AXIS OF NON (B)ank for (I)nternational (S)ettlements members list. As in IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOU

My Opspeculations thus far for these current NWO hostile wars on terror...

In 2000 there were seven countries without a ROTHSCHILD BS BANK !!!

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

What a joke man...

The BS for International Settlements (BIS) was established by an intergovernmental agreement in 1930 by the Rothschild Family. It is an international organization of all the central banks serving as a bank for central banks. As an international institution, it is not accountable to any single national government.

WTF !!!

In 2003 it was

Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

So now in 2013 there are 3 left after the last 13 years of the "WAR ON TERROR"

Cuba
North Korea
Iran

GET RID OF THE WANK BANKS !!!


With a beat
IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!
IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!
IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!
IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!

reply to post by Opspeculate


Keep digging, you are on the right track.

I would encourage you to look at Europe 1930's and find a similar pattern, i would spell it out here, but i know its not looked well upon even on here.

Namaste.

Also, its not as clear cut as you make it,

Here is a map of the official membership:



Alot of nations deal with the BIS without being members

Namaste.

reply to post by WiseThinker


I can only speak for myself but the idea of "elites " trying to reduce the global population (wars) makes no sense to me, particularly in relation to people like the Rothschilds.

Allow me to explain. The Elites are obsessed with money, which leads to power. If they want to keep on increasing their wealth (and therefore their power base) then they need more people on the planet, not less. In basic economic terms, more people = more customers = more wealth.

reply to post by WiseThinker


This clear list is ALSO in text... The BIS member central banks or monetary authorities ( The do the F what we say or else) of these countries:

Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
South Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
European Union European Central Bank


WHO IS NOT ON THE LIST........................................?

THE F'IN TERRORISTS !!!

Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by WiseThinker

 

I can only speak for myself but the idea of "elites " trying to reduce the global population (wars) makes no sense to me, particularly in relation to people like the Rothschilds.

Allow me to explain. The Elites are obsessed with money, which leads to power. If they want to keep on increasing their wealth (and therefore their power base) then they need more people on the planet, not less. In basic economic terms, more people = more customers = more wealth.

I believe money isn't on any list of the Rothschild's. In fact what I imagine from people like them,
who are of both old and new money. These are people who most likely, are practiced at the
art of playing God so well, that what they say, the way they want things to be, their desires are
spoken. And it is so, just as if they were a god. Because someone is there to see to it. And who
ever that someone is, need not terry. Or let them, grow impatient.

What a great thread !

Doesn't it seem that whoever is on the list gets attacked or their government gets overthrown. After they are overthrown and the banks are allowed in the country than they are not an enemy of the western world Maybe there is something to this or maybe it is a coincidence. I think that there is something to this but I am not sure if it is good or bad, I do not look at Rothschild as evil myself, just a powerful family with great ties to the heads of society. Just because they have a lot of power doesn't mean they are evil.

reply to post by rickymouse


Everything is controlled by a small evil group to which, unfortunately, no one we know belongs.
So organize for anarchy !

French style revolution woulf be a quick fix......

Well as long as they are disposing of horrible regimes that make their people suffer I'd say keep up the good work.

I wonder if I can donate to their cause. At least they are taking care of problems the rest of the world ignores for years.

Not sure why you all consider that a bad thing.

Your not sure why I consider that a bad thing...?

Originally posted by Hopechest
Well as long as they are disposing of horrible regimes that make their people suffer I'd say keep up the good work.

I wonder if I can donate to their cause. At least they are taking care of problems the rest of the world ignores for years.

Not sure why you all consider that a bad thing.

So in 1930 the Rothschild BIS only had Germany, Belgium, France, Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Italy, Japan, and Switzerland.

Every country since and continues to be as you put it was "disposing of horrible regimes that make their people suffer I'd say keep up the good work" they are taking care of problems the rest of the world ignores for years as you said

Your not sure why I consider that a bad thing...?

