It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Here it is! The final ad for the 9/11 global campaign!

page: 1
238
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+205 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:07 PM
link   


World Trade Center Building Number 7 was an important factor in waking me up when it comes to 9/11 and the events that followed which still affect us on a daily basis on a global scale.

This one incident helped me understand that everything about that day must be questioned as there are way too many inconsistencies for the official story to be considered even remotely true.

ReThink911* (a.k.a. Operation Tip the Planet) plan on advertising this picture in September of this year so it isn't a sure shot yet as I'm sure certain entities will do whatever they can to make sure these ads don't go up.

If and once this campaign is fully launched and put into effect it has the potential to wake up the masses to the many inconsistencies of the official story and cause them to question their beliefs of what really happened that day.

My hat goes off to those who are behind this


911blogger.com...
edit on 6/3/2013 by Corruption Exposed because: (no reason given)


+4 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:12 PM
link   
Very smart move on their part to concentrate on building 7.

The theories surrounding the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and Pennsylvania tends to turn people away. Building 7 is not very well known by most people and is, in my opinion, the "foot in the door" to a new investigation.

Thanks for sharing.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:13 PM
link   
Awesome..
Thanks for sharing this.

I've always thought WTC 7 was the key to the whole ordeal.
No matter how many times I watch the replay, it ALWAYS
strikes me as odd and deliberate, the way the 47 stories fall.

What also strikes me as odd is the near silence about this building in
Major Media as well as the downplayed half assed reports from NIST.

Too much anomaly momentum .
It might be time for a new heart Mr. Cheney.


+11 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:28 PM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 

Clearly this is some kind of last ditch attempt by the left to divert attention away from events that took place under Obama's watch in Benghazi, killing four. HEAVY SARCASM spoiler alert. People say it was another Pearl Harbor and they don't mean that in a good way. I remember George Bush saying don't let the terrorist win! Go out and buy, buy, buy! New cars, refrigerators, large appliances...Then we crashed. We have already established Bush family's clear allegiance with Hitler and the Nazi Party. Right after this event so many things happened so quickly. Even though they were ALL Arabs responsible for hijacking the planes, we bombed Iraq. First thing we did was sack the museum and shore up oil interests. Cheney's subcontractors and Halliburton were booming, Rumsfeld's interest in RAPISCAN peaked when it was decided we needed his body scanners in airports. Also as a side effect of 9/11 we immediately lost considerable freedoms.

The kind of freedoms Americans pride themselves on and would never surrender...unless they were tricked into it.

Even Eisenhower warned us about allowing the MIC to get too big. Too late. Now they can wiretap you and check your library card - without reasonable cause. We lost a Constitutional protection, the 4th Amendment protecting us from illegal search and seizure. Immediately we were all subject to searches of our person and seizures of our property WITHOUT CAUSE. Even Xray machines and now DNA testing. I think they are biding their time. This ultra militaristic conservative right is waiting to get elected again to take away more freedoms. Why does Obama seem to go along? I think that he negotiates for the best of the worst. I don't think he has the POWER to buck them. Right now, this hidden cloister of government is so powerful it is capable of getting away with 9/11 and more. It is deeply ingrained and winning ground in small increments because they have a clear cut agenda and they have been doing what they do for a long time. I think they killed King, both Kennedy's and Lennon. Begin, Gandhi. Anyone the people follow has to go. It's a given and why it eventually happens to all who question the status quo - their authority, who the people worship, in any country you might be in.

Their NWO agenda is absolute and total control over THE PEOPLE. They also want experimental use and extermination of some populations. For example, the inferior, the troublesome, small tribes holding up logging interests in the rainforest, Alaskans preventing drilling. Their mission is to CONTROL EVERYTHING, OWN EVERYTHING AND EXPLOIT THE PLANETS RESOURCES, making sure they squeeze them out down to the last drop, cutting a swath of death and destruction in the process. And of course they want to make virtual if not literal "slaves" to them and what they offer, out of the people. They discuss this diabolical plan for world wide domination yearly at the Bilderberg Meetings.



All this should be fairly obvious if you are at least 50 years old.


edit on 3-6-2013 by newcovenant because: (no reason given)


+9 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:50 PM
link   
I think people are sick of hearing about 9/11 conspiracies at this point in time which is a shame because I do believe that was the goal of those involved with this false flag attack. Same goes for the recent mass shootings like Sandy Hook and Colorado. Real questions and observations become overshadowed with nonsense conspiracy theories that end up flooding the questioning pools to the point where people just become sick and tired of hearing and discussing it making them only want to move on. Hologram planes flying into WTC 1 & 2 come to mind.

