It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

British SAS in 'Alien' Riddle : “little grey men” walk into ambush - then vanish

page: 3
83
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   
reply to post by nomadros
 


Off topic: I do have to laugh at our British tabloids the crap they put in them. The Sun is just pathetic, the daily star is for the dedicated white British male who only tends to agree with keeping everything British and also has an interest in seeing female breasts or a story related to sex. The daily sport might as well be a soft porn newspaper with the odd fake story involving a woman who just happened to have a DD breast size



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:27 PM
link   
Wow wow wow

Pff i have studies many cases but never heard of this one , but what the hell , the thread title looks like its the title of a spielberg script


thanks great find , this is food for the brain


TheGreazel



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


Spot on.. They would rather stay hidden until they have confirm visual on THEIR actual target. SAS will not move or compromise their position unless its very nessassary



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:36 PM
link   
This is why its so easy for those in government
who may know of ET existence to say that's impossible.

It's SO easy to say,
" What a load of crap", and I think they count on it, & the story not
going anywhere.
Maybe it was a hoax, but to simply say "no that sounds crazy"
and then call it debunked, without checking it out, or sh** even reading it?

Come on...there are tons of UFO alien sightings,
All hoax? All CGI? All people with ridiculous time on their hands to pull these things off?

And Im not talking about posters here but;
Many debunkers are just brown nosing followers
trying to show they are the teachers pet and are eager to help them up cover up.
Whether they've put research in or not.

If there is a 2% chance the story is true, that's huge.
Let me remind you, we are talking about extra terrestrial life.
The biggest story ever. So don't they deserve a bit of attention?
If there are cover ups; Stop helping them do their job.



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:38 PM
link   



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


Exactly right.as terrible as that time was, it was not a true war zone.
All targets were NOT considered hostile.
The SAS team was surely breifed on who and what to look for....
And 4 foot tall greys were most likely not a target.



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:43 PM
link   
reply to post by gortex
 


Good point but at least it is not the sunday sport remember the Nazi bomber found on moon one.
Still it is entertaining but you also are correct the SAS don't talk about there mission's now if it was group of squaddies it may be more likely, still it does not make any claim that they moved or fired on the Grays only that they stared at one another meaning that the Grays were aware of there presence, The only reason the SAS did not wipe the IRA out is that they are professionals and back during the troubles they were feet from the head of the IRA listening to every word but knew that his death would merely have split the terrorist into fractured cells meaning more civilian deaths and less control.
Still I hold the people on the same level as the Sun and just above the sunday sport but the pictures were not as interesting.
edit on 27-4-2013 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Death_Kron

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....


Dude you need chill out. Some of your replies have been quite rude. An SAS patrol can sit out in an ambush position for days without firing a shot. If the SAS witnessed several beings but WASN'T their target then all they will do is sit and gather infomation. put yourself in the soldiers boots, your a small patrol deep in enemy territory waiting an ambush and you see four small figures and NOT your target. You sit tight and watch .. After all the 4 small people they witnessed could of simply been children

Now imagine the headline SAS shoot dead four children .. Yeah that would go down well

Also what would you do if you witnessed something you've never ever seen before.



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by Death_Kron

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....


Pray tell what you think their procedure is for dealing with random extraterrestrial encounters during a stakeout, Einstein?



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by sealing

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


Exactly right.as terrible as that time was, it was not a true war zone.
All targets were NOT considered hostile.
The SAS team was surely breifed on who and what to look for....
And 4 foot tall greys were most likely not a target.


Are you even British?

All military personnel stationed in Ireland at that period of time had the auth to shoot to kill ......

But that's not even the point here, a fully trained SAS 4 man combat team sits back and watches "some greys"

Pun not intended but what frigging planet are you on?



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by ThePeaceMaker

Originally posted by Death_Kron

Originally posted by Rubic0n

Originally posted by ZetaRediculian

Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
 


SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.


OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.


If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.


An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....


Dude you need chill out. Some of your replies have been quite rude. An SAS patrol can sit out in an ambush position for days without firing a shot. If the SAS witnessed several beings but WASN'T their target then all they will do is sit and gather infomation. put yourself in the soldiers boots, your a small patrol deep in enemy territory waiting an ambush and you see four small figures and NOT your target. You sit tight and watch .. After all the 4 small people they witnessed could of simply been children

Now imagine the headline SAS shoot dead four children .. Yeah that would go down well

Also what would you do if you witnessed something you've never ever seen before.


"you see four small figures and"

Not #ing aliens!



