It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
h
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
I predict great things for this campaign and for this thread!
The thread title alone got me excited let alone the campaign.
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are more than just patriots, theyre heroes.
One of those 2,000 engineers is a good friend of mine with a Masters in chemical engineering.
edit on 3-6-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
Steel melts at around 1,370°C (2500°F) it begins to lose its strength at a much lower temperature. The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel.
That is the twin towers. WTC 7 had paper, plastic fires, just like my iron cast burner has with its thin sheet of metal. Compare that thin sheet of iron to a rigid array of thick metal beams and we have a problem. For me , the pressure from the weight of the building would of pushed down on the softened metal (maybe) and then caved in. However WTC7 only had fires on one side. The softened metal beams of the one side, would of caved in but then it would of hanged on from the healthy unheated beams (and there was a clear 50%+ of them). So the building would of ended up looking a bit sad. Not a falling piece of orchestrated melted butter.