It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by charles1952
And I'm confused. If it's a news story, how can it be classified?
While this may be off the topic, I don't like or trust Obama much anymore. I think the people who said "Obama, Romney, there the same and will do the same things," were seriously mistaken.
Originally posted by Y2KJMan
While I cannot know the intents of those at the top echelons of the military in their want of junior airmen not reading stories on this, I can easily say that this is not what you guys are thinking.
In the DoD (Department of Defense) there are multiple different networks that are segregated from eachother with differing classification capabilities. NIPR is what those airmen are on, and whether or not the documents have been leaked and are on The Guardian or MSNBC or Fox... those docs are still marked with the classification they originally had. Until they are scrubbed and deemed free, NIPR cannot have them on that network. Its just the standard SOP.
Its a big enough deal that something that is not as classified makes it to NIPR, to scrub the machine, the govt spends in excess of 10k to have the leak contained and fixed. EACH individual piece of data.
You can still read the articles off of NIPR, so is not like the military is being sequestered...edit on 6/10/2013 by Y2KJMan because: added last line
The notice applies to users of the Air Force NIPRNET (Non-classified Internet Protocol Router Network), which is the only way that many troops stationed overseas and on bases in the U.S. are able to access the Internet.
Originally posted by Rocker2013
reply to post by loam
I can only imagine what damage would be done if it was revealed that returning military were all on a watch list
Originally posted by FlyersFan
There was a time when I would have been very proud to have a child of mine join the US Military.
Now I'd just fear for their safety and I would highly discourage that child from joining.
Very sad.
Originally posted by charles1952
And I'm confused. If it's a news story, how can it be classified?
While this may be off the topic, I don't like or trust Obama much anymore. I think the people who said "Obama, Romney, there the same and will do the same things," were seriously mistaken.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by charles1952
And I'm confused. If it's a news story, how can it be classified?
While this may be off the topic, I don't like or trust Obama much anymore. I think the people who said "Obama, Romney, there the same and will do the same things," were seriously mistaken.
They did the same thing with the Wikileaks material and it's a serious issue not a freedom of speech thing. The regs for those guys are dead serious about Classified material. As they said in the Wikileaks case and why..of course I say I never personally read them (of course I didn't! Just heard about them... ) Classified doesn't suddenly become unclassified by public disclosure and display. It's still classified material and still highly improper or outright illegal to view and handle if you ARE a person with a Classification clearance yourself.
They're saving them from a possible career derailing or even ending screw up by the regs...not trying to restrict speech. The idea the guys aren't aware of it all is kinda silly. For all we know though, there could be things coded into the documents which their computers will quietly alert on seeing as unauthorized classified material.
I have no idea how all that 'codes which aren't codes' crap works for "tagging" classified material. I just know it does, in fact, happen that way. So... A different way to look at it.edit on 10-6-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zeeon
reply to post by loam
As a federal government Cybersecurity civil servant, I can explain to you why this is.
The NSA slides that were leaked are labeled TOP SECRET / SCI / NOFORN. They are classified.
The NSA and Federal Government have not officially unclassified those documents. Hence, they remain classified documents and the viewing of those on Unclassified systems is considered a spillage of classified information.
It might seem silly, but that is our standard operating procedure. Classified information remains in the classified domain, whereas unclassified information remains in the unclassified domain. When classified information inadverntly moves from it's domain into the unclassified domain, we refer to that as a "Spillage".
When the need arrives to move classified information into the unclassified domain, there are procedures for doing that. It's called a "Cross Domain Solution" and involves scrubbing the classified data to allow it to cross into a unclassified domain.
Another ancilliary reason for this is training. If the Government / Military allowed us to view classified material on an unclassified system, then some might percieve that as a change to the standard operating procedures. In this light, enforcing the rules (albiet silly in some respects) ensures that everyone is on the same page when it comes to handling classified material.
Hope that helps.
Originally posted by zeeon
reply to post by loam
As a federal government Cybersecurity civil servant, I can explain to you why this is.
The NSA slides that were leaked are labeled TOP SECRET / SCI / NOFORN. They are classified.
The NSA and Federal Government have not officially unclassified those documents. Hence, they remain classified documents and the viewing of those on Unclassified systems is considered a spillage of classified information.
It might seem silly, but that is our standard operating procedure. Classified information remains in the classified domain, whereas unclassified information remains in the unclassified domain. When classified information inadverntly moves from it's domain into the unclassified domain, we refer to that as a "Spillage".
When the need arrives to move classified information into the unclassified domain, there are procedures for doing that. It's called a "Cross Domain Solution" and involves scrubbing the classified data to allow it to cross into a unclassified domain.
Another ancilliary reason for this is training. If the Government / Military allowed us to view classified material on an unclassified system, then some might percieve that as a change to the standard operating procedures. In this light, enforcing the rules (albiet silly in some respects) ensures that everyone is on the same page when it comes to handling classified material.
Hope that helps.