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 12:51 PM
link   
reply to post by ThePeaceMaker
 


Try over a week in icy and wet conditions #ting in your soaking uniform not moving to keep your position from being compromised while waiting for your specific target with your rifle far behind enemy line's inside the enemy's compound, these guys are never rewarded enough for there action's but they are amongst the bravest and most deadly protectors the west has had and it is a true shame non ever became prime minister but it is our lot to have cowards for leaders and brave men for fertiliser.



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 01:19 PM
link   
HO HUM

Yet another news story that's going to go nowhere in terms of a concrete outcome

What the hell do these aliens want anyway?

If they are for real, why not just show themselves, I mean we may be as cattle or ants to them, but the truth is - and even they have to know it - that we are pretty intelligent, intelligent enough to process their existence!

I guess this extra-terrestrial life form accessing our planet wants something we don't want to give up actually! Hence all the sneaking about - but this stealth mode is really starting to get on my nerves!!!

If they're not real what is this mass-madness that makes people see little grey chappies for brief time periods. Eh?



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 01:46 PM
link   
ok - a few of my opinions :

1 - " the people " is a 3rd rate comic - writtem by idiots , read by delinquents and believed by morons

2 - the SAS are the most proffessional military unit on the planet - they are not a gaggle of NEDs prone to siting around seeing who can drink a bottle of bucky in under 30 seconds - when an SAS corporal files a recce report - generals take note and re-write thier plans to reflect the new intel .

this is not something that thebritish army would ` laugh off ` - assuming it happened

and the men of thier squadron would certainly not " laugh off " a account that 8 troopers agreed on - however implausible it sounded -

its hard to convey the esscence of " esprit de corps "- but it fosters ABSOLUTE trust you will jump off a ledge blind folded if your section leader tells you its safe

and if 8 SAS troopers claim to have seen marvin the martian - my instinctive reaction would be do i believe they really did - or assume they had been exposed to a CBW agent ? - and TBH - i would persue both possibilities concurrently

3 - the chances of an SAS trooper agreeing to be interviewed by a self styled ` belfast UFO investigator ` = ZERO



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 01:54 PM
link   
reply to post by mirageman
 


It's the first time that I read something like this. Really great article from the OP , I wonder why not one of them shot one of the aliens because then they would have had proof for leaving the stakeout ...?



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 01:56 PM
link   
People want to know why when someone see´s an alien being its paralized and engulf in fear. You may not like the truth behindm you may believe or not what i am going to say, its your choice.

When a human see an alien being (not a craft) the human body have some instructions in our own DNA that kicks inn, this instructions where place by aliens long time, the instructions its paralize and fear! No matter how strong you are how mentally tought and train you are this instruction kicks inn when you see an alien being. Even the most elite black ops who have fight in wars like iraq and afganistang have fear in presence with an alien. The only way you can supress this induce fear is by the alien themselves, they can in some way supress this instruction in your body. Of course most of the times aliens dont do that becasue its normal prosedure for them dealing stuff in our planet and they dont want humans kicking and punching around EBEs.

Actually EBEs or "greys" has you know them are no more than organic androids, its not a "race" of aliens, people think that greys are the real deal Extraterrestrials but they are relativy mistaken, Greys are the workforce of the real Extraterrestrials. They are organic beings created for the only purpose to do the hard work of the real Aliens in our planet and billions more tru the galaxy and universe at least in our 3D land perspective (you know there are more dimensions but lets not complicate ourselfs). Aliens have a vast amount of faccilities tru our solar system and Greys (or ebes) are created like we created cars in mass production. Actually even some black ops but the real deep blackops who have some dealings with aliens use Greys!!! yep believe or not they actually use them (with the help of the real aliens) to do their work heck they can mimic and abduction scenario if they want to!.

By the way Greys are not this "race" who is dying and need our genetic code to make hybrids! They are constructed in that way (no sexual organs no common organs with humans like digestive) because they are Androids! So the stories about making hybrids have some truth but not for the purpose of "saving their dying race", thats just a story trow out so people may fear alien stuff. Of course EBEs or Greys come in different shape and sizes like cars!.

And about the abductions most of the times are physcall check ups, every human being on this planet its check out most of the times this erase from our memories, other times they let some of this memories stay another times they put different scenario instead of the check up and you wake up and say gosh i have a bad dream or a nightmare and your life goes normally after that. The one who let some glips to remember are people who can endure this and dont affect them in their normal daily life.

You maye believe it or not this info. Its your choice



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 02:14 PM
link   



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 02:28 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 27 2013 @ 02:33 PM
link   



new topics

top topics



 
83
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join