posted on Nov, 5 2004 @ 08:39 PM
Umm a few things to add to the thread (or a few info fixes)
The Old Testament- was written by babylon scribes who worked in the kingdom temples, using old mesopotamian scripts, and some other scripts. The Old
Testament was written to mostly document history and some future events
Mesopotamia was the first human civilization and *appeared out of nowhere* (scientists wonder how it happened). No records of Homo-Sapians existing
before Mesopotamia seem to exist, which means Mesopotamia and Homo-Sapians *sprouted into being* at the same time(scientist "wonder" how it
happened). Not only did Mesopotamia and Homo-Sapians spring up at the same time, Mesopotamia also sported schools, library's, society heirarchy,
religion, medicine, and other practices
FYI: Mesopotamia became Babylon and is now Iraq
*however, the old testament is now much more concealed than it was when it was first made. the first old testament basically explained how we were
created by aliens, why the aliens came, how DNA works, etc. etc., and before the dark ages that kind of stuff was common knowledge. The current old
testament now however has been so coded and concealed that the meaning you get out of it is nowhere near what you would have gotten 3,000 years ago
out of it*
Now when someone untrained reads the Old Testament, they get a sort of "fake history, neo-mind-controll" propaganda.
What happened to the Old Testament is what happened to almost all religious texts. It started out as history, but that text was later encoded by
governments and mind controll text was added.
The New Testament- was mostly written by and finally 'published' by the romans to 1.) Controll the people and 2.) Conceal the history and future
into code
The New Testament was mainly a mind controll device first, and a documentation of future events second (in order to understand what the New Testament
was predicting and what it meant, you had to be trained. if you werent trained, reading the New Testament would have an even greater mind controlling
effect than the old testament)
The Old Testament contained mostly history, this was distorted and concealed to contain encoded history + mind controll
The New Testament contained mostly mind controll when it was first created, thats why it didnt need to be currupted as much as the Old Testament
(there wasn't much history in the New Testament, and most of the things that governments would want to add was allready inplace by publishing
time)
____________________________________________________________
As for "omg wtf are you talking about, your saying that the scribes that wrote the testaments actually knew of future events and wrote them down? how
is that possible?"
Yes it is possible to see into the future. *Magical Powers* do exist.
But I'll let you decide for yourself on whether thats true or not.
All the anti-christ stuff in the bible is becoming true right now even, and to most christians that makes them think that the mind-controll stuff is
also true. But this is not the case
This is the effect it was meant to have.
As the predictions part comes true, the people will believe in the mind controll part (because the other *half* is true, it must all be true).
All a ruler would have to do is first make it seem like the predictions are coming true (thus making people believe the mind controll part). After
that happens, you can manipulate the controlled public any way you wish as long as your smart and know how to do it.
Also, most Religious texts are almost identicle to the Bible in actual *meaning*(like the Karran, forget how to spell it).
Does this mean we worship the same god? Or does this mean we are falling for the same trap?
Anyway, I think I've said enough *bull#* for one post.
Anyone got comments?
EDIT: I can also answere a question if you got one
[edit on 5-11-2004 by aukaiman55]