It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....
Originally posted by sealing
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
Exactly right.as terrible as that time was, it was not a true war zone.
All targets were NOT considered hostile.
The SAS team was surely breifed on who and what to look for....
And 4 foot tall greys were most likely not a target.
Originally posted by ThePeaceMaker
Originally posted by Death_Kron
Originally posted by Rubic0n
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Originally posted by IvanAstikov
reply to post by Death_Kron
SAS members are highly disciplined and are hardly likely to take potshots at a target that wasn't on their mission briefing, just because it looked a little freaky.
OK. So which is it? "Shoot first" but not at anything that looks a little freaky? So you are saying they couldn't identify what they saw. Something doesn't add up.
If a SAS team is send out to take out a bunch of IRA guys they will not give away their presence by shooting at something they do not recognize.
An SAS team also wouldn't sit there and watch aliens idiot.....
Dude you need chill out. Some of your replies have been quite rude. An SAS patrol can sit out in an ambush position for days without firing a shot. If the SAS witnessed several beings but WASN'T their target then all they will do is sit and gather infomation. put yourself in the soldiers boots, your a small patrol deep in enemy territory waiting an ambush and you see four small figures and NOT your target. You sit tight and watch .. After all the 4 small people they witnessed could of simply been children
Now imagine the headline SAS shoot dead four children .. Yeah that would go down well
Also what would you do if you witnessed something you've never ever seen before.