Why is she mad at them??

Because the defense is winning and she doesn't want them too.
And because she's a sour puss.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikell
Really looks like they are doing everything they can to get a mistrial somehow

Who? the Judge? lol.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:17 PM
link   
This might actually be a precedent setting case actually, whether it is allowed in or not.



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:18 PM
link   
Newly Released Documents Detail the Department of Justice’s Role in Organizing Trayvon Martin Protests
pjmedia.com...


Among JW’s findings:

March 25 – 27, 2012, CRS spent $674.14 upon being “deployed to Sanford, FL to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.”
March 25 – 28, 2012, CRS spent $1,142.84 “in Sanford, FL to work marches, demonstrations, and rallies related to the shooting and death of an African-American teen by a neighborhood watch captain.”
March 30 – April 1, 2012, CRS spent $892.55 in Sanford, FL “to provide support for protest deployment in Florida.”
March 30 – April 1, 2012, CRS spent an additional $751.60 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance to the City of Sanford, event organizers, and law enforcement agencies for the march and rally on March 31.”
April 3 – 12, 2012, CRS spent $1,307.40 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance, conciliation, and onsite mediation during demonstrations planned in Sanford.”
April 11-12, 2012, CRS spent $552.35 in Sanford, FL “to provide technical assistance for the preparation of possible marches and rallies related to the fatal shooting of a 17 year old African American male.” – expenses for employees to travel, eat, sleep?



college students calling themselves the “Dream Defenders” barricaded the entrance to the police department demanding Lee be fired. According to the Orlando Sentinel, DOJ employees with the CRS had arranged a 40-mile police escort for the students from Daytona Beach to Sanford.

“These documents detail the extraordinary intervention by the Justice Department in the pressure campaign leading to the prosecution of George Zimmerman,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “My guess is that most Americans would rightly object to taxpayers paying government employees to help organize racially-charged demonstrations.”


If there re riots who do you think will be behind them?
edit on 033131p://bWednesday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by TKDRL
This might actually be a precedent setting case actually, whether it is allowed in or not.

It shouldn't be. This is the prosecution trying to fix their own mistake during cross exam.
If the judge lets it in, and Zimmerman is found guilty, they have a case for retrial IMHO ...



posted on Jul, 10 2013 @ 03:20 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Yes indeed it could be, and she dont want the to happen in her courtroom - its obvious shes been against the defence all the time - i really dont like her, isnt she surposed to be The most objective person there?




top topics



 
25
<< 198  199  200    202  203  204 >>

log in

join