It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Is that also true for Bush Sr. and Bush Jr., who have also had marines hold umbrellas for them?
Picturesedit on 5/17/2013 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
(Pukes in anger)
The manual states that a commander “may interpret the provisions of this Manual to address specific concerns whenever necessary.”
...
TheBlaze contacted the the Marines’ and was also referred to Title 10 responsibilities of the United States Code, specifically this portion of the section (emphasis added):
...
the Marine Corps shall provide detachments and organizations for service on armed vessels of the Navy, shall provide security detachments for the protection of naval property at naval stations and bases, and shall perform such other duties as the President may direct.
...
Given that the president is defined as the Commander in Chief “of the Army and Navy of the United States…” by the Constitution and that fact that the Marines’ dress code protocol says “the Commandant or higher authority” can authorize “articles that are not authorized for wear as a part of a regulation uniform,” is the president considered a commander with this ability?
The spokesperson for the Marines said “certainly.”
Originally posted by muse7
non issue
Originally posted by watcher3339
reply to post by muse7
Really? Exactly what part is a non-issue. The apparent arrogance toward or ignorance of operating protocol? While spending the last few days outraged and apologetic for what he doesn't know about myriad other aspects of the country he is leading? The anger this has stirred in those who have served and their families? Or the loss of support he has scored in those, like myself, who voted for him but are increasingly asking what the hell is up with all this nonsense.
It's an issue.
Originally posted by watcher3339
reply to post by muse7
Really? Exactly what part is a non-issue. The apparent arrogance toward or ignorance of operating protocol? While spending the last few days outraged and apologetic for what he doesn't know about myriad other aspects of the country he is leading? The anger this has stirred in those who have served and their families? Or the loss of support he has scored in those, like myself, who voted for him but are increasingly asking what the hell is up with all this nonsense.
It's an issue.
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by squarehead666
But the Guantanamo hunger strike doesn't rate a mention?
Morons not eating in protest deserve no respect, nor sympathy.
I just finished a sandwich for them. It was great.
But....
Originally posted by muse7
non issue
Originally posted by MrSpad
Of course anybody in the military knows their chain of command and who is at the top of that chain. And if he asks you to do something you do it.
Military personnel are not drones who solely do what they are told because of the chain of command.