But we should never forget these events and more importantly never stop asking questions because if one thing is a proven fact it's that the US gov't is run by corrupt and immoral liars who led us to a false war in Iraq not long after these 3 towers fell so to believe their official story would be a huge mistake because if we are to believe them word for word then at best 9/11 happened because our Gov't is run by idiots who ignore intelligence and investigate nothing. After 9/11 did anyone get fired, written up, or even suspended?

Let's not forget about other false flags proven to be true like the Gulf of Tonkin.

And to add to the OP's topic of the WTC 7 tower here's the BBC reporting live that it fell before it actually fell.


edit on 3-6-2013 by Swills because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 04:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 

I predict great things for this campaign and for this thread!

The thread title alone got me excited let alone the campaign.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are more than just patriots, theyre heroes.

One of those 2,000 engineers is a good friend of mine with a Masters in chemical engineering.



edit on 3-6-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 05:00 PM
link   
SnF

People should post this on their social networking sites


Spread the truth.
edit on 3/6/13 by OpenEars123 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 05:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
 

I predict great things for this campaign and for this thread!

The thread title alone got me excited let alone the campaign.

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth are more than just patriots, theyre heroes.

One of those 2,000 engineers is a good friend of mine with a Masters in chemical engineering.



edit on 3-6-2013 by gladtobehere because: (no reason given)
h
As painfully obvious that it is that 9/11 had help from the inside
this could never come to life or its the end of America.

Nobody would ever trust the US. and no american would ever trust the
white house.

Keeping the truth about 9/11 secret IS a matter of national security.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 05:20 PM
link   
Starring and flagging for getting the word out.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 05:34 PM
link   
If your a patriot or decent human being you will flag this thread


Even if it's just to let our digital spies know 9/11 will NEVER be forgotten.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 06:01 PM
link   
Building seven, especially the way it fell--near perfect symmetrical global collapse--
is the smoking gun for me.

It always has been.

I can be compelled (by arguments) against almost all the other damning evidence--and
there exists A MOUNTAIN of it...stock trades, molten material etc., etc.

But I cannot be swayed on building seven. My subconscious won't allow it. That intuitive little voice
in my head is smarter than the conscious part that does most of my thinking---and he won't budge in
this case. He can't be coerced, compelled, or cajoled. And he ain't buying the Official Story---AT ALL.
edit on 3-6-2013 by rival because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 06:05 PM
link   
When I jam pack my iron cast burner with wood and its been burning for 30 minutes at furious rate, the iron doesn't even glow (which suggests its weakened).

The iron cast burner is even made out of a thin layer of iron, the same width of a coin!

But I have to be honest and quote this.




Steel melts at around 1,370°C (2500°F) it begins to lose its strength at a much lower temperature. The steel structure of the World Trade Center would not have to melt in order for the buildings to lose their structural integrity. Steel can be soft at 538°C (1,000°F) well below the burning temperature of jet fuel.


That is the twin towers. WTC 7 had paper, plastic fires, just like my iron cast burner has with its thin sheet of metal. Compare that thin sheet of iron to a rigid array of thick metal beams and we have a problem.

For me , the pressure from the weight of the building would of pushed down on the softened metal (maybe) and then caved in. However WTC7 only had fires on one side. The softened metal beams of the one side, would of caved in but then it would of hanged on from the healthy unheated beams (and there was a clear 50%+ of them). So the building would of ended up looking a bit sad. Not a falling piece of orchestrated melted butter.
edit on 3-6-2013 by jonnyc55 because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-6-2013 by jonnyc55 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 06:24 PM
link   
reply to post by jonnyc55
 





That is the twin towers. WTC 7 had paper, plastic fires, just like my iron cast burner has with its thin sheet of metal. Compare that thin sheet of iron to a rigid array of thick metal beams and we have a problem. For me , the pressure from the weight of the building would of pushed down on the softened metal (maybe) and then caved in. However WTC7 only had fires on one side. The softened metal beams of the one side, would of caved in but then it would of hanged on from the healthy unheated beams (and there was a clear 50%+ of them). So the building would of ended up looking a bit sad. Not a falling piece of orchestrated melted butter.


Well put. The symmetry of the collapse is THE MOST suspicious part.