Like all these horrible regimes that made their people suffer before joining the list


Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Brazil
Bulgaria
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
Greece
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
South Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macedonia
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Thailand
Turkey
United Arab Emirates
United States


Your not sure why I consider that a bad thing...?


You said I wonder if I can donate to their cause. At least they are taking care of problems the rest of the world ignores for years. Hey hopeless go and donate to the cause you POS !!!

reply to post by Opspeculate


Most of those countries have not had their regimes changed, only the bad countries have.

So your arguing that sticking a bank in a country is an evil thing? The OP is talking about countries that have either been invaded or been under some sort of international pressure. As far as I know places like Australia have not.

That seems to be irrelevant to the OP.

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by Opspeculate

 

Most of those countries have not had their regimes changed, only the bad countries have.

So your arguing that sticking a bank in a country is an evil thing? The OP is talking about countries that have either been invaded or been under some sort of international pressure. As far as I know places like Australia have not.

That seems to be irrelevant to the OP.

It was already obvious in the OP and relevant to your reply that you tried to make "a good thing" by taking care of your BS boogie man. Australia and the rest did not resist joining the list of ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANKS (BIS) as history shows you become a TERRORIST IF YOU RESIST THE BIS !!!

IF YOU RESIST THE ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANK (BIS) YOU BECOME A TERRORIST

IF YOU DO NOT RESIST THE ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANK YOU DON'T NEED TO BE INVADED

I REPEAT !!!

Australia and the rest did not resist joining the list of ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANKS (BIS)
IF YOU DO NOT RESIST THE ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANK YOU DON'T NEED TO BE INVADED

IF YOU RESIST THE ROTHSCHILD BS WANK BANK (BIS) YOU BECOME A TERRORIST

New verse... with a beat

IF YOU RESIST THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!
IF YOU RESIST THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!
IF YOU RESIST THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!

pause

IF YOUR NOT ON THE LIST YOUR A TERRORIST !!!


Next................

And none of those countries that were subject to some form of international pressure or war had absolutely any other problems with the international community?

They were all successful government institutions contributing to the world as the nations that joined have?

Hmmmm, seems that all the countries that were labeled as a "terrorist" have certain traits in common that are not exibited by countries such as Australia.

How do you account for this commonality which has nothing to do with any banking system?

Or do you choose to disregard it as relevant?

This information is always met with a blank stare, people just can't understand it at all. But it does raise a very interesting question:

The information on why Iran is an "axis of evil" (rogue state means not with the IMF btw) is freely available via the web - just search ATS for example. So, given that, it would seem that Iran MUST know the reason the are on the "going to get nuked list unless..." So, why doesn't Iran hold a series of press conferences saying: "we don't want war, we haven' fought a war in ages, our crime is not being part of the central bank, because we do not believe in it - we are about to die for it." And so on. Say this over and over. The question is why don't they?

Iraq had the same problem, even way back when the US first attacked. Why did the US leave Saddam in place? They could have solved the IMF problem then, but they kept in place for a return visit on purpose. NK, the same exact thing, the war is still on, why? Ponder that.

Originally posted by crankyoldman
This information is always met with a blank stare, people just can't understand it at all. But it does raise a very interesting question:

The information on why Iran is an "axis of evil" (rogue state means not with the IMF btw) is freely available via the web - just search ATS for example. So, given that, it would seem that Iran MUST know the reason the are on the "going to get nuked list unless..." So, why doesn't Iran hold a series of press conferences saying: "we don't want war, we haven' fought a war in ages, our crime is not being part of the central bank, because we do not believe in it - we are about to die for it." And so on. Say this over and over. The question is why don't they?

Iraq had the same problem, even way back when the US first attacked. Why did the US leave Saddam in place? They could have solved the IMF problem then, but they kept in place for a return visit on purpose. NK, the same exact thing, the war is still on, why? Ponder that.

This way of thinking assumes that the only issue that is important in the world is whether or not your part of some banking system.

That is inherently false.

Plenty of other factors also affect decisions on whether a state is embraced or shunned by the world community. You guys are assuming that as long as you join the Rothchilds you can do whatever you want as a nation.

