Here it is! The final ad for the 9/11 global campaign!

Originally posted by waypastvne

Originally posted by DeeKlassified



Firstly, are you GenRadek posting under a different name? If not what has my conversation with them got to do with you?

I did not need to answer that question because I'd already said what they were covering up, and why. So if you or your alias cannot be bothered to read my posts correctly, then why should I keep repeating myself?

Anyone with half a brain could figure it out anyway, it's not like we dont discuss our reasons why 9/11 was covered up on a daily basis, and you've been around 9/11 long enough to know this!

You are just being petty because you have run out of valid arguments, so trying to make me look stupid is your last resort. Nice try, but it's pretty desperate if that is all you can bring to the discussion!

What is wrong with the NIST report ? Be specific.

probably everything,
second line.

reply to post by DeeKlassified

Firstly, are you GenRadek posting under a different name?

Woah, hold on there general. Thats a serious accusation. You want to think twice before making unprovable claims such as that. I fact, it is about the most serious accusation one can make on ATS.

Worthy of banishment if anything is. But my guess is you can't prove that either. The rest of your post was the nicest insult I've heard in a couple of pages. Keep it real.

Originally posted by waypastvne
What is wrong with the NIST report ? Be specific.

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
probably everything,

second line.

Haha, exactly Earth Citizen, most of the NIST report is BS, way too much to list!

You'd think these OS'ers would know that one of the biggest porkies NIST told was that fire alone brought down WTC7! I think waypastvne's memory is slipping! 9/11 burnout I reckon!

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

Did you JUST NOW see the light? I guess better late than never. I thought no amount of explaining, no amount of videos, no amount of anything would help some folks. But I am not really known for my patience in making long posts that are super explanatory either.

Anyone who asks will find that I have always thought that elements within the US government, Banking Industry and Military Industrial Complex were behind this. Theres more smoking gun there than in theorizing what blew up (or down) that day. I think its ridiculous to bicker about Planes/no Planes or how the towers fell.

Who Gives A Rats Ass?

I just love asking these questions and receiving no reply...

Where is the "explosives" evidence? Been asking that one on here for years...

Because I agree with

any of the "players" culpability doesn't mean that I agree with How the Towers Fell.

Iv'e said that a hundred times too. Too a hundred different people, one at a time.

BORRRING

How do you think the towers fell? When were the explosives put into place?

If it walks like duck, quacks like a duck, THEN BY GOSH IT MUST BE A DAMM DUCK!

what say you fellow?

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by DeeKlassified

 

Firstly, are you GenRadek posting under a different name?

Woah, hold on there general. Thats a serious accusation. You want to think twice before making unprovable claims such as that. I fact, it is about the most serious accusation one can make on ATS.

Worthy of banishment if anything is. But my guess is you can't prove that either. The rest of your post was the nicest insult I've heard in a couple of pages. Keep it real.

What's it got to do with you? You're not GenRadek as well are you? Why is a serious accusation? It was a sensible question, and a simple one, he was responding to my conversation to GenRadek as if it was his conversation, and now you're doing it! If you're both not him, then let GenRadek answer his own questions!

Why is it so serious? Anyone would think I just killed your cat! Care to explain why you are going so OTT about a passing comment! I'd love to hear why you're getting so worked up!

Originally posted by DeeKlassified
reply to post by intrptr

 

Here you go, just for you, I found the video..

If you're interested in 9/11 then watch all of this 5 min video, but if you want to just see the inside of the Pentagon, then you can see from about 2mins onwards that there is nothing inside the Pentagon that remotely resembles a plane.

The very first photo of the exit hole in that video shows an aircraft part inside the pentagon.


This part was located just inside the exit hole.



The red arrow is pointing to it.



It was moved to gain access to the building.



It looks like an aircraft part to me



And all the other aircraft parts found also look like aircraft parts to me.

reply by waypastvne

 

What is wrong with the NIST report ? Be specific.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

probably everything,
second line.

Emphasis added...

End of Line

Looking for explosive evidence, there's more than enough clues in this to keep OS'ers busy for a while..

I bet none of them watch it though, they're not really interested in anything that goes against the official fairy tale..

reply to post by waypastvne

Thanks. I bookmarked that one for future use. The only reason is to show others that somehow have been able to ignore it all all all these years. Not that they will ever "see the light".

Going somewhere else to "quack like a duck" now.

No further replies here.

reply to post by waypastvne


That first photo shows a pile of rubble! You've just weakened your argument with that photo! Nothing remotely like a plane in that first photo.

Like I have already said numerous times, the plane parts were planted.

Did you watch my video of the inside of the Pentagon? Weird you had no comment on why there was no plane debris inside the Pentagon.

Anyone seen any debris inside the Pentagon? Nope, didn't think so!

Originally posted by intrptr

reply by waypastvne

 

What is wrong with the NIST report ? Be specific.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07

probably everything,
second line.

Emphasis added...

End of Line

He should have asked what is correct about it. It would have been slightly easier to answer, but still tough because you have read thousands of BS pages when a little common sense explains it all about a million times better than the NIST fudgery.

Originally posted by DeeKlassified


Haha, exactly Earth Citizen, most of the NIST report is BS, way too much to list!

You'd think these OS'ers would know that one of the biggest porkies NIST told was that fire alone brought down WTC7! I think waypastvne's memory is slipping! 9/11 burnout I reckon!

I see, so you are unable answer the "be specific" part of the question. We didn't think you could.