Even if i over-ride my gut instinct and try to entertain the notion that (perhaps) some steel
was weakened in the building--that somehow an (office and building material) fire could account
for the type of heat needed to collapse the building---that maybe the steel in the building
wasn't up to code strength--perhaps bought buy some union insider who's Uncle Joey
owns a smelting plant and was trying to save a few bucks on quality steel and a little insider
Gambino-type municipal contract trading and grift scheme.....I still CANNOT see how this
building didn't fall in an un-symmetrical way....It just COULDN'T have happened.

It would have collapsed VERY unsymmetrical. A column at a time, the facade on one side first, and then
perhaps a corner or the middle section..and IT MOST CERTAINLY would NOT have experienced GLOBAL
collapse. Even if fire alone would have brought this building down, it would have been an ugly. drawn
out process...and when the smoke cleared and the fire was out...it would have required a wrecking
crew to take the rest of the building down....
edit on 3-6-2013 by rival because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 06:32 PM
link   
"If you build it, they will come"


We start with people who ask questions, which leads to a conversation, which leads to a debate, which leads to intrigue, which leads to awareness and eventual desire to spread that awareness, which leads to these campaigns..

If you think about it, regardless of the time that has passed, progress is being made in peoples awareness of things being more then coincidence.

As to if this is the best course of action, I am not one to say, but progress is progress.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 06:55 PM
link   
reply to post by jonnyc55
 


But wouldn't your theory apply to all other buildings framed with steel? Why have there been no other buildings to collapse as the two towers and why did they collapse the same way when damaged in entirely different ways?

As to the OP, thanks. 9/11 is out of vogue, so to speak. Keep bringing it up.

CJ



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 09:26 PM
link   


Payday Monsanto



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 09:33 PM
link   
The wheels keep turning, and the net keeps closing in...

Those that seek the truth will NEVER fold, or give up!

Nice to see this, and hopefully more and more people will start waking up...


I see no OS defenders are about on this thread, they're probably sick of having their asses handed to them time and time again!


Nice work OP.



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 09:38 PM
link   
It would be a good opportunity to make the ad a little bigger and then ask....

Why was the CCTV and video footage of the Pentagon immediately confiscated. Wouldn't you want everyone to see the plane hitting it and release the video's to prove the official story. not go the other way and not show any footage other than one blurry video that would never hold up in a courtroom as evidence.

How did they [FBI] know to be ready to collect the video's without prior knowledge of the attacks ?

How does a 747 hit a brick building and not leave and marks where the wings would of hit ?

Why does the hole in the wall of the pentagon not even come close to the size of a 747's body ?

Where was the debris of the plane from the Shanksville crash site ? No plane debris, no luggage, no bodies, no blood............nothing. Just a hole in the ground [that was there on Google earth 2 years before the crash], but then after the "crash" the hole now had been dug out deeper to include a wingspan. [Someone obviously forgot to put that bit in at the Pentagon "crash" site]

Who were the shareholders that sold their Untied airlines stocks in the 48 hours before 9/11, making a very healthy profit from a supposed terrorist attack, as the price of the share's decreased dramatically after the attacks.

Building 7 was brought down demolition style. So how did they get the building rigged up to be demolished unless they knew in advance to bring it down ? Remember that it takes weeks, not hours to rig up a building, especially one of building 7's size !


I have many more questions that could be added. but this ad is a good starting point. The trouble is, those that believe the official story will never believe, or even listen to what we are saying because the official story is easy for them to digest and gets them to sleep easier at night !



posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 09:46 PM
link   
I did not realize that there were many people who do not know about WTC 7. THAT is the one thing, aside from the Pentagon fiasco, that made me realize that these events MUST have been part of a conspiracy. Considering that if there was any fire damage in building 7, there should not have been much jet fuel, if any, to name one thing. And secondly, any structural damage would have taken place near the floors where the fire took place. A freefall collapse at around 9.8 m/s suggests to me that this tower collapsed from the base. And I do not believe a fire would get hot enough to cause structural failure at the altitude where the fire took place, at least not enough damage to bring the entire building down.


+8 more 
posted on Jun, 3 2013 @ 09:56 PM
link   
The owner of the WTCs buildings (Larry Silverstein) made over $2 billion profit from their collapse.

The Israeli agent of the brokerage that sold the airlines short for a profit of $15 billion successfully hid who was to profit from the stock collapse.

This was a set-up. It was murder for profit. Do we have enough courage and power to arrest the offenders??



new topics

top topics



 
238
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join