That is very shortsighted.

Originally posted by Hopechest
And none of those countries that were subject to some form of international pressure or war had absolutely any other problems with the international community?

They were all successful government institutions contributing to the world as the nations that joined have?

Hmmmm, seems that all the countries that were labeled as a "terrorist" have certain traits in common that are not exibited by countries such as Australia.

How do you account for this commonality which has nothing to do with any banking system?

Or do you choose to disregard it as relevant?

LOL you said it not me...

"all the countries that were labeled as a "terrorist" have certain traits in common that are not exibited by countries such as Australia."

YES !!! they NOT ARE ON THE LIST ~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~ Australia... is not the list.... duh...

Who makes the terror label ............? CNN ...........................?

What traits..................? countries want to trade and do commerce in their own unit of asset not a ROTHSCHILD BIS unit of debt. If not they have to go...?

Why are you not getting this... there is no need for international pressure or war if your on the list.

The only cause for subject to some form of international pressure or war had absolutely any other problems with the international community is your not on the list... AND TO JOIN THE LIST.

THIS HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE ROTHSCHILD BANKING SYSTEM

THE ONLY TROUBLE MAKER IS the BS for International Settlements (BIS)
Established by an intergovernmental agreement in 1930 by the Rothschild Family. It is an international organization of all the central banks serving as a bank for central banks. As an international institution, it is not accountable to any single national government... As an international institution, it is not accountable to any single national government.

ON ONE ELSE...

In 2000 there were seven countries without a ROTHSCHILD BS BANK !!!

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

ALSO THE WORLDS TERRORISTS...

Man you have to try really really hard to be that torpid !!!



READ THE OP AGAIN SLOWLY.

reply to post by Opspeculate


The BRIC"s nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) are attempting to set up an alternative to the IMF, and use the yuan as the reserve currency.

WW3 is being set up as we speak.

If you want to have a look at who/what is at the top of the illumanati - look at the history of the jesuits.

1st jesuit pope is making inroads to setting up a world religion and having the capital be jerusalem.

reply to post by Opspeculate


So according to your theory then, if we get rid of the Rothschild banking system than there will never be war in the world again, one country will never be another and we will all live peacefully?

Interesting.

It certainly doesn't explain all the warfare before banking systems were established but that was a long time ago I suppose so its irrelevant.

lol

Originally posted by Hopechest

Originally posted by crankyoldman
This information is always met with a blank stare, people just can't understand it at all. But it does raise a very interesting question:

The information on why Iran is an "axis of evil" (rogue state means not with the IMF btw) is freely available via the web - just search ATS for example. So, given that, it would seem that Iran MUST know the reason the are on the "going to get nuked list unless..." So, why doesn't Iran hold a series of press conferences saying: "we don't want war, we haven' fought a war in ages, our crime is not being part of the central bank, because we do not believe in it - we are about to die for it." And so on. Say this over and over. The question is why don't they?

Iraq had the same problem, even way back when the US first attacked. Why did the US leave Saddam in place? They could have solved the IMF problem then, but they kept in place for a return visit on purpose. NK, the same exact thing, the war is still on, why? Ponder that.

This way of thinking assumes that the only issue that is important in the world is whether or not your part of some banking system.

That is inherently false.

Plenty of other factors also affect decisions on whether a state is embraced or shunned by the world community. You guys are assuming that as long as you join the Rothchilds you can do whatever you want as a nation.

That is very shortsighted.

This is an interesting refutation, you created your own straw man off of what I said, then stated that what I said is short sighted. The problem is, your effort is rather transparent as what I said was very clear. I am well aware of what the elite 8 are after, and I am actually well aware of what they are planning in the near and distant future, as I am sure you are as well, but this reply by me was not about that at all and was clearly stated: IF, if the issue is the IMF membership AND that information is easily obtained, WHY doesn't Iran simply state so. This question is based on anything "inherently" anything, and knowing the elite 8's plans as you do, you'll know my point is valid.