It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by michaelmcclen
Here, you got me thinking.
People who know about these SAS squads know they were kill squads (shoot first) so anyone going there would not stand a chance.
So why didn't they shoot 'em?
The lost Sandringhams
During one of these searches a Norfolks regimental cap badge was found buried in the sand along with the corpses of a number of soldiers.The find was reported to the Rev Charles Pierre-Point Edwards, MC, who was in Gallipoli on a War Office mission to find out what had happened to the 5th Norfolks. It was likely that he had been sent there by Queen Alexandra.
The first piece of new evidence was an account of a conversation with the Rev Pierre-Point Edwards some years after the war, which revealed an extraordinary detail he omitted from his official report about the fate of the 5th Norfolks - namely, that every one of the bodies he found had been shot in the head.
It was known that the Turks did not like taking prisoners. This was confirmed by the second piece of evidence, which told the story of Arthur Webber, who fought with the Yarmouth Company of the 5th Norfolks during the battle of August 12, 1915.
Can the true fate of the 5th Battalion now be more fully explained?
In that after their bold dash through the wood on the 12th of August…
Colonel Beauchamp and the Sandringhams were overwhelmed by their Turkish enemies…
They were either captured or they surrendered…
The Turks took no prisoners…
So they were butchered…and buried.
Is this what became of the Vanished Battalion?
Originally posted by defcon5
The following is my opinion as a member participating in this discussion.
There are probably some IRA guys sitting in a bar somewhere saying: “remember that time that we put on those gray rubber suits with the big foam heads and scared the #### out of those commandos that were waiting to ambush us...”As an ATS Staff Member, I will not moderate in threads such as this where I have participated as a member.
Originally posted by CirqueDeTruth
reply to post by JayinAR
Nothing. It's just blown up from the original OP to get a better look at the aliens these military men claimed they saw.
Nothing more, nothing less. Just a closer look at what they say they saw. If, it is an accurate rendition of what they saw.
Cirque
Im pretty sure they are to shoot any confirmed aliens no matter what. I think what happened here is that the aliens used their mind control powers and made them run away.
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
To the 'why didn't they shoot them brigade', as said they are highly trained soldiers who do NOT shoot first unless its a planned part of the brief, targets are confirmed before the operation, non combatants are ignored unless they prove to be a threat and even then only after a go is given.
Opening up on an unexpected set of individuals is a no because it gives away any element of surprise, in the case of being sighted by unknowns the unit would withdraw in 99% of cases unless the unit was sure they were not part of the opposing force.
Originally posted by CirqueDeTruth
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Im pretty sure they are to shoot any confirmed aliens no matter what. I think what happened here is that the aliens used their mind control powers and made them run away.
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
To the 'why didn't they shoot them brigade', as said they are highly trained soldiers who do NOT shoot first unless its a planned part of the brief, targets are confirmed before the operation, non combatants are ignored unless they prove to be a threat and even then only after a go is given.
Opening up on an unexpected set of individuals is a no because it gives away any element of surprise, in the case of being sighted by unknowns the unit would withdraw in 99% of cases unless the unit was sure they were not part of the opposing force.