If we were to ask you to put all evidence together and tell us what happened would it look something like this:

Everyone will eventually know that al-Qaeda never existed, acted under the control of the US Government and acted on its own initiative but with the passive complicity of the US Government to hijack planes, not hijack planes and try but fail to hijack planes, that the US Government, a small rogue element within the US Government, and Mossad operating without the knowledge of the US Government crashed the planes into the towers under remote control, crashed different planes into the towers undeer remote control, didn't crash any planes into the towers but projected holograms of the planes crashing into the towers, and didn't crash or project anything but convinced everyone that planes hit the towers by showing it to them on TV, after which the towers were blown up by explosives that made lots of explosions that everybody heard, weakened by thermite silently which explains why nobody heard any explosions, blown up by nuclear weapons in the cellar which started collapses from the top, and turned entirely to dust by energy beams from space which is why there was no debris, and that the debris pile was then kept hot for months by thermite that hadn't reacted when it all reacted to bring the towers down, and all the steel that wasn't there was immediately taken to China which is why the steel recovered shows signs of explosives, melting and dustification, and a plane, a missile, a different plane and a hologram all crashed into the Pentagon except that it was only one of them, or pulled up at the last second and flew over the Pentagon, leaving a neat 12 foot hole that caused 90 feet of the bit of the wall that had recently been reinforced to collapse, and another plane was shot down at Shanksville then landed in Cleveland leaving no wreckage at Shanksville that was spread out over too large an area to be from a crash even though it didn't exist. That's what really happened, and some day everyone will figure out how obvious it all is.

Dave

Can you put all of your evidence together and form a theory that doesn't make us laugh ?

reply to post by waypastvne


I heard they dumped some aircraft parts on the site just to make it look legitimate. I think I remember reading a helicopter was used. The NTSB which is the government agency that investigates aircraft disasters probably has tons of aircraft wreckage from previous accidents that they could have dumped at the pentagon.

I will admit that your pictures do add some legitimacy to the OS but all it would really take to close this case would be a clear video of an american or united airlines flight slamming into the pentagon and then answer WHY were local surveillance videos confiscated.

You do realise how difficult it is for a plane to hit such a low target like the pentagon? It would be tougher than trying to land it on a 10000ft runway. I have played flight simulators for years and think the best of pilots would miss more often then they would succeed. Now in this case we are talking about incompetant muslim pilots who barely had any flight training. They hardely showed up for class in florida and when they did the instructors said they were very stupid. Do the math and tell me how easy it is for such a pilot to successfully ram the pentagon that is built with concrete and steel. My gut feeling tells me even a missile would have a hard time at it, but much better chance than an aluminum plane.

reply to post by waypastvne


The hologram theory is complete BS! Just like the no plane theory in regard to the twin towers. The no plane theory holds water only for the pentagon because no one saw any airplane strike the pentagon. We do have some people witnessing a plane approaching the pentagon at a large distance but nothing concrete of people saying that the plane actually did impact the pentagon.

Even Donald Rumsfeld was suprised to hear that a plane struck the pentagon. A lieutenant colonel informed him and he accepted it. Why didn't ANYONE AT ALL see a plane hit the pentagon

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I heard they dumped some aircraft parts on the site just to make it look legitimate. I think I remember reading a helicopter was used. The NTSB which is the government agency that investigates aircraft disasters probably has tons of aircraft wreckage from previous accidents that they could have dumped at the pentagon.
...
Even Donald Rumsfeld was suprised to hear that a plane struck the pentagon. A lieutenant colonel informed him and he accepted it. Why didn't ANYONE AT ALL see a plane hit the pentagon

Nobody at all saw a helicopter dropping airplane parts on the Pentagon grounds, either....

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
Now in this case we are talking about incompetant muslim pilots who barely had any flight training.

Hani Hanjour was trained and qualified to fly BOEING 737's

reply to post by waypastvne


Fine. And what about the other pilots? You would need at least four reasonably trained pilots to crash them into their targets. And a 737 is quite different to a 767. 767 is larger and more complex plane.

Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by waypastvne

 

Thanks. I bookmarked that one for future use. The only reason is to show others that somehow have been able to ignore it all all all these years. Not that they will ever "see the light".

Going somewhere else to "quack like a duck" now.

No further replies here.

I see you didn't bother answer my question of WHAT do you think brought down the twin towers. You simply avoided it. Why do you think this is unimportant and at the same time think bush, cheney and rumsfeld are mass murderers?

If one makes serious allegations then it is wise to know what you are talking about.

reply to post by waypastvne


Just for you waypastvne...


Here is a video of 1st incident commander - Lieutenant Robert Medairos from the Arlington County police department, who was talking to the press at the Pentagon on 9/11..

Note how he says: "They said it was a plane, and I didn't see any pieces of a plane. and I couldn't believe a plane hit the building"

Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli

Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
I heard they dumped some aircraft parts on the site just to make it look legitimate. I think I remember reading a helicopter was used. The NTSB which is the government agency that investigates aircraft disasters probably has tons of aircraft wreckage from previous accidents that they could have dumped at the pentagon.
...
Even Donald Rumsfeld was suprised to hear that a plane struck the pentagon. A lieutenant colonel informed him and he accepted it. Why didn't ANYONE AT ALL see a plane hit the pentagon

Nobody at all saw a helicopter dropping airplane parts on the Pentagon grounds, either....

Who said it was a helicopter dropping the plane parts?!

Where did you pluck that from? Are you just saying that to make the planting of plane parts seem ridiculous?!

Think outside the box, there are many possible ways plane parts could have been planted!