It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
reply to post by MysticPearl
I assessed what I can see based off of my training, and expirence. But whatever, lets keep ignorance strong on this site.
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
Originally posted by tropic
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
Originally posted by MysticPearl
Here's one point of yours I question. You said the woman in red has a head injury. You acknowledged she does not have any blood on her after the explosions as we see here. This picture lends itself to the theory she has no head injury whatsoever. At least external.
As someone who's had two serious head injuries, the blood is apparent immediately. The fact she had on a white shirt under her jacket and no blood on her in any picture other than the one on a stretcher is very odd. No blood after the blast for multiple frames, yet covered in blood on the stretcher?
And you say head injuries take precedence over controlled blood injuries. I agree, to an extent. Not when there's a double amputee sitting right next to her and she shows no signs of a head injury, as we see in pictures after the blast.
The image I want to post isn't censored so I won't, but it's the one maybe a minute after the blast where the double amputee is lying there, on his right side, left leg in the air, while the woman in red is mysteriously suddenly gone, and we have people offering assistance both to the person on his right and to his left, while he's ignored. The idea three people in the double amputee's direct vicinity would be helped first, the woman in red along with the other two is ridiculous in my eyes.
There is no blood dripping from the guys raised left leg either. What's more telling to me is this picture right after the blast
where again we see no blood spilled from the double amputee. We have a lady laying there with no blood on her head or neck, or white shirt, who's considered a priority over a double amputee, then we see her covered in blood minutes later on a stretcher, which is very odd, and that's in addition to the double amputee not shown bleeding at any point. Not even the minute after the blast. That just doesn't happen.
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
reply to post by wrdzrd
Originally posted by Mykah
This entire thread is a reaction to points I raised originally in a different thread. Since exposing this to be a false flag my work was censored and I was banned from the David Icke forums. I then brought my observations here yesterday, since then the OP has thrown his credentials on the table time and time again while questioning mine in an attempt to discredit my observations. This is an incomplete analysis with only 3 photographs, no series of time, and no frame by frame analysis. His observations are aneqdotal and do not speak to the series of events that are presented when viewing the situation as a whole. He also edited out one of the most important parts, the gap in the tourniquet.
I do not doubt his experience so much as his motives. I will be creating my own thread tomorrow with an in depth analysis of every photo available which pertains to this staged event rather then pander to this half baked rebuttle to what was originally my own ideas and observations.
You are being told this false flag was real by an ex-army personel. Just step back and think about that before making up your mind.
This will be my last post in this thread.
Originally posted by MysticPearl
Originally posted by tropic
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
Forget the hair, and this was the pic I was looking for but this one is censored, but the much larger issue to me is why everyone in this pic is being attended to besides the guy who apparently had his legs blown off.
Doesn't fit to me nor seem logical, even if head injuries are deemed the larger concern. That is not a valid excuse for what this pic is showing.
And we're supposed to believe paramedics came and not only attended to the lady in the red jacket, but pciked her up and put her on a stretcher first, while completely ignoring this guy. So the lady laying there with no blood on her head or white shirt, sitting right next to the double amputee had paramedics come up, ignore the double amputee, assume she was at greater risk and attended to and moved her while not even checking on the guy who had both legs blown off, with inches of her?
Also a question I'd ask, where did the guys shoes go? If he actually had two full legs beforehand, where's the shoes? Also seems odd he has both legs blown off while a number of people within inches of him don't even appear to have lost a finger, let alone have much blood on them.edit on 20-4-2013 by MysticPearl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lulzaroonie
I would love for the victims who lost their limbs to one day (after they've recovered from their ordeal) find out that they were considered actors. Their outrage would be impressive. Imagine going through something like that, having your legs taken away from you, having to go through rehabilitation, physiotherapy, get new prosthetics (if wanted), learn how to use them, the time, the energy, the pain... all to learn that people suspected you of being an actor for some higher agenda, that your pain and your loss which can only be sympathised by others who have also lost limbs counts for nothing, as long as it fits other people's ideas.
Whether this was a set-up or a true attack... I don't even know any more, this place makes my head spin... I don't believe any of these people were 'acting'. I do genuinely believe they were real victims, taking part in what should have been a fun day. It makes me so angry that people have to roar at shadows, and suspect everything is a cover up.
I'm not saying there are no cover ups. I'm just saying, not everything is...
I appreciate the time and the effort the OP went to to help set some things right, a job I certainly don't envy considering how the images of Jeffrey Bauman have haunted me since they appeared. Kudos.
Originally posted by OutonaLimb
Originally posted by cavscout11cav
reply to post by wrdzrd
so jeff has the same shirt in both photos after what is presumably years???
regard the eyes (or lack thereof) and other strange features of jeff and the girl on the right.
hmmmm!!!???
the top photo is a photoshop creation. full stop!
THIS HOAX IS BUSTED WIDE OPEN!!!! (as it was meant to be, i am sure!).
thank you very much.