It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by beezzer
There is no law, that I know of, that prevents a teenager from purchasing any OTC medication, such as Excedrin or Tylenol. Plan B is just another OTC.
SACRAMENTO - A bill has been signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown prohibiting minors from buying certain over-the-counter drugs.
People under 18 are no longer able to buy medicines that contain the drug Dextromethorphan, or DXM.
Not at all, but I do see a fundamental disconnect in the argument that was made. Saying the government should stay out of it by making it illegal is an oxymoron. Thats all I was saying.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Well, if that is the case than do you see any reason that the government should regulate any pharmaceutical, everything should be over the counter. Also maybe the government should not regulate tobacco or alcohol. Heck, we should all be able to own machine guns too.
I think regulations need to be in place for some things. I am actually for the government regulating some things, especially when it comes to kids.
$100? Google it. You can order a pack of 12 for less than $30 bucks right now.
I agree with a lot of what you say but where are the young kids going to get the hundred bucks to buy it? It's not as if they have a hundred dollars sitting around if they are from a lower middle class family or low income family.
. The problem is if they don't get the money by asking their parents for it they may steal it or sell things they shouldn't be selling, particularly family treasures handed down through the generations.
I think that the parents should be involved LONG before this.
I think that the parents should be involved in this.
am not saying that the pill should not be given to those who need to take it, I am saying the parents should be aware of what is happening.
Thats a very valid point, but I have yet to see any data that shows there is any inherent risk outside of short term things like nausea and vomiting.
. What if the child has a reaction to the med and nobody knows the reason. Even an estrogen compound has side effects. Even a banana has side effects to some people.
Originally posted by Wotan
Reading through this thread makes me realise how ignorant and backward some Americans really are.
In the UK we have a law called ''Ghillick Competant''. This is for minors, age does not necessary come into it and it covers a wide range of age of the minor. Basically, if a minor is deemed Ghillick competent, then the parents have no say over medications and medical procedures including abortions to the said minor. They don't even have a right to know about it. Confidentiality is between the patient (minor) and Doctor.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
reply to post by FlyersFan
The simple solution to this for all those right wingers out there wetting themselves over the state giving their daughters this... if you raised them right to start with they wouldn't need the state to supply it! If they could come to their own parents with these things then maybe they wouldn't be opening their legs so irresponsibly? Maybe, just maybe, it was all that nonsense about "praying" and "chastity" that completely failed your daughter and meant that she didn't know how her own damned body works?
Look inward here folks, if your daughter is needing this, you have bigger problems than the state supplying it. You should have educated your daughter properly, taken responsibility yourself and raised a daughter that doesn't need this in the first place.
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by kaylaluv
No-one is stopping me from parenting.
And if the government had said, sale prohibited to a minor without parental consent, I'd have no problem with it.
But the government has determined that a child needs no parental consent when determining morning-after pill access. THEY have made a unilateral decision.
Rather nice of them, don't you think?
No, they are leaving it up to you to teach your kid your rules and morals. It is YOUR decision how you raise your kids. If you do your job right, your kid will never go buy this drug, so this doesn't even affect you. But what about the kids who don't have good parents? What about the kids whose parents never taught them rules or morals? What about those kids who ended up in trouble, but have no good parents to go to for guidance? What are those kids supposed to do? Don't tell me those kids don't exist. Don't tell me those bad parents don't exist.
Originally posted by Starchildren
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Just a quick search on the internet shows that Plan B is a high dose birth control pill and the side effect can be throwing off the menses and problems with bleeding. I wouldn't call that a "mild side effect". Uncontrolled bleeding is serious and leads to transfusion or sometimes more riskier interventions for women. I love how this whole thing is being downplayed!
Originally posted by Starchildren
Originally posted by Rocker2013
reply to post by FlyersFan
The simple solution to this for all those right wingers out there wetting themselves over the state giving their daughters this... if you raised them right to start with they wouldn't need the state to supply it! If they could come to their own parents with these things then maybe they wouldn't be opening their legs so irresponsibly? Maybe, just maybe, it was all that nonsense about "praying" and "chastity" that completely failed your daughter and meant that she didn't know how her own damned body works?
Look inward here folks, if your daughter is needing this, you have bigger problems than the state supplying it. You should have educated your daughter properly, taken responsibility yourself and raised a daughter that doesn't need this in the first place.
I'm not a right winger! I'm not even religious! Why assume that parents who disagree with the accessibility of this drug to minors are all right wingers or crazy religious freaks??
I'm not trying to change your mind, you are more than entitled to your opinion.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by captaintyinknots
It's a hundred bucks here at the pharmacy for a box of two. They do not sell them singly here. A kid is probably going to get them locally instead of ordering them and having them shipped to their house where their parents may open them.
I'll never change my mind about how I feel about this law that allows anyone to buy them. You may as well forget about trying to convince me otherwise. I still remember what it was like to be a kid, I'm only fifty seven. I have an excellent memory. I also remember what people were like all my life, this knowledge is more important to me than ten degrees would be.edit on 12-6-2013 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by kaylaluv
Here's an example of good parenting:
Parent says, "There's this new drug out there to help stop an unwanted pregnancy. It will be made available to anyone, regardless of age. I have some major concerns about this drug, and it's safety. If you have a night of unprotected sex, and are scared about the consequences, please come to me first. I won't judge you, or punish you or hate you. I am on your side; I've got your back. You are not alone. We'll talk about your options, and I will help you make a decision that is right for you." I GUARANTEE you, that no kid who is told this in an honest and sincere way, will ever go behind your back and buy this drug.
I understand your point. But I truly believe that the kids who are most likely to buy this drug are the kids who have sucky parents.