It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FollowTheWhiteRabbit
Thus, we have three choices: Christ was either a liar, a lunatic, or Lord.
But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub the prince of the devils.
-- Matthew 12:24
Originally posted by windword
What makes you think that the New Testament, which wasn't written until many, many years after the the supposed death of Jesus and his disciples, wasn't back engineered to retrofit the Old Testament?
Originally posted by windword
Outside of the bible, there is no proof of the existence of the person called Jesus in the Bible.
Source
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
- Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63
(Based on the translation of Louis H. Feldman, The Loeb Classical Library.)
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
Originally posted by windword
What makes you think that the New Testament, which wasn't written until many, many years after the the supposed death of Jesus and his disciples, wasn't back engineered to retrofit the Old Testament?
The question is what would their motivation for this be? The first Christians believed that Jesus is the Christ. We know they believed because they would have rather died, faced persecution, prosecution, torture, ridicule, being outcast and ostracized, then deny that they believed that Jesus is the Christ. Christians are still treated like this in many places so it should come as no surprise. The reason they said they believed is because they saw Him perform miracles, raise the dead, cure the sick, cast out demons, speak Words of spirit, truth, wisdom and life, fulfill ancient prophesies, endure unimaginable suffering as only an infinitely benevolent God could, heard God confirm Jesus is His Son when He spoke from Heaven saying so. The most convincing evidence for the first Christians was of course hanging out with the same Jesus whom they had buried, for 40 days after they saw Him crucified.
Originally posted by windword
Outside of the bible, there is no proof of the existence of the person called Jesus in the Bible.
(Emphasis added)
This statement is simply not true.
Source
About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.
- Jewish Antiquities, 18.3.3 §63
(Based on the translation of Louis H. Feldman, The Loeb Classical Library.)
Keep in mind this is the writing of a very respected and reputable historian, and a Jewish historian mind you.edit on 30-5-2013 by mrphilosophias because: (no reason given)
"Its brevity disproves its authenticity. Josephus' work is voluminous and exhaustive. It comprises 20 books. Whole pages are devoted to petty robbers and obscure seditious leaders. Nearly forty chapters are devoted to the life of a single king. Yet this remarkable being, the greatest product of his race, a being of whom the prophets foretold ten thousand wonderful things, a being greater than any earthly king, is dismissed in a dozen lines." John Remsburg, The Christ (29)
There is much more, of course, although one would think this argument alone would suffice to prove this passage is fake in toto. Yet, because it often contended that the TF is the "best evidence" for Christ's historicity, it is fought for tooth and nail. Hence, the existence of the world's most famous man essentially rests on a brief and palpably bogus forgery.
freethoughtnation.com...
Reincarnation in Early Christianity
For centuries this was the mainstream view of Christianity but 300 years later it became a huge issue and the belief was made illegal because Emperor Constantine believed it was dangerous to the Empire to believe in reincarnation
truthorheresy.com...
Originally posted by arpgme
reply to post by SQUEALER
Keep in mind that "Lord" does not mean God. It means Ruler or Master.
Even Moses and other prophets were called "